-
Available Subscriptions
The Rest of the World
82,331 topics in this forum
-
- Journalists
Guineas The Aim For Bucanero Fuerte
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 205 views
-
- Journalists
Chaldean Ushers in a New Age at Juddmonte
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 196 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 179 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 201 views
-
-
- Journalists
In the Hot Seat: Hubie de Burgh
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 221 views
-
- Journalists
Golden Gate Trainer Ruled Against in Rape Case
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 231 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 186 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 270 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 185 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 201 views
-
-
- Journalists
Witwatersrand Shifts to Dirt in Forward Gal
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 190 views
-
- Journalists
O’Brien Pair To Race On In Hong Kong
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 234 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 186 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 194 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 189 views
-
-
- Journalists
Highfield Princess to Run Under New Training Duo
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 176 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 212 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 206 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 202 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 180 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 204 views
-
-
- Journalists
Mucho Macho Man to Stand at Adena Springs
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 219 views
-
- Journalists
Japan Rules as the JRA Turns 70
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 244 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 217 views
-
-
- Journalists
2024 Kentucky Derby Trophy Unveiled
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 267 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
Anyone wanting to support Coast racing would have sponsored Greymouth, not Kumara, district or not. Kumara has no infrastructure to speak of apart from newish tie ups, and as it is pakihi, there isn't much point in spending more money on a swamp. Greymouth, on the other hand, has stabling, snd ran a raceday for Westland and probably still would, if not for that fourth day being dropped from the circuit. As it is they still run the Miss Scenicland. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
FFS - you deliberately left the other clause out which is specifically aligned to the objectives of the Club. All other clauses are tested against those objectives. Geez spin around if you will. One minute you are saying it should be returned to the community that built it now you are saying stuff history it is what the latest community wants! When the assets were built up a long time before this latest generation came along!! The realised assets should have gone to Kumara to further racing on the West Coast. Not sold to developers to to reduce the rates of ratepayers of the Westland District Council. But just keep on perpetuating the poster child myth that the Westland Racing Club gave the finger to NZTR! -
Can't you read? The one I quote clearly says they would seek NZTR approval in accord with the one you cite. They have invested in Kumara btw. Loaned them money and sponsored races there and the other West Coast clubs. Unfortunately, times change and the 150 year old agenda you are promoting became unviable and unnecessary in the eyes of today's members. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
So the 150+ year paramount objective of the Club is over ridden with no consideration to those members who developed the assets to pursue their chosen sport of racing. I think you are deliberating obfuscating the point to suit an ill advised agenda. Racing AND the people of Westland could have benefited by the Club investing in Kumara which is officially in the District of Westland. You also ignore the clause immediately above the one you quote: In the event of the Club being wound-up or put into liquidation in accordance with (a) above, the property and surplus assets of the Club after payment of the Club's liabilities and the expenses of the winding-up must be disposed of in accordance with section 27 of the Racing Act, for racing, public, charitable, or other purposes in the manner that the Club, with the approval of NZTR, determines. -
I think you miss the point. Once members resolved to not continue to pursue the object of racing at Hokitika, dispose of surplus assets, and dissolve the club, the original objectives were no longer. The constitution still said that in the event of dissolution the club would seek NZTR approval to dispose of surplus assets "for the benefit of the people of Westland", NOT for the benefit of racing.
-
-
Topics
-
