Chief Stipe

Put it another way Huey I'm sure the ex-DBA couldn't visually assess a horse's condition. Amazing how much time some people spend online when they work for someone else. Another advantage of a VPN.

Huey - Curious and the ex-DBA rely on processing comparatively large amounts of data and adjusting their algorithms based on what must be subjective assessments of track conditions. They then look for value by pricing fields themselves (most probably automatically using an algorithm based on their assessments) and looking for where the price is overs. Then playing small %'s. For example if a horse they value at 25 to 1 is paying 50 to 1 they will back it. Sounds as boring as bat shit to me. But the ex-DBA tells us he makes money doing it.

Rule Number(s): 870(3) Breaking Horse RegulationsFollowing the running of Race 1 NZ Bloodstock Mobile Trot Information A09850 was filed by Stipendiary Steward Mr V Munro with the Judicial Committee. It was alleged that Kiwi Heir broke in excess of 50 metres in the final 200 metres of the race. Mr Paisley the trainer of the horse and representing the ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): Rule 638(1)(d)Following the running of the SHOWTECHNIX 1200 an Information was lodged by Stipendiary Steward Mr B Jones against Apprentice Jockey Miss T Newman alleging that Miss Newman as the Rider of LUNA VAARA allowed her mount to shift in at about the 950 metres mark when not clear of LET'S DO THIS (Rider S McKay) ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): 869(2) & Whip & Rein RegulationsThis is a defended hearing arising from the running of Race 5, the Woodlands Stud Caduceus Classic Mobile Pace (Group 1). An Information was filed by Senior Stipendiary Steward, Mr Mulcay, alleging Licensed Driver, Ms S Ottley (LA ROSA) used her whip with more than a wrist flicking motion in the home ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): 869(2) & Whip & Rein RegulationsThis is a defended hearing arising from the running of Race 5, the Woodlands Stud Caduceus Classic Mobile Pace (Group 1). An Information was filed by Senior Stipendiary Steward, Mr Mulcay, alleging Licensed Driver, Mr T Williams (BETTOR TWIST) used his whip with more than a wrist flicking motion in the ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): Rule 638(1)(d)Following the running of the DON GRIFFITHS LIMITED DRILLING CONTRACTOR 1200 an Information was lodged by Stipendiary Steward Mr B Jones against Class A Rider Mr MJ McNab alleging that Mr McNab as the Rider of HONEY HONEY angled out passing the 250 metres mark when not clear of LUSTFUL LADY (Rider T ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Assessed against what parameters? Benchmarks? I accept different tracks are no different than different track conditions but you must compare performances within each track population. Easy to do in Hong Kong but in NZ? Wouldn't you be stuffed if horses moved entirely randomly amongst all tracks?

I thought you did your performance assessments within the race? How can you compare times between different tracks when you have no idea what the condition of each track when it was raced? That is you cannot rely on penetrometer readings. For example where do you rate the performance of the maiden that ran 1:07 in a trial at Riccarton versus any other race course in the country? Thomass will tell us that the maiden that runs 1:07 at Riccarton is not as good as any North Island maidens!

They are combining the RIU and the JCA to form a mega-department. No doubt Goober sorry Godber will get a pay rise as will Grim.

Thomass you are repeating the same shyte over and over again. Do you have any other songs in you play book? But before I close these repetitive crap down AGAIN can you give us some examples of where North Island horses have moved to the South Island and performed above their rating in comparison to the horses they were racing against?

How do you it hadn't been "taught" before race?

Ease up - that's a bit harsh. Are you another armchair driver?

Have you got anything good at all to say about New Zealand Harness? Are you stuck in the turnstile at Forbury and can't get out?

Thanks for posting Andrew. I don't know much about you but my family had a bit to do with Jessica's parent's in the 80's through our horses. I met Paul on several occasions when he started out with Ted Lowe at Hinds and on his visits to Nelson for the race meetings. Doesn't Paul have the use of Ted's colours? Anyway if Jessica has inherited the honesty and hard working attitude of her parents then I'd back her over all her critics. Easy to drive a horse from your armchair with a beer in the cup holder!

Where's your evidence?

Totally stupid. This Penn National rubbish continues to get served up - why I have no idea.

Perhaps the horse hadn't seen the green stuff before.

Seems the word "fraud" has expanded in its definition! However Curious Thomass isn't alone in his belief. I'm sure some breeders, owners and trainers also adhere to it. That in itself explains some of the problems we see in the industry.

Don't you walk one of those wheels around the course a couple of horse widths out from the rail? With regard to the penetrometer I'm convinced that the measurements at Riccarton are off.

Thanks Pitty. That explains why a D4 at Riccarton is different from a D4 at Reefton. Also explains why a maiden can run 1:07 on a D4. Now you are also inferring that all penetrometers are the same and don't alter in terms of their accuracy over time and use. I find that hard to believe.

There should be statutory minimum bet limits especially if the Government and the Industry Administrators wish to further enforce a monopoly position. Not that I think they can do that effectively!

You are wasting your time Curious. Thomass has never understood this. An R65 is an R65 on any day of the week. You don't have a 'B' Grade R65 on a monday and an 'A' Grade R65 on a Saturday. Certainly the handicapper doesn't see it that way otherwise the system would be even more stuffed up than it is!

I think PlanB and their group of scientists along with their colleagues in other parts of the world provide a balanced view of the pandemic based on good evidence based research. Unlike the celebrity styled scientists of dubious backgrounds that advise our NZ Government. However I understand that I have an advantage having been formally trained in the scientific method and evidence based research.

But what you write indicates that you don't really know what you are talking about. Big deal. You are not even trained to be a good Business Intelligence Analyst. Quite frankly I've yet to meet a good one! A three year degree in Computer Science (did you finish it?) falls well short in training for it. Certainly your inability to understand evidence based research (and no training in it) and to isolate your biased thinking to enable the clear determination of "insights" makes you a crap BIA. You should have stuck to selling and designing MS SQL systems - a bit of bullshit goes a long way in that game! Which have nothing to do with differences in their respective pandemic management approaches. However you are unable to distil those factors and find the key relationships. You only present macro indicators without adjusting for the unique characteristics of the respective economies which are significantly different. You first raised the relative increases/decreases in Government debt not I. Then the moment I pointed out that metric was useless as a measure you went on another tangent. Quite frankly I won't be giving any credence to any business intelligence "insights" you may give on the comparative economic performances of Nordic countries.