Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

The Rest of the World


82,331 topics in this forum

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 121 views
    • Journalists

    Jan. 31 Insights

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 153 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 146 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 150 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 197 views
    • Journalists

    Value Sires Part 6: Proven Sires

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 199 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 193 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 183 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 136 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 130 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 122 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 151 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 181 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 167 views
    • Journalists

    Who Do You ‘Like’ in the Swale?

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 124 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 142 views
    • Journalists

    Coal Front Sires First Foal

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 129 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 168 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 132 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 158 views
    • Journalists

    Holthaus Wins Eclipse 50 Contest

      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 168 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 163 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 138 views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 3k views
      • Journalists
    • 0 replies
    • 133 views

Announcements



  • Posts

    • Anyone wanting to support Coast racing would have sponsored Greymouth,  not Kumara,  district or not. Kumara has no infrastructure to speak of apart from newish tie ups, and as it is pakihi, there isn't much point in spending more money on a swamp. Greymouth,  on the other hand, has stabling, snd ran a raceday for Westland and probably still would, if not for that fourth day being dropped from the circuit.   As it is they still run the Miss Scenicland.
    • FFS - you deliberately left the other clause out which is specifically aligned to the objectives of the Club.  All other clauses are tested against those objectives. Geez spin around if you will.  One minute you are saying it should be returned to the community that built it now you are saying stuff history it is what the latest community wants!  When the assets were built up a long time before this latest generation came along!!   The realised assets should have gone to Kumara to further racing on the West Coast.  Not sold to developers to to reduce the rates of ratepayers of the Westland District Council. But just keep on perpetuating the poster child myth that the Westland Racing Club gave the finger to NZTR!  
    • Can't you read? The one I quote clearly says they would seek NZTR approval in accord with the one you cite. They have invested in Kumara btw. Loaned them money and sponsored races there and the other West Coast clubs. Unfortunately, times change and the 150 year old agenda you are promoting became unviable and unnecessary in the eyes of today's members.
    • So the 150+ year paramount objective of the Club is over ridden with no consideration to those members who developed the assets to pursue their chosen sport of racing. I think you are deliberating obfuscating the point to suit an ill advised agenda.  Racing AND the people of Westland could have benefited by the Club investing in Kumara which is officially in the District of Westland.   You also ignore the clause immediately above the one you quote: In the event of the Club being wound-up or put into liquidation in accordance with (a) above, the property and surplus assets of the Club after payment of the Club's liabilities and the expenses of the winding-up must be disposed of in accordance with section 27 of the Racing Act, for racing, public, charitable, or other purposes in the manner that the Club, with the approval of NZTR, determines.  
    • I think you miss the point. Once members resolved to not continue to pursue the object of racing at Hokitika, dispose of surplus assets, and dissolve the club, the original objectives were no longer. The constitution still said that in the event of dissolution the club would seek NZTR approval to dispose of surplus assets "for the benefit of the people of Westland", NOT for the benefit of racing.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...