-
Available Subscriptions
Singapore News
2,156 topics in this forum
-
- Journalists
Track conditions and course scratchings July 19
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 315 views
-
- Journalists
Noh in Elite company at first Derby ride
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 400 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratching July 19
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 319 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 328 views
-
-
- Journalists
Early scratching July 21
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 335 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 324 views
-
-
- Journalists
Singapore Derby 2019 Post Position Draw
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 325 views
-
- Journalists
Glasgow ready to go
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 372 views
-
- Journalists
Kok's 2YO draws out, harder to Count on
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 349 views
-
- Journalists
Mr Malek is Azzopardi's Derby week special
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 331 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 346 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 337 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 342 views
-
-
- Journalists
Horses' test results July 13 & 15
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 323 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 497 views
-
-
- Journalists
Another brave effort for Lim's Cruiser in UK
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 527 views
-
- Journalists
Thompson, Zawari, S John suspended
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 598 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 324 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 300 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 300 views
-
-
- Journalists
Track conditions and course scratchings July 12
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 305 views
-
- Journalists
Horses' body weights July 12
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 322 views
-
- Journalists
Duric stood down for Friday meeting
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 310 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratchings July 12
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 316 views
-
- Journalists
Freedman eyes Derby Dozen with party of five
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 501 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By PeterLambFan · Posted
Darn so we won’t hear about the Broadster dancing in his lounge as a dog hits front as of August. -
what . There wouldn't be a paid job going where an employee could view pornography on work equipment. would be grounds for (summary) instant dismissal as is a case of serious misconduct. (yes the brothels get away with it I spose ) Of course a 'dismissal procedure' must be followed to avoid any 'Unfair Dismissal ' claims by some gold seeking lawyer , just as in other serious misconduct issues under employment Law such as Theft, physical violence, Gross negligence or serious insubordination. they are not worthy of keeping on staff at any business . unfortunately in this day and age the legal system is full of claims of serious Sexual harassment. It seems to come in all shapes and forms these days that lead to all sorts of issues. Staff seeing someone with pictures on a screen of a sexual nature, is not only Very poor taste, terribly poor ethically, but also a type of harassment to those that know it's going on, and would effect productivity and co-operation in the workplace. It is incredibly easy to prove from the hard drive. Dismiss them instantly. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You obvuously have no understamding of employment law. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Wrong on all counts. You are as bad as @curious reading what you want to read as opposed to distilling the facts. You make the assumption he tried to hide it. What if he wasn't asked? In any case what was he hiding? That he watched porn on his office computer? If you are talking about your post then not "clever" more salacious innuendo unbecoming of someone of intellect. Given both you and @curious haven't yet identified the core issue with the case I can say that neither of you would meet your expectations of an RIB Stipe. Now what does that highlight? -
Chief Mickey Mouse?
-
-
Topics
-
