Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Jackfrost's DISGRACEFUL WHIPPING!!!


Thomass

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

That's rubbish Tank.  If you burgle the corner dairy the penalty is the same as burgling Harvey Norman.

I very much doubt that any more people saw the Grand National than those watching the Maiden at Pukekohe.

What's more the apparent victim in either race is still a horse.

The bigger the event, the bigger the penalty. Why, because jockeys are more inclined to transgress the rules because more money and prestige is involved, therefor a bigger deterrent is needed. Example Golden Slipper, Melbourne Cup, penalties reflect the status of the race because Jockeys are more inclined to do desperate things.

As for the analogy of the corner dairy and Harvey Norman I disagree. Try robbing a Bank as against the corner dairy and see if the sentences are the same. I remember the Great Train robbery in England. The robbers held up a train and made of with millions of pounds, nobody killed although some violence dished out to the train driver. Aggravated robbery causing injury and they got like 30 years. Now i'm sure if it had been a corner dairy instead of a train with millions of pounds the sentence would be nothing like 30years if the same paralle's applied. Nothing is equal in life when it comes to money.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

That's rubbish Tank.  If you burgle the corner dairy the penalty is the same as burgling Harvey Norman.

I very much doubt that any more people saw the Grand National than those watching the Maiden at Pukekohe.

What's more the apparent victim in either race is still a horse.

Not if you burgle the Dairy with a gun...

Higgins had a gun and left welts...

Universally penalties are loaded for superior races...

Do you want us to be pariahs again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, barryb said:

Mr Higgins previous breach sept 2017.

Hardly a repeat offender or a thrasher, dreaming Thomass & Chief is bang on above.

Sorry bogan Bazz missed this

He left welt marks...the Head on was a shocking site...

...he thrashed the horse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Thomass said:

Not if you burgle the Dairy with a gun...

Higgins had a gun and left welts...

Universally penalties are loaded for superior races...

Do you want us to be pariahs again?

Tank - do you just argue for the sake of arguing?  If Animal Welfare is the issue then it doesn't matter if the Dairy was burgled for a packet of cigs WITH a gun or Harvey Norman was burgled for an iPhone 10 WITH a gun!!!

Penalties shouldn't be LOADED for so called superior races over inferior races.  They should be the same in terms of suspension.  The horse doesn't know the difference!!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Universally they are...heard of The 'Deterrent' factor?

The Feds always get da Boys into the room before the MEL. Cup and tell them...

.".you better behave or else "

You can't have cowboys destroying the aintegrity of az black Type race can you...

..by treating it as another Maiden...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Thomass said:

Well Universally they are...heard of The 'Deterrent' factor?

The Feds always get da Boys into the room before the MEL. Cup and tell them...

.".you better behave or else "

You can't have cowboys destroying the aintegrity of az black Type race can you...

..by treating it as another Maiden...

You don't think having different rules for the elite vs the not so elite is a blight on the integrity of racing?  From an Animal Welfare perspective it doesn't matter if the race is a Maiden hack at Hokitika or the Derby.  

Perhaps the Stipes should get off their butts and talk to the jockeys before EVERY race!  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MarkyMark said:

were i the evidence of the horse having welts?

Oh f me..not another clown from the lock up...with Bazz and woddy..

were i??

Are you aware of the JCA...who are Racing's Judiciary?

Go to their site...read the judgment..and don't come back until you finish it you pillock...

  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Thomass said:

Oh f me..not another clown from the lock up...with Bazz and woddy..

were i??

Are you aware of the JCA...who are Racing's Judiciary?

Go to their site...read the judgment..and don't come back until you finish it you pillock...

i did, i read the report, unless i missed it, i didnt see any reference to there being welt marks. can you please copy and paste from the report were that is mentioned?

very familiar with JCA

no need for insults.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, MarkyMark said:

i did, i read the report, unless i missed it, i didnt see any reference to there being welt marks. can you please copy and paste from the report were that is mentioned?

very familiar with JCA

no need for insults.

I'm sorry but I dislike amateurs wasting moi's time..it's there in the report..

..and before any smarty pants says welts aren't inflamed whip marks...the def. for welts is "a raised mark"...inflamed is a raised mark...ok marky?

Mr McLaughlin produced as evidence photos taken by Racing Investigator, Mrs K Williams, of the rear left hindquarter of JACKFROST which clearly showed inflamed whip marks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Thomass said:

I'm sorry but I dislike amateurs wasting moi's time..it's there in the report..

..and before any smarty pants says welts aren't inflamed whip marks...the def. for welts is "a raised mark"...inflamed is a raised mark...ok marky?

Mr McLaughlin produced as evidence photos taken by Racing Investigator, Mrs K Williams, of the rear left hindquarter of JACKFROST which clearly showed inflamed whip marks.

yes, i did see this.

but this is not a welt, if it was a welt, it would be described by the jca as a welt.  secondly, with the sweat from the horse, and the agressive use of the whip on the horse by rider, no doubt this would have left "whip marks" on the horse. but welts, which is is basically causing a form of scaring on the horse, was not the case here.  you are twisting words to suit you own agenda.

i could hit you you with a a padded whip, this might leave an inflamed mark.

if it hit you with a stock whip, this would leave a welt.

in the context of what happened here, it is not a welt. 

i do not believe with padded whips, you could leave welt marks on a horse. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MarkyMark said:

yes, i did see this.

but this is not a welt, if it was a welt, it would be described by the jca as a welt.  secondly, with the sweat from the horse, and the agressive use of the whip on the horse by rider, no doubt this would have left "whip marks" on the horse. but welts, which is is basically causing a form of scaring on the horse, was not the case here.  you are twisting words to suit you own agenda.

i could hit you you with a a padded whip, this might leave an inflamed mark.

if it hit you with a stock whip, this would leave a welt.

in the context of what happened here, it is not a welt. 

i do not believe with padded whips, you could leave welt marks on a horse. 

As I thought...a time waster

You're playing semantics...is he your partner or something?

Do you want me to insert the def. for INFLAMED as well...or do you not think INFLAMED is RAISED?

welt
wɛlt/
noun
plural noun: welts
  1. 1. 
    a leather rim sewn round the edge of a shoe upper to which the sole is attached.
  2. 2. 
    a red, raised mark 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Thomass said:

As I thought...a time waster

You're playing semantics...is he your partner or something?

Do you want me to insert the def. for INFLAMED as well...or do you not think INFLAMED is RAISED?

welt
wɛlt/
noun
plural noun: welts
  1. 1. 
    a leather rim sewn round the edge of a shoe upper to which the sole is attached.
     
  2. 2. 
    a red, raised mark 

i know what a welt is, i just think you are twisting the meaning here. if you are familiar with a horses hide, it would take an almighty effort to leave  welt with a padded whip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does INFLAMED indicate to you Marky?

..have any of your body parts been inflamed lately... after being whipped by the local dom?  Or self inflicted perhaps?

And its nothing to do with the Encephalitis bogan Bazz has to deal with daily either...

is the WHOLE whip padded or just a third of it...do you know?

And does the jockey strike the animal with the padded bits...10/10 times?

...and finally have you observed the head on cam sham of the race yet?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting rather tiring your constant derogatory remarks about people you don’t know Thomass.

You must have suffered some horrific bullying when at school and now you can release so much of that hatred from the keyboard, must make you feel so powerful.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Thomass said:

What does INFLAMED indicate to you Marky?

..have any of your body parts been inflamed lately... after being whipped by the local dom?  Or self inflicted perhaps?

And its nothing to do with the Encephalitis bogan Bazz has to deal with daily either...

is the WHOLE whip padded or just a third of it...do you know?

And does the jockey strike the animal with the padded bits...10/10 times?

...and finally have you observed the head on cam sham of the race yet?

 

That's OK Thom, I feel in this instance we will just need to agree to disagree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, barryb said:

Getting rather tiring your constant derogatory remarks about people you don’t know Thomass.

You must have suffered some horrific bullying when at school and now you can release so much of that hatred from the keyboard, must make you feel so powerful.

You really should stay out of this Bazz man...

You said I made it up..because you couldn't be bothered reading the FACTS...

Thats all I deal in...You deal in attack after attack from a base of gross ignorance...

Ill hit you with facts again

"showed little remorse"

A bit like yours on this thread...after you got it wrong

Have you no shame?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...