-
Available Subscriptions
Singapore News
2,156 topics in this forum
-
- Journalists
Horses' body weights November 10
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 597 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 623 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 641 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 633 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 562 views
-
-
- Journalists
Siam Blue Vanda scores hard-fought win
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 644 views
-
- Journalists
Pindus no more second best
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 640 views
-
- Journalists
Horses' body weights November 8
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 625 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratching November 8
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 878 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 637 views
-
-
- Journalists
Blinkers to sharpen up Le Grange 3YO duo
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 609 views
-
- Journalists
New Royalty silks fit for a King
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 649 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratching November 10
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 600 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 603 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 579 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 658 views
-
-
- Journalists
Brown has one shot at second Gold Strike
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 603 views
-
- Journalists
Maia to ride at EW Barker Trophy meeting
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 552 views
-
- Journalists
QEII Cup run puts Count in Gold mix
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 615 views
-
- Journalists
Ezekiel has a lethal weapon in Barker
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 580 views
-
- Journalists
Updates on Stewards' follow-ups to Friday and Sunday meetings, Zyrul suspended four days
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 725 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 610 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 616 views
-
-
- Journalists
Horses' test results November 2
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 559 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 608 views
-
Announcements
-
Posts
-
Yes, and yes. My read is your latter point is the crux of the case. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
You mean an Order in Council. Essentially you are agreeing with my first point that there is possibly only one arguable point of law. However arguably there is nothing in the Act that stops NZTR from removing race dates nor is there anything in the Act that directs NZTR to give a specific number of race dates to anyone. So what will Avondale argue with? -
My take from it is the AJC want to test if NZTR have a right to remove their race dates, if the purpose is so that they can then try to get a Council Order to take over a community asset.
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Why? What do you "take from the article"? Or are we supposed to guess? Regardless if two years ago the AJC and NZTR signed a MOU to determine what would happen once racing ceased at Avondale isn't that an admission by Avondale that racing would cease? -
I doubt either would come into the thrust of the case based on what I take from that article, but that's all I know.
-
-
Topics
-
