interested Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 where is the evidence ???? court papers or copy off SSSOOOOO MANY UNTRUTHS ON THIS SITE . And I ASKED How DO YOU KNOW? No Reply to that ????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Possum Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Mehe said: Possum I done some digging on you last statement you made and you should be careful with what your saying Really? He got charged and imprisoned for it.. so perhaps you should do some more digging??? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Four shaw said: I like to see a photo of cole standing on his trailer across the road from the track obviously warned OFF today I read on MSN news that the Easter Bunny was mauled by a pack of greyhounds in Palmerston North, while delivering eggs, in the wee hours of Sunday morning. It's also been reported that a PN man has been seen standing on his trailer in Wanganui today, calling out for Santa, claiming that he's been a good boy this year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitofaLegend Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 (edited) 42 minutes ago, Short Stuff said: If he has been warned off why are dogs in his name racing today.Not sure but when John Goode warned off he couldn’t race his dogs #1 Dogs are not under his name, they are Lisa Coles #2 Rules are very clear on this matter, the RIU trying to apply these rules to trainers racing dogs and warned of people living on properties where dogs are trained is laughable at best as warning offs only apply to racing tracks... Anyone who has been told either or should have challenged the rulings Edited April 22, 2019 by BitofaLegend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitofaLegend Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Warning Brendan of changes nothing. All it means is that he will not be allowed on a race course. Its makes it look like they are doing something without actually doing it. Lisa Cole should also be prosecuted as the dogs being baited were on her registered property and were her dogs. Her being the trainer makes her ultimately responsible for the dogs under the rules of racing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie aussie aussie Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 17 minutes ago, BitofaLegend said: Warning Brendan of changes nothing. All it means is that he will not be allowed on a race course. Its makes it look like they are doing something without actually doing it. Lisa Cole should also be prosecuted as the dogs being baited were on her registered property and were her dogs. Her being the trainer makes her ultimately responsible for the dogs under the rules of racing. Yes 100pc and it will happen once it is proved...but a this stage lisa has not been charged but if brendon has been warned off ..dogs racing under his ownership cannot race but will be able to with a ownership change...remember there are innocent owners in this wether we like it or not and they should not be implicated by association... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitofaLegend Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 76.1 No Licenced Person may train, or keep (unless retired as a pet) any Greyhounds at any property or premises of a person who has been Disqualified, Warned Off, Suspended or declared to be a Defaulter, during that person’s period of disqualification, warning off, suspension or default. 76.2 No person who has been Disqualified, Warned Off, Suspended, or declared to be a Defaulter, shall be permitted during the period of disqualification, warning off, suspension or default, to transfer ownership or any training responsibilities for any Greyhound, to any other person without the written consent of the Board. Rules were changed. He cannot be on the property if he is warned off 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Testy Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Another under the rug job to keep the antis from getting wind of it.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaman Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Here's the reality of the situation. Brendon is only a handler, he is warned off. The Cole operation do not need Brendon the handler. He is perfectly expendable as far as the kennel goes, it will be business as usual after a few adjustments are made. A new licensed handler will replace Brendon. They will work covertly under the direction of Brendon. Between the new handler and Brendon the new director, dogs will be fitted out for Lisa to carry on training winners. This can carry on like this for years, as Brendons defense will be the Lisa Cropp method off appealing every decision through to the Supreme Court. It could drag on for years. Meanwhile, business as usual at Cole headquarters just minus Brendon the handler. The thing I find staggering is the fact that the NZGRA must know this is how it will pan out through their not warning Lisa off, or using the power to REVOKE which they have under the rules. So if this is the sum total of the NZGRA's response, then it is nothing more than a wet bus ticket, as warning off a handler is hardly decisive stuff in protecting the image of Greyhound racing. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cockyaleg Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 4 hours ago, Aussie aussie aussie said: Yes 100pc and it will happen once it is proved...but a this stage lisa has not been charged but if brendon has been warned off ..dogs racing under his ownership cannot race but will be able to with a ownership change...remember there are innocent owners in this wether we like it or not and they should not be implicated by association... Brendon owns a number of dogs on his own. Dogs owned in partnership can be transferred to other trainers. But there will be no movement without the board's approval. They could agree to trainer transfers, they could deny ownership transfers for all, they could just allow the partnership dogs to continue and remove Cole from the papers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.