Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Sports betting tops Racing in February ...


TAB For Ever

Recommended Posts

Curious I was trying to be diplomatic, as i am aware that for many years in certain circles there has been an argument as to who owns the TAB, the government  or the racing clubs, i think even Rodger Douglas was looking to sell it  but backed off as he could not get clarity over the ownership position, thus in fairness to racing i have always believed that the clubs who started the Tote in the early 1900s still own the IP which is based within the Jetbet system, As to the ownership of the rest of the Entain run TAB i think it is fair to say that Racing can have no claim on that.....hope that answers your question.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, westbrew said:

Curious I was trying to be diplomatic, as i am aware that for many years in certain circles there has been an argument as to who owns the TAB, the government  or the racing clubs, i think even Rodger Douglas was looking to sell it  but backed off as he could not get clarity over the ownership position, thus in fairness to racing i have always believed that the clubs who started the Tote in the early 1900s still own the IP which is based within the Jetbet system, As to the ownership of the rest of the Entain run TAB i think it is fair to say that Racing can have no claim on that.....hope that answers your question.   

Reading the latest TABNZ annual report Jetbet is long gone.

The TAB has always been a statutory entity.  The Crown owns it in fact it only exists as long as the Crown permits it to.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, westbrew said:

as i am aware that for many years in certain circles there has been an argument as to who owns the TAB, the government  or the racing clubs,

lol, there is even a book written about it! :)

 

Two Over Three on Goodtime Sugar

The New Zealand TAB Turns 50

By David Malcolm Grant · 2000

https://www.google.co.nz/books/edition/Two_Over_Three_on_Goodtime_Sugar/yoXj5orq514C?hl=en&gbpv=0

 

Edited by Murray Fish
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Curious, so given that NZ Racing has no claim on the tote, and in reality were just the first ones to use it, they clearly have no right to any income generated by the NZ TAB outside of that generated on the sport of horse racing, so time for the Government to amend the legislation so that each sport receives its share of the 50% profit that entain does not take.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, westbrew said:

Thanks Curious, so given that NZ Racing has no claim on the tote, and in reality were just the first ones to use it, they clearly have no right to any income generated by the NZ TAB outside of that generated on the sport of horse racing, so time for the Government to amend the legislation so that each sport receives its share of the 50% profit that entain does not take.  

As has been pointed out to you before the legislation exists for Sports to receive profit revenue from the TAB activities related to those sports.  However they must have a NSO (National Sporting Organisation) to be eligible.  

Unless you are arguing that the surplus revenue from Sports that don't have an agreement should be shared by equally or proportionally amongst all three codes and any sport that has an agreement with the TAB.  Name one Sport that doesn't have an NSO/agreement with the TAB that has significant revenue that isn't distributed to that Sport?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang on chief, i know what has been pointed out but to clarify what you are presenting as the money flows from TAB activity, are you are saying that the profit that the TAB generates at the end of its financial year and then passes on to racing is all made from betting on racing???? As the sports have all been paid their profit. I am talking about the dividend paid at the end of the year. The TAB as you say is a state owned body but it does not pay a dividend to the Government it pays it to racing . And if i read what you are saying rite you are saying that this amount of profit at then end of the year is just profit from racing as sports have already been paid all of the profit generated on their individual sport??? 

What I am saying is yes the national sports organisations are getting a share but only a share not all of the profit made on their individual sport. The balance of the profit made on these sports is part of the profit of the TAB which is then paid to racing. The question is why is racing getting it??? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, westbrew said:

but to clarify what you are presenting as the money flows from TAB activity, are you are saying that the profit that the TAB generates at the end of its financial year and then passes on to racing is all made from betting on racing????

No.  Never has been.

3 minutes ago, westbrew said:

As the sports have all been paid their profit.

Not every sport that is bet on has an NSO or an agreement with the TAB therefore any particulary profits from other sports is put back into the general fund as per the legislation.

 

4 minutes ago, westbrew said:

it does not pay a dividend to the Government it pays it to racing

and sport.

5 minutes ago, westbrew said:

is yes the national sports organisations are getting a share but only a share not all of the profit made on their individual sport. The balance of the profit made on these sports is part of the profit of the TAB which is then paid to racing.

How do you know they are not getting all their profit?

6 minutes ago, westbrew said:

The balance of the profit made on these sports is part of the profit of the TAB which is then paid to racing.

Again how do you know that?

6 minutes ago, westbrew said:

The question is why is racing getting it??? 

It is in the legislation subject to the specific clauses.

Read the Act:  https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0028/latest/LMS291924.html

Particularly Sections - 78-82 and 65, 71-23 and 128.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read the TAB accounts chief Racing got 225m sport got 26m so you are telling me that the TAB generated 225m from racing and 26m from sports, even blind freddy can join the dots on that one.

And yes the point is the legislation does allow for what is happening as per the above distribution, but laws can and are regularly changed, and as i stated earlier more and more sports globally are generating cash from betting on their sport, and i will once again bow to your superior knowledge on the subject, but to me the split looks a bit like racing is taking some of sports cake, and maybe some sports administrators may begin to think the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, westbrew said:

Read the TAB accounts chief Racing got 225m sport got 26m so you are telling me that the TAB generated 225m from racing and 26m from sports, even blind freddy can join the dots on that one.

If you are talking the latest accounts you can't draw any conclusions because the revenue isn't related to profit from turnover. 

Probably the only relevant Annual accounts is the 2019 Annual Report.  Sports Turnover was 26% of total turnover.  $10m was paid to Sporting Organisations based on a % of turnover and betting margin earned on their respective sports.  You are now saying that is $26m however we don't don't what the total turnover on fixed odds sports was.   

26 minutes ago, westbrew said:

And yes the point is the legislation does allow for what is happening as per the above distribution, but laws can and are regularly changed, and as i stated earlier more and more sports globally are generating cash from betting on their sport, and i will once again bow to your superior knowledge on the subject, but to me the split looks a bit like racing is taking some of sports cake, and maybe some sports administrators may begin to think the same.

I don't disagree that Racing is taking some of the Sports Cake.  Whether they are getting a fair share can only be speculated on as we don't know what the agreements are or the individual costs.  I'm sure each sporting organisation has the nous to negotiate a deal that is fair to themselves and there are avenues for addressing anything untoward.

Don't forget Sporting Organisations have sources of funding that Racing doesn't have.

As for "bowing to my superior knowledge" there is no need to play dumb around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...