Yes.
I take each and every opinion on board, be it over track surfaces, horse performance, what the weather might do....but I'm quite capable of analyzing what has been said and filing it for future use.
I don't have to rush off and slavishly follow said opinion.
Years ago I sat at a meeting where a Turftech representative ( Jim Murphy) was in attendance, along with CJC personnel. The work being undertaken at Rangiora following the accident there was being discussed. Much was made of the grass type being promoted which, according to the meeting Chair, was in use internationally and from Ruakaka to Invercargill.
I got a kick under the table. Wouldn't you think grass types would be different depending on climate, etc? hissed the person sitting next to me.
I thought so too, but these were experts, so I listened.
Messrs Foskett and Murphy had overseen the Rangiora work and given the track a double thumbs up for racing.
But NZTR didn't want to know and racing has never returned to that track.
Clearly those experts weren't worth listening to.
So who are the current experts who are advising our governing body?
They must be good.