-
Available Subscriptions
BOAY Racing News
37,675 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 209 views
-
- 0 replies
- 190 views
-
- 0 replies
- 230 views
-
- 0 replies
- 194 views
-
- 0 replies
- 232 views
-
- 0 replies
- 231 views
-
- 0 replies
- 267 views
-
- 0 replies
- 239 views
-
- 0 replies
- 248 views
-
- 0 replies
- 215 views
-
- 0 replies
- 209 views
-
- 0 replies
- 221 views
-
- 0 replies
- 249 views
-
- 0 replies
- 242 views
-
- 0 replies
- 345 views
-
- 0 replies
- 351 views
-
- 0 replies
- 226 views
-
- 0 replies
- 259 views
-
- 0 replies
- 231 views
-
- 0 replies
- 250 views
-
- 0 replies
- 237 views
-
- 0 replies
- 244 views
-
- 0 replies
- 224 views
-
- 0 replies
- 217 views
-
- 0 replies
- 219 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By Murray Fish · Posted
needs to be taken around the back of the bike shed and given a bit of the old *#*$#$&**(# do they read it? Sadly, he has a serious case of Infantile Disorder, as yet! I'm not to sure that there is a cure for that sort of thing! The silver lining, is that he thrown some serious $$$$ at the game! -
Why don't they do that then? You still haven't defined what is and isn't abusive? -
By Murray Fish · Posted
tick! I've attempted to point this approach of increasing 'the take out' over a spectrum of bets ends up rather counter productive. It has been pointed out too via comments by some pro punters over the ditch in some articles about declining punting figures. Slowly but surely the average mug punter loses their money quicker! sigh, but propaganda is the one area of the industry that is increasing faster that anything else! -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Take Colin Wightman for example. Surely the administration have an obligation to protect their employees from the outlandish abuse he dishes out. Sure he handed in his license so he could do that but he is still an owner and still can be seen in the stables on racedays. -
By Murray Fish · Posted
Speaking to the head stipe down this way, I Know that he is serious about having tracks that are safe! Re how can you know that a track is safe before the 1st. It seems to me that there is a bit if a logical conundrum to over come! If you send them around and that proves that the track is Not Safe! then logically have you not practiced safe H&S? If you say send x riders and horses around before the first and that proves that they tracks is not safe, then again unsafe H&S? Also, if is before the 1st, how many do you send around so that a decent representative part of the track is covered? Will the problem be solved by having a mounted Robot weighted to the average jockey to pre test! again, how many do you send around? Who provides the horses for any testing? hence a serious conundrum in ever play! Does head office just provide large insurance polices for the riders and just send them around! What I do know! is that at certain tracks there were 'known' areas of x tracks that there were problems! Having the ear of certain trainers and riders I know that to be a fact! Then we have the old chestnut of many don't want to stick their heads above the parapet! one trainer who did speak up felt he got way to much flack for doing so, so stopped doing so!
-
-
Topics
-
