Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Breaking The Rules To Win A G1 - Not Once But Twice


All The Aces

Recommended Posts

M Cameron (LICKETY SPLIT) - Admitted a charge of using the whip in three consecutive strides followed by a further four consecutive strides after a pause of one stride on his mount LICKETY SPLIT inside the 100 metres. After considering submissions the Adjudicative Committee suspended M Cameron’s licence to ride in races from the conclusion of racing on Saturday 26 March up to and including racing on Saturday 9 April, 8 national riding days and imposed a fine of $3,500

Margin a nose!  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, All The Aces said:

M Cameron (LICKETY SPLIT) - Admitted a charge of using the whip in three consecutive strides followed by a further four consecutive strides after a pause of one stride on his mount LICKETY SPLIT inside the 100 metres. After considering submissions the Adjudicative Committee suspended M Cameron’s licence to ride in races from the conclusion of racing on Saturday 26 March up to and including racing on Saturday 9 April, 8 national riding days and imposed a fine of $3,500

Margin a nose!  

 

It does seem very unfair if one jockey follows the rules and gets beaten a nose and another breaks the rules and wins by a nose. Bad in any race, but especially a group 1. 

Of course if they did start relegating or disqualifying horses because of this rule there would be an outcry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Freda said:

I'm not in favour of completely banning whips.

There will always be the odd smarty pants who has worked out that they  can cruise home untouched, without so much as a flick to say, wake up!

I can recall a horse at Riccarton a few years ago that cruised to the lead under its own steam inside the 200m, the jockey then hit it with the whip and it stopped dead. Almost as if it was saying "I'm doing perfectly ok as it is, don't try that rubbish on me."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, curious said:

Think we would gain more by acting proactively first.

We wouldn't gain anything in my opinion.  NZ can only be a follower on this aspect of racing.  If NZ was really focused on horse welfare AND punter revenue it would be putting all its efforts into providing and fair tracks.  Anything else is just virtue signalling grandstanding hypocrisy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...