-
Available Subscriptions
Singapore News
2,156 topics in this forum
-
- Journalists
Woodworth suspended three days
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 311 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 314 views
-
-
- Journalists
Van der Merwe, WH Kok suspended
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 347 views
-
- Journalists
Grand Koonta blitzes rivals
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 289 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 291 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 296 views
-
-
- Journalists
Meagher puts Rehaizat on another winner
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 284 views
-
- Journalists
Early treble shows who's the Boss
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 289 views
-
- Journalists
Horses' body weights May 12
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 328 views
-
- Journalists
Track conditions and course scratchings May 12
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 284 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratchings May 12
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 299 views
-
- Journalists
Zy boots home first Kranji double
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 311 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 301 views
-
-
- Journalists
Perfect three from three for Baertschiger
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 296 views
-
- Journalists
Horses' body weights May 10
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 299 views
-
- Journalists
Track conditions and course scratchings May 10
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 288 views
-
- Journalists
Circuit Land out, Freedman on juggling Mission
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 286 views
-
- Journalists
No Kranji Mile Joy for Mikki
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 317 views
-
- Journalists
Peters has Grand Koonta in great nick
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 327 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratching May 12
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 302 views
-
- Journalists
Hanafi disqualified one year
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 323 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 305 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 307 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 326 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 300 views
-
Announcements
-
Posts
-
Oh dear. Those voices in your head again. -
Very well put Freda. That's it in a nutshell.
-
As is often the case, the point has floated past you. The porn matter is a by-the-by. If he wants to watch on his own computer and in his own time, that's his business. It is the context of the event(s) and the lack of integrity inherent in his behavior and the attempts to both dodge consequences and maintain employment in a situation where integrity is not just a like-to-have, it is imperative. If he can't monitor his own, he has no right to sit in judgement on others. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Really? Since when did you join the convent? Or is it something in that Racecourse Hotel rum? -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
We are assuming they didn't know. I find it hard to believe, even though the Law Society would be one of the better agencies to maintain privacy, that someone in the RIB didn't know. BTW the main issue that undid him with the Law Society wasn't the misconduct itself which was minor but the fact that he didn't have the policy, processes and procedures in place to handle workplace misconduct as required by the Law Society. This point seems to fly past most online commentators. In my opinion that is the reason he probably shouldn't be employed at the RIB. I can't work out why the Office Manager(s) didn't have this covered after 7 years. Everything was all good until the employer/employee relationship broke down then the complaint was made. I've seen that happen in employement cases many many times.
-
-
Topics
-
