-
Available Subscriptions
Singapore News
2,156 topics in this forum
-
- Journalists
Early scratching April 27
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 522 views
-
- Journalists
Maximus sticks to the Polytrack circus he knows
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 488 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 466 views
-
-
- Journalists
Sprint or Mile a Gray area for Lim's Cruiser
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 473 views
-
- Journalists
Sky Rocket ready to explore new heights
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 494 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 494 views
-
-
- Journalists
CC Wong suspended two days
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 559 views
-
- Journalists
Nepean takes one step closer to Derby
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 550 views
-
- Journalists
First Choice scores hard-fought win in Class 3
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 494 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 465 views
-
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 2.5k views
-
-
- Journalists
Track conditions and course scratchings April 24
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 500 views
-
- Journalists
Horses' body weights April 24
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 531 views
-
- Journalists
More than just giggles if Whakaaria Mai scores
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 540 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratchings April 24
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 512 views
-
- Journalists
Early scratchings April 24
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 619 views
-
- Journalists
Horse's test results April 21
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 508 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 1.9k views
-
-
- Journalists
Curvature lines up three wins in a row
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 559 views
-
- Journalists
Kok toys with Guineas plans after Terrific win
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 615 views
-
- Journalists
Good Catch no more a bridesmaid
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 502 views
-
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 550 views
-
-
- Journalists
Track conditions and course scratchings April 22
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 505 views
-
- Journalists
Horses' body weights April 22
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 512 views
-
- Journalists
No early scratchings April 22
-
- Journalists
- 0 replies
- 510 views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
By Wandering Eyes · Posted
Talented three-year-old Ammirati (NZ) (Savabeel) was a notable absentee from Saturday’s Gr.2 Eagle Technology Avondale Guineas (2100m) acceptances, with trainer Stephen Marsh confirming the sale of the gelding to Hong Kong. A three-time winner from eight starts, the son of Savabeel had been an impressive last-start winner of the Listed Gingernuts Salver (2100m) at Ellerslie and a $10 chance for the Gr.1 New Zealand Derby (2400m) at the same venue in just over a fortnight. The gelding also boasts a dramatic victory in the Gr.3 Wellington Stakes (1600m) at Otaki in late November and an eye-catching fifth placing in the Gr. 2 Levin Classic (1400m) at Trentham for owners Hawridge Developments Ltd, Jamieson Park Ltd and Lib Petagna’s JML Bloodstock Ltd. A $450,000 yearling purchase by Bruce Perry Bloodstock from Waikato Stud’s 2023 Karaka draft, Ammirati is out of the winning Pins mare Happily. The versatile galloper is likely to join the stable of David Eustace in Hong Kong. View the full article -
the point we often make gamma is HRNZ should have come up with a workable,financialy sustainable vision for the future of north island and auckland harness racing.They have had years to do it now. people don't believe they have. yes hrnz are trying. The atc club were trying when they did the apartment complexs. in the end what people care about is whether policy and decision making is good,bad or indifferent.Its the poor policy and decision making which is the reason for any criticism. no one understands why a business wouldn't want to restructure in a way that ensures their future.Thats what i think people struggle most with when it comes to hrnz policy towards the atc. -
4 hours according to google maps. -
By Murray Fish · Posted
Personally, I was keen to have a go at beating some of the games when the carnival came to town! Especially those ones with the Arms Moving across.. later, the local Catholic School would run a massive Gambling Event, Crown and Anchor... Gambling for children? Why Australia should consider regulating blind box toys like Labubu If you walk through any major shopping mall in Australia, chances are you’ll encounter products and experiences that are uncomfortably similar to gambling – yet they are available to anyone, including children. Our soon-to-be-published research has found claw machines, blind boxes and toy capsule machines have become pervasive in the spaces families frequent – from the shops, to the movies, to the pub. A claw machine in a major shopping precinct in Melbourne. Author provided We call these products and experiences gamble-play media. They rely on and profit from risk-taking, and encourage intense, continuous playful consumption in the quest to “win” a desired item. While claw machines have been a part of Australia’s consumer culture for a long time, blind boxes are the most recent gamble-play media to become mainstream. In Singapore, lawmakers and consumer advocates are pushing to regulate blind boxes due to the gambling inducement risks they carry, according to a written address to parliament from Home Affairs Minister Kasiviswanathan Shanmugam. It may be time for Australia to contemplate a similar move, given our nation’s insidious gambling culture and tendency towards problem gambling. Our mission is to share knowledge and inform decisions. About us Indeed, gambling among children has become a national crisis, with a report from the Australia Institute highlighting 30% of 12–17 year-olds gamble at least once per year. The blind box phenomenon Blind boxes are products (usually toys) sealed in opaque packaging. The contents can’t be revealed until after a box is purchased. Most are sold as part of larger collections, many of which contain coveted “rare” items. Buyers are enticed to pay for the chance to obtain these “high-value” items. Blind boxes at a major retailer in Melbourne. Authors provided Globally, blind boxes are projected to reach annual profits of US$24.2 billion (about A$34 billion) by 2033. Anyone who visits a major shopping precinct will likely see rows upon rows of boxes displaying Labubus (a multi billion-dollar obsession), Sanrio characters, and other collectibles from children’s or family franchises such as Sesame Street, Harry Potter, Toy Story and the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Japanese characters such as Mofusand and Sonny Angels are particularly appealing to Gen Z and Gen Alpha buyers. Online, content creators use these products in “toy unboxing” videos, which have long been popular on platforms such as YouTube and TikTok. This content focuses on the tactile pleasures of unwrapping toys, particularly “surprise” toys – the crinkling of paper, the tapping of nails on boxes, and the caressing of the treasured item once it’s finally unveiled. There are hundreds of thousands of videos of influencers unboxing blind box toys across YouTube, TikTok and Instagram, many of which help to generate hype around new products or high-profile collaborations. Apart from major retailers such as Pop Mart and Miniso, blind boxes are also available in vending machines, and pop-up and bargain variety stores (which may stock knock-off versions). Gambling for children? The emotional states triggered by blind boxes are not dissimilar to those experienced by people who gamble on slot machines or pokies: anticipation, randomness, occasional joy and frequent disappointment. These experiences can become addictive. Blind boxes are designed to offer a rush over the possibility of an (unlikely) big win, and the subsequent chasing of this feeling. As our research highlights, these are the dynamics of gamble-play. There are preliminary indications that using gamble-play devices such as claw machines and coin pushers in the formative years can lead to problems with gambling in adulthood. However, more research is needed to understand how children experience risk, randomness, and loss and reward mechanisms in the context of seemingly innocuous gamble-play products. Our ongoing research explores if and how gamble-play can be a gateway to adult gambling. Some manufacturers list the odds of winning and age guidelines in small print on the boxes. For instance, they may include a label suggesting the product is not for children under 8, or under 12. But these labelling practices are inconsistent, unclear and unregulated. The reason some blind boxes are labelled this way is because of industry guidelines in China, from where many of these products are imported. Since 2023, China has restricted the sale of blind boxes to children under 8. Nonetheless, concerns around blind box addiction among China’s children persist. Singapore sets an example Singaporean legislators and consumer advocates are moving to regulate blind boxes, arguing they are too similar to gambling. The proposed laws are still being devised. It’s unclear whether they will fall under existing gambling laws or require new legislation – but they could include mandating that manufacturers clearly disclose the odds of getting each product, and apply and enforce age restrictions. Blind boxes have even started making small waves in Australian politics. In June of last year, Victorian Legislative Council member Aiv Puglielli said: instead of buying one, maybe you buy two or three, increasing your chances of securing the design that you want. It kind of sounds like gambling, because it is gambling. Randomised rewards are not exclusive to the blind box market: they are also used as incentives by fast food chains and supermarkets. In some cases, items such as rare Woolworths’ Disney Ooshies can be resold for thousands. Australian legislators have already moved to regulate and classify gambling-like content in video games, such as loot boxes and simulated gambling. Blind boxes and other gamble-play media rely on the same mechanisms of seduction – and therefore also demand scrutiny. Published: February 19, 2026 8.09am NZDT Authors César Albarrán-Torres Associate professor, Swinburne University of Technology Jessica Balanzategui Associate Professor in Media, RMIT University Disclosure statement César Albarrán-Torres receives funding from the Australian Research Council. Jessica Balanzategui receives funding from the Australian Research Council and the Australian Children's Television Foundation. Partners RMIT University and Swinburne University of Technology provide funding as members of The Conversation AU. View all partners DOI https://doi.org/10.64628/AA.hyc6ktxrp We believe in the free flow of information Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence. Republish this article Share article Print article https://theconversation.com/gambling-for-children-why-australia-should-consider-regulating-blind-box-toys-like-labubu-276163?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest from The Conversation for February 19 2026 - 3679337609&utm_content=Latest from The Conversation for February 19 2026 - 3679337609+CID_165c0e40c73ec21f80c4d602e0f3e095&utm_source=campaign_monitor&utm_term=Gambling for children Why Australia should consider regulating blind box toys like Labubu -
By Nowornever · Posted
Ideal run tonight... Pace was on and he had plenty of room when the field spread out. Too good for them at nice money.
-
-
Topics
-
