Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

New Plymouth 29 December - 58 horses 7 Races. Why?


Chief Stipe

Recommended Posts

On 29/12/2020 at 9:08 AM, Chief Stipe said:

Have horse numbers in the CD dropped to below levels to sustain racing in the District?

If it wasn't for the Northern visitors the fields would be decimated.

The Taranaki track isn't the best in the CD by a long stretch - is that the reason for the lack of numbers?

Or was it a dumb idea to run two meetings two days apart?

Maybe it highlights how stuffed our supposedly 2 Tier systems is - any trainer/owner with any brains would wait for the Premier meetings if numbers are low.

 

Happens EVERY single year at this time...no surprises here...

Every province has Holiday traffic and always line up for xtra race meetings to satisfy the need for entertainment...who knew?

Its like numbers dropping off in February with the hard tracks and post Xmas busy period with higher stakes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Thomass said:

Happens EVERY single year at this time...no surprises here...

Every province has Holiday traffic and always line up for xtra race meetings to satisfy the need for entertainment...who knew?

Its like numbers dropping off in February with the hard tracks and post Xmas busy period with higher stakes

Don't take up Thoroughbred Racing administration as a career.  The point that was being made, which I realise escapes you, is why have two days at New Plymouth two days apart?  7 races each day.  Especially when there aren't the horses available.  Add to that the fact that revenue is generated off course with quality fields.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Thomass said:

They took up the Stratford date and saved the Industry having stables pay xtra transport costs to travel....

Carey did a great marketing job making the first day 'Party Day' and the 2nd Family day...very successful by the sounds

You miss the point - again I'm not surprised that you have.  Using your logic we would have four days at New Plymouth with four races each day.  The fact is there aren't enough horses around to sustain two days at the same location two days apart.  In the CD there are 7 race meetings in 14 days.  

Running 6 or 7 races at one meeting costs the industry.  Add to that poor quality fields and the industry receives a net loss.  What's more it puts punters off even more.

Congrats to Carey for doing a great marketing job at NP - but it isn't paying the industry bills!

But that is what you get from this mob when they are driven by calendar dates and not key industry metrics like:  number of horses in work, number of horses ready to race by rating, race field sizes relative to punting revenue generated and so on and so on.

As Joe Bloggs says - "what can you expect from someone who thinks you gallop a horse EVERY day!"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Thomass said:

They took up the Stratford date and saved the Industry having stables pay xtra transport costs to travel....

Carey did a great marketing job making the first day 'Party Day' and the 2nd Family day...very successful by the sounds

The question based on the initial post should be , is it more successful for the industry based on what was in place previously? A lot of these larger clubs get good PR from the governing body , no matter what they do. 

Based on fields & horse numbers like Hastings that does not appear to be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...