Mehe Posted June 29, 2019 Share Posted June 29, 2019 11 hours ago, BitofaLegend said: Sounds like BS to me mate. Who paid him out? I think you should call nzgra and ask a few questions instead of saying its BS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockit Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 On 6/28/2019 at 9:01 PM, Mehe said: Mr cole got a pay out of 8k for this race when he should have been fined What did Cole get paid out for mehe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Go and do some research your not a very clever person are you 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockit Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 28 minutes ago, Mehe said: Go and do some research your not a very clever person are you Your telling the story. I only asked a question. No need for snarky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockit Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 So who ended up with egg on their face? Not Cole?? Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Rockit they were paid out for nominating a dog illegally they should have been find do you understand that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitofaLegend Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 12 hours ago, Mehe said: Rockit they were paid out for nominating a dog illegally they should have been find do you understand that You have still provided no evidence that this was the case at all though. Sounds like you are making things up out of the blue with this one 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Rockit they were paid out for nominating a dog illegally they should have been find do you understand that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 1 hour ago, BitofaLegend said: You have still provided no evidence that this was the case at all though. Sounds like you are making things up out of the blue with this one Why would I make something up like that for I told you to call nzgra did you no ask Kerr like I did He never authorized it but someone did now who would that have been I wonder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockit Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Mehe said: Rockit they were paid out for nominating a dog illegally they should have been find do you understand that No I don't understand it. You said they were paid out for doing something illegal. Why would they be paid out for that. As you said I'm not very clever. So yes I need it explained like abc. As for being clever. Fined not find:-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 Look as I said go do your research look Maybe read all the postings on here and you will understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockit Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 10 minutes ago, Mehe said: Look as I said go do your research look Maybe read all the postings on here and you will understand I just thought it would be better to hear it from someone who knows. You obviously do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 Yes and the more you post the more I think your cole Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 3 hours ago, Mehe said: Why would I make something up like that for I told you to call nzgra did you no ask Kerr like I did He never authorized it but someone did now who would that have been I wonder So if someone authorised it why should Cole be fined. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehe Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 The dog was scratched because it was not by a nz based site breach of the rules so should have been fined Not only that Cole got paid out to scratch then scratch the other two dogs as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 You say someone authorised it.so it’s hardly his fault if the decision was overturned later. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockit Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Milo said: You say someone authorised it.so it’s hardly his fault if the decision was overturned later. Mehe will tell you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockit Posted July 7, 2019 Share Posted July 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Mehe said: Yes and the more you post the more I think your cole Think all you like. The more you post I think you are............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaman Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 B Cole nominates dog in good faith going on information received from NZ Greyhound Ass. Then Goldstar [ Steve Evens] discovers dog is not eligible under the rules pertaining to said race and puts it out there on social media. NZGRA are then forced to back track because Steve was correct in that the dog was not eligible under the rules. Not B Coles fault, but NZGRA's fault for incorrect information. End result, B Cole forced to scratch, and compensation paid out to Mr Cole. NZGRA are incompetent, and should apologise for wasting industry money. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwigreys Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 13 hours ago, aquaman said: B Cole nominates dog in good faith going on information received from NZ Greyhound Ass. Then Goldstar [ Steve Evens] discovers dog is not eligible under the rules pertaining to said race and puts it out there on social media. NZGRA are then forced to back track because Steve was correct in that the dog was not eligible under the rules. Not B Coles fault, but NZGRA's fault for incorrect information. End result, B Cole forced to scratch, and compensation paid out to Mr Cole. NZGRA are incompetent, and should apologise for wasting industry money. But surely you would know if your dog is eligible or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mischief managed Posted July 8, 2019 Share Posted July 8, 2019 2 hours ago, Kiwigreys said: But surely you would know if your dog is eligible or not? Grnz told them the dog was eligible... despite last year telling myself our above all daughter was ineligible 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mighty5 Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 23 hours ago, aquaman said: B Cole nominates dog in good faith going on information received from NZ Greyhound Ass. Then Goldstar [ Steve Evens] discovers dog is not eligible under the rules pertaining to said race and puts it out there on social media. NZGRA are then forced to back track because Steve was correct in that the dog was not eligible under the rules. Not B Coles fault, but NZGRA's fault for incorrect information. End result, B Cole forced to scratch, and compensation paid out to Mr Cole. NZGRA are incompetent, and should apologise for wasting industry money. Why couldn’t they just apologise. I don’t think it was necessary to give them that much just to say sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aquaman Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 20 minutes ago, Mighty5 said: Why couldn’t they just apologise. I don’t think it was necessary to give them that much just to say sorry. Probably because they were wrong, and lawyers would become involved if they didn't. As I said, they are incompetent, and this is what you get when you have poor quality employees running the show. I could say something else, but will bite my tongue and give them the benefit of the doubt. Needless to say, legally they, the NZGRA would of been skating on thin ice if it went the judicial way, and paying out the winning stake was the cheapest way out. Brendon would have a pretty cashed up war chest to employ good lawyers. Just my opinion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwigreys Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 39 minutes ago, aquaman said: Probably because they were wrong, and lawyers would become involved if they didn't. As I said, they are incompetent, and this is what you get when you have poor quality employees running the show. I could say something else, but will bite my tongue and give them the benefit of the doubt. Needless to say, legally they, the NZGRA would of been skating on thin ice if it went the judicial way, and paying out the winning stake was the cheapest way out. Brendon would have a pretty cashed up war chest to employ good lawyers. Just my opinion. Sooooo, when GRNZ cocks it up out comes the chequebook!!!, unbelievable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankiwi Posted July 9, 2019 Share Posted July 9, 2019 On paper, GRNZ is the one running the show. In reality, residents of Palmerston North & Darfield are running the show incognito. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.