Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

Question regarding stakes payout.


mikeynz

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Huey said:

Don't they get put back into the winners distribution?

The best thing they are currently doing at NZTR is paying out to 14th, probably the reason the field sizes have remained strong in volume.

Took a completely positive move and undermined it by taking it out of the winners prize , brain dead decision . Suppose it was too much to expect them to get something completely right .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, curious said:

Where would you take it from?

 

Add to the stake or just have a pool for paying starters , it's robbing Peter to pay Paul FFS . We are supposed to be incentivizing people to keep racing horses , and the positive was paying a starters incentive , OH but we are going to pay you less for winning . 

If ever we needed proof of how empty our coffers are this is it . While the starters payment is something i have wanted for years , there is no point doing it if you can't afford it , better off staying with status quo . 

Maybe if they had taken 10% off the top end races we would have had a pool to help make these payments to some of the battlers that are looking for a reason to stay in the game . But no , they start making starters payments but basically say it has to fund itself . Pointless exercise .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...