-
Available Subscriptions
JCA
1,721 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 387 views
-
- 0 replies
- 391 views
-
- 0 replies
- 462 views
-
- 0 replies
- 444 views
-
- 0 replies
- 418 views
-
- 0 replies
- 438 views
-
- 0 replies
- 387 views
-
- 0 replies
- 464 views
-
- 0 replies
- 399 views
-
- 0 replies
- 495 views
-
- 0 replies
- 384 views
-
- 0 replies
- 444 views
-
- 0 replies
- 419 views
-
- 0 replies
- 386 views
-
- 0 replies
- 368 views
-
- 0 replies
- 405 views
-
- 0 replies
- 390 views
-
- 0 replies
- 494 views
-
- 0 replies
- 383 views
-
- 0 replies
- 362 views
-
- 0 replies
- 369 views
-
- 0 replies
- 445 views
-
- 0 replies
- 383 views
-
- 0 replies
- 393 views
-
- 0 replies
- 391 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By Murray Fish · Posted
https://www.dia.govt.nz/diawebsite.nsf/Files/Proactive-releases/$file/Cabinet-material-about-the-Betting-Duty-Savings-and-the-Point-of-Consumption-Charge-Distribution-Regulations.pdf -
By Murray Fish · Posted
CW 47TAB NZ and racing clubs Exempt income: racing organisations (1) An amount of income derived by any of the following bodies is exempt income: (a) TAB NZ: (b) New Zealand Thoroughbred Racing: (c) Harness Racing New Zealand: (d) the New Zealand Greyhound Racing Association (Incorporated): (e) the Racing Integrity Board: (f) Racing New Zealand. Exempt income: racing clubs (2) An amount of income derived by a racing club, as defined in section 5(1) of the Racing Industry Act 2020, is exempt income, if none of the club’s funds is used or is available to be used for the private pecuniary profit of a member of the club or an associate of a member. Defined in this Act: amount, associated person, exempt income, income Compare: 2004 No 35 s CW 40 Section CW 47 heading: amended, on 1 August 2020, by section 129 of the Racing Industry Act 2020 (2020 No 28). Section CW 47(1)(a): amended, on 1 August 2020, by section 129 of the Racing Industry Act 2020 (2020 No 28). Section CW 47(1)(e): inserted (with effect on 1 August 2020) on 30 March 2022, by section 58 of the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2021–22, GST, and Remedial Matters) Act 2022 (2022 No 10). Section CW 47(1)(f): inserted (with effect on 1 August 2020) on 30 March 2022, by section 58 of the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2021–22, GST, and Remedial Matters) Act 2022 (2022 No 10). Section CW 47(2): amended, on 1 August 2020, by section 129 of the Racing Industry Act 2020 (2020 No 28). -
By Murray Fish · Posted
He is a link to the article, in there are various hyperlinks leading to different reports mentioned in the article! https://theconversation.com/racing-enjoys-special-treatment-under-nz-gambling-laws-why-275778?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest from The Conversation for February 19 2026 - 3679337609&utm_content=Latest from The Conversation for February 19 2026 - 3679337609+CID_165c0e40c73ec21f80c4d602e0f3e095&utm_source=campaign_monitor&utm_term=Racing enjoys special treatment under NZ gambling laws Why -
By Murray Fish · Posted
Published: February 19, 2026 8.10am NZDT Despite the harm it is known to cause to a significant number of New Zealanders, the gambling industry as a whole is commonly defended for its contribution back to the community. Lotto NZ, for example, must redistribute all profits from Lotto in this way. Other forms of gambling are taxed or regulated differently, but most pay back a share of their profits in some form. Critics counter that such redistribution of gambling revenue does not fully address the harmful effects of problem gambling, or the fact that gambling itself isn’t distributed evenly across society. So, while 63% of electronic gambling machines – colloquially known as “pokies” – are located in areas of relatively high deprivation, just 12% of the proceeds from those machines go to those areas. But the racing industry is permitted to return almost all its profits back to the industry itself. In fact, the sector – covering horse racing and, until recently, greyhound racing – benefits from unique treatment. For in depth knowledge delivered free to your inbox. Get free newsletter This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Largely self-regulating The Gambling Act 2003 requires some minimum percentage of gambling proceeds to be returned to community organisations or other “authorised purposes”. But it also states that one of those “authorised purposes” is “promoting, controlling, and conducting race meetings under the Racing Industry Act 2020, including the payment of stakes”. The racing industry is the only sector with a specific provision in the act allowing it to return gambling proceeds to its own industry. This extends to most profits from electronic gaming machines located in TAB premises. Of all the forms of gambling, electronic gaming machines are generally recognised as generating the most harm. In 2025, the TAB’s monopoly on domestic, in-person betting on racing and sports was extended to cover online betting. This was intended to “maximise the financial returns to New Zealand’s racing industry and sports”. Typically, industries that cause harm are regulated in an attempt to minimise that harm. But the racing sector, via the TAB, is now largely self-regulating. Although a Racing Integrity Board regulates issues such as animal welfare, recent changes to the Racing Industry Act empowered horse and greyhound racers “to effectively govern their respective industries” and is “intended to provide the industry with independence from the Government”. Tax and levy exemptions The racing industry also does not pay income tax. Like other gambling entities, it does pay a problem gambling levy – in its case, 0.74% of betting profits or 1.24% of profits from gaming machines located in TAB outlets. Other gaming attracts additional levies: Lotto faces a 5.5% lotteries duty, casino operators pay a duty worth 4% of casino wins, and the levy on gaming machine profits is 20% (also paid by the TAB on machines in TAB premises). But the racing sector no longer has to pay such additional levies on racing. Until recently, a 4% “totalisator duty” was payable on all racing and sports betting, but this was repealed progressively to reach zero in 2021. The savings to the two betting categories from repealing the duty was NZ$14.5 million in 2024, of which $11.5 million went to racing. This saving for the industry is, of course, a direct cost to the Crown in the form of foregone tax revenues. The justification for the repeal was to help the racing industry become more financially self-sufficient. But levies and taxes are usually based on the nature of an activity – in particular, the harms it causes – and not the level of profit (or loss) it makes. Under the Racing Industry (Distribution from Betting Profits) Regulations 2021, the TAB must retain just 2.5% of betting profits for harm prevention and minimisation. The remainder is distributed to Racing New Zealand and Sports and Recreation New Zealand, in proportion to the revenues generated by racing or sports betting. In practice, this means most distributions accrue to the racing sector. For example, total distributions of racing and sports betting profits in 2024 were around $199 million, of which $195 million (98%) went to racing and $3.5 million (2%) went to community sports organisations. Time for a rethink of the rules For decades, ministers of racing have gone to great lengths to protect the industry. In the runup to the TAB getting its monopoly over online betting in 2025, official documents noted that “Ministerial expectations” were one of the reasons the changes must be “implemented as quickly as possible”. Government support for the racing sector is often justified by claims of improved employment opportunities, benefits to provincial communities and increases in the industry’s overall economic contribution. But these arguments could be made for most industries in New Zealand – industries that do not generate the harms gambling does. State support for the racing sector generally means there will be more gambling on racing. That in turn implies increased harm from gambling. We argue it’s time for a wholesale review of the tax and regulatory privileges that have accrued to this industry without any convincing rationale. Authors Lisa Marriott Professor of Taxation, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington Max Rashbrooke Research Associate, Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington Disclosure statement Lisa Marriott receives funding from the Gama Foundation Fund. Max Rashbrooke receives funding from the Gama Foundation Fund. Partners Te Herenga Waka — Victoria University of Wellington provides funding as a member of The Conversation NZ. View all partners DOI https://doi.org/10.64628/AA.q4mktgsmx -
Both Clubs are seriously in the shite financially and getting worse. Cambridge appears to be far worse than what I understood, and not looking great either! Winston really needs to step up to the plate and put it in the hands of a statutory manager as HRNZ are just not performing! The big stake money that ATC are being given would be better utilised in paying the interest on the debt and reducing the stakes up there! Is there anyone that has any confidence in HRNZ’s ability to govern harness racing in NZ? I wouldnt think there would be too many as things will come to a head and it will not be pretty for the industry!
-
-
Topics
-
