Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

Holey Pastas rant on Neoliberalism!


Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

some examples to back your allegations would be good.

You should quit while you're still standing!

Go and have a...bet..you'll feel better.

Read your own posts.  You talk a load of crap about things you obviously have no idea about.  That is made even more apparent when you are questioned and found wanting.  Then you roll out another set of slogans and dogma which you clearly have no understanding about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chief Stipe said:

Read your own posts.  You talk a load of crap about things you obviously have no idea about.  That is made even more apparent when you are questioned and found wanting.  Then you roll out another set of slogans and dogma which you clearly have no understanding about.

Yeah right!You avoid evidence with a passion.

You cannot sustain your jaundiced opinion and you resort to facile,subjective conclusions.

I can see you never made the debating team....constantly repeating the same empty refrains  is not a basis for informed discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

Yeah right!You avoid evidence with a passion.

You cannot sustain your jaundiced opinion and you resort to facile,subjective conclusions.

I can see you never made the debating team....constantly repeating the same empty refrains  is not a basis for informed discussion.

You are projecting Holey Pasta.  You have no depth to your argument because you don't really understand what you are spewing forth.

As for your ad hominem attacks they are as inaccurate as you political assertions.

I did make the debating team three years in a row as third speaker.  I had a reputation for quick wit, rapier style rebuttal and immolating my opponents.

No doubt now you will respond with more slogans in your misguided crusade against neoliberalism not that you understand the term nor have any coherent alternative!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

You are projecting Holey Pasta.  You have no depth to your argument because you don't really understand what you are spewing forth.

As for your ad hominem attacks they are as inaccurate as you political assertions.

I did make the debating team three years in a row as third speaker.  I had a reputation for quick wit, rapier style rebuttal and immolating my opponents.

No doubt now you will respond with more slogans in your misguided crusade against neoliberalism not that you understand the term nor have any coherent alternative!

'I had a reputation for quick wit, rapier style rebuttal and immolating my opponents.'...lol!

Listen up...you rely on assumption,knee jerk reaction and avoidance ..that is your m.o...a neutral person only needs to scan this thread to confirm..you have NO game.

Whenever I ask you for evidence,definitions on which you base your opinion...you RUN and swerve and resort to benign epithets ,typical of those displaying cognitive dissonance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, holy ravioli said:

Listen up...you rely on assumption,knee jerk reaction and avoidance ..that is your m.o...a neutral person only needs to scan this thread to confirm..you have NO game.

How can anyone debate someone such as you who posts generally no substance interspersed with inaccuracies and political slogans?

You're obviously a fool who understands very little.

As for asserting I have cognitive dissonance again you are projecting.  My actions are certainly not at odds with my beliefs however it is clearly evident in your political diatribes that you are either conflicted in your beliefs or more likely don't have the cognitive ability to understand what you pontificate about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

How can anyone debate someone such as you who posts generally no substance interspersed with inaccuracies and political slogans?

You're obviously a fool who understands very little.

As for asserting I have cognitive dissonance again you are projecting.  My actions are certainly not at odds with my beliefs however it is clearly evident in your political diatribes that you are either conflicted in your beliefs or more likely don't have the cognitive ability to understand what you pontificate about.

You attack the messenger not the message.

I'm sure you know how to milk a cow,but when it comes to economics and geo politics....go  and make some...butter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

You attack the messenger not the message.

I'm sure you know how to milk a cow,but when it comes to economics and geo politics....go  and make some...butter.

But you haven't posted any coherent "message".  If anything you've cut and pasted someone else's unintelligible rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Well if that's the case it is even sadder.  You may actually believe the rubbish your write.

What is sad is that you accuse someone of what is fraud,and do not even have the decency to apologise.

My submissions are based on factual information....not emotional knee jerk reaction which is another hallmark of your retorts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

What is sad is that you accuse someone of what is fraud,and do not even have the decency to apologise.

 

Diddums!  None of what you write is actually original nor accurate!  To infer otherwise if fraud!

17 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

My submissions are based on factual information....not emotional knee jerk reaction which is another hallmark of your retorts.

You haven't produced any factual information or more importantly a cogent argument with regard to cause and effect.

Your credibility is zero based on the slogans you spew forth which indicates that you truly don't understand what you write.

Hell the best economic success you could come up with for this Labour Government was the eradication of Mycoplasma bovis - which was not only false but of doubtful positive economic benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

Diddums!  None of what you write is actually original nor accurate!  To infer otherwise if fraud!

You haven't produced any factual information or more importantly a cogent argument with regard to cause and effect.

Your credibility is zero based on the slogans you spew forth which indicates that you truly don't understand what you write.

Hell the best economic success you could come up with for this Labour Government was the eradication of Mycoplasma bovis - which was not only false but of doubtful positive economic benefit.

Oh the irony ..you have come up with absolutely NOTHING,that has any basis in fact.

You keep regurgitating your subjective opinion.

Sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

Oh the irony ..you have come up with absolutely NOTHING,that has any basis in fact.

How can I when you have posted nothing of any substance?  No original thought.  No detailed analysis.  Just slogans!  I guess you are one of the "team of 5 million" that have "gone hard and early".

11 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

You keep regurgitating your subjective opinion.

I haven't regurgitated anything let alone an opinion.  I have stated a fact that you just regurgitate slogans and cliches with very little apparent understanding.

Now that is really sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

How can I when you have posted nothing of any substance?  No original thought.  No detailed analysis.  Just slogans!  I guess you are one of the "team of 5 million" that have "gone hard and early".

I haven't regurgitated anything let alone an opinion.  I have stated a fact that you just regurgitate slogans and cliches with very little apparent understanding.

Now that is really sad.

I have asked you to cite these slogans and cliches=you can't.

I have asked for your definition of Socialism,Capitalism,free markets=you can't.etc

The little Chief...that couldn't.

Give up your glaringly juvenile attempts at debate.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

I have asked you to cite these slogans and cliches=you can't.

 

Don't have to - you did.

14 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

I have asked for your definition of Socialism,Capitalism,free markets=you can't.etc

 

I can however I choose not to as they are self evident and well defined unlike your "Neo-liberalism" which is nothing but a slogan - it isn't even an ideology!

16 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

The little Chief...that couldn't.

Give up your glaringly juvenile attempts at debate.

 

Classic pot kettle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Don't have to - you did.

I can however I choose not to as they are self evident and well defined unlike your "Neo-liberalism" which is nothing but a slogan - it isn't even an ideology!

Classic pot kettle!

'I  can however I choose not to'....that about sums up your debating 'skills'.

As fanatical as a Trumpanzee and about as...intelligent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

'I  can however I choose not to'....that about sums up your debating 'skills'

....because it is pointless to debate the definition of well defined concepts.  It would be a waste of time.

Now we could debate whether the concept of Communism was good or bad or that a policy of Ardens Government was a manifestation of Communisn or not.

But the concept of debate seems to be unique to you and no one else that I have encountered.  So arguably it would be an exercise in futility.

When I ask for an example of a success from good policy of this Government you clutch at straws and state totally from left field the eradication of Mycoplasma bovis.  Odd to say the least!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

....because it is pointless to debate the definition of well defined concepts.  It would be a waste of time.

Now we could debate whether the concept of Communism was good or bad or that a policy of Ardens Government was a manifestation of Communisn or not.

But the concept of debate seems to be unique to you and no one else that I have encountered.  So arguably it would be an exercise in futility.

When I ask for an example of a success from good policy of this Government you clutch at straws and state totally from left field the eradication of Mycoplasma bovis.  Odd to say the least!

O.K ,I'll give you the benfit of the doubt.

Lets debate Communism..as per your definition and include Arderns policy.Go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Nothing to debate.  I don't like it.

Which policy?  Your sentence is bordering on illiterate.

Wonder who posted this!

'Now we could debate whether the concept of Communism was good or bad or that a policy of Ardens Government was a manifestation of Communisn or not.'

Clearly you are allhat and no...cattle and pooing your pants.Give up...the hole is getting deeper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, holy ravioli said:

Wonder who posted this!

'Now we could debate whether the concept of Communism was good or bad or that a policy of Ardens Government was a manifestation of Communisn or not.'

Clearly you are allhat and no...cattle and pooing your pants.Give up...the hole is getting deeper.

Communism is bad.

Which Arden policy do you want to debate?  Mycoplasma bovis eradication?  You seem to have a fixation with cattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...