Happy Sunrise Posted December 20, 2019 Share Posted December 20, 2019 I read this with interest and started doubting my memory as I thought cobalt positives got some trainers in a good deal of trouble a couple of years ago but this seems to be very run of the mill with just a simple loss of the race and no fines...nothing. Has the attitude to cobalt changed or is my memory wrong? NON RACEDAY INQUIRY RIU V G ANDERSON - DECISION ON A REQUEST FOR A RULING DATED 6 DECEMBER 2019 - CHAIR, PROF G HALL Created on 10 December 2019 BEFORE A JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE JUDICIAL CONTROL AUTHORITY UNDER THE RACING ACT 2003 AND IN THE MATTER of the New Zealand Rules of Harness Racing BETWEEN RACING INTEGRITY UNIT (RIU) Informant AND GRAEME ANDERSON Licensed Trainer Respondent INFORMATION NO: A4826 COMMITTEE: Prof G Hall (Chairman) Mr P Knowles (Member) APPEARING: Mr P Meulenbroek, Racing Investigator, for the RIU The respondent in person RULING OF JUDICIAL COMMITTEE [1] The informant, the RIU, seek a ruling under r 1004D(1) of the New Zealand Rules of Harness Racing disqualifying the horse BONO BROWN from the Forbury Park TC meeting at Dunedin on 2 November 2019. The horse is alleged to have tested positive for Cobalt. [2] Rule 1004(1A) states: A horse shall be presented for a race free of prohibited substances. [3] Rule 1004(4) provides: A breach of sub-rule (1A) is committed regardless of the circumstances in which the prohibited substance came to be present in or on the horse. [4] Rule 1004D(1) states: Any horse taken to a racecourse for the purpose of engaging in a race which is found to have administered to it or ingested by it a prohibited substance (which includes out of competition prohibited substances) must be disqualified from that race. [5] The Prohibited Substances Regulation 4 states: The following substances are not prohibited when present at or below the following threshold: 4.11 Cobalt at a concentration at or below 100 micrograms per litre in urine. [6] BONO BROWN is a 4-year-old bay gelding trained by Mr Anderson at Westwood Beach, Dunedin. BONO BROWN is co-owned by Mr Anderson and Mr B Sceats. BONO BROWN has had 4 race starts for a win and two placings as at 30 November 2019. [7] BONO BROWN was correctly entered and presented by Mr Anderson to race in Race 2, the NORWOOD FARM MACHINERY CENTRE MOBILE PACE at the Forbury Park TC meeting on 2 November 2019. BONO BROWN won the race, winning a stake of $4000. This stake has not yet been paid out. [8] BONO BROWN was post-race swabbed and a urine sample was taken immediately after it entered the swab box at 1.26 pm in the presence of Ms S Bransgrove who is Mr Anderson's wife and also a qualified veterinarian. The sample was recorded with the swab card number 146784. Mr Anderson does not contest the taking of the sample. [9] On 22 November 2019 Racing Analytical Services Limited accredited laboratory in Victoria Australia sent a Certificate of Analysis for sample 146784 that showed a result of 128 micrograms of Cobalt per litre of urine. [10] On the 26 November 2019 Eurofins ELS Limited laboratory in Wellington reported an Analytical result that the Urine Sample number 146784 had returned a Cobalt result of 130 micrograms per litre of urine. [11] Both results are a breach of the New Zealand Rules of Harness Racing which specify that Cobalt is only permitted when present at a concentration at or below 100 micrograms per litre. [12] On 4 December Mr Anderson signed a statement agreeing to the fact that under the Rules BONO BROWN must be disqualified. [13] Mr Anderson confirmed this at the hearing this afternoon. [14] We rule pursuant to r 1004D(1) that BONO BROWN is disqualified from race 2 at the Forbury Park TC meeting on 2 November 2019. [15] Amended placings are: 1st TUAPEKA JESSIE 2nd BARIKA 3rd MACK SHEER 4th HOKURI PLATTER 5th MY MAN ROOSTER [16] Stakes are to be paid accordingly. Dated at Dunedin this 6th day of December 2019. Geoff Hall, Chairman 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the galah Posted December 20, 2019 Share Posted December 20, 2019 Its a bit like a couple of the other recent positives where they disqualify the horse so stakes can be paid out but deal with the penalty at a later date. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the galah Posted December 20, 2019 Share Posted December 20, 2019 (edited) 23 minutes ago, the galah said: Its a bit like a couple of the other recent positives where they disqualify the horse so stakes can be paid out but deal with the penalty at a later date. This has been a very positive change for connections of horses who are to be promoted. We once had a horse involved in a promotion and it took almost a year for them to have a hearing , despite connections of the horse who returned the positive wanting to get it dealt with and admitting they had made an error. That was pre RIU days. its appears only recently that those dealing with these cases have shown common sense and fairness when dealing with this side of a positive.It is good to see. Edited December 20, 2019 by the galah 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunterthepunter Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 On 21/12/2019 at 1:05 AM, the galah said: This has been a very positive change for connections of horses who are to be promoted. We once had a horse involved in a promotion and it took almost a year for them to have a hearing , despite connections of the horse who returned the positive wanting to get it dealt with and admitting they had made an error. That was pre RIU days. its appears only recently that those dealing with these cases have shown common sense and fairness when dealing with this side of a positive.It is good to see. common sense don't think so as Riu think they are higher than the police and courts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.