Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

Chief Stipe

Administrators
  • Posts

    484,454
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    662

Everything posted by Chief Stipe

  1. Here is the resume of Hon J W Gendall QC - referred to as a twat by Short Stuff. https://www.kiwisfirst.com/judge-file-index/high-court-justice-warwick-gendall/
  2. Not wishing to be a totally negative bastard but...... Unless an AWT is groomed correctly for the relevant conditions then it can be just has harmful to a horse. I just can't seen how in a climate such as Canterbury's (more so Awapuni) that we will get that management right. I can just see the arguments down at the track between the likes of Freda and Pitty - the former likes a bit of give in the ground and Pitty likes it hard. You can have either at just about anytime depending on how you groom an AWT.
  3. Also if he wasn't allowed to use social media platforms to launch his rants and tirades from then he would be confined to pub talk. It is hypocrisy at its worst to give him a platform to launch from and then justify it by saying "like him or hate him he's great for traffic".
  4. The people he attacks have family too. The difference is he has a choice not to do what he does.
  5. If you keep that up you might be able to take over from Leo Molloy as a JCA "lay advocate." You forgot to add though that there is a process to follow which enables the redaction of any offensive material before court action.
  6. Rule Number(s): 869(2)Following the running of race 1 an information was filed by Stipendiary Steward, Mr P Williams, against Amateur Driver, Mr A Fitzgerald, alleging that as the driver of JENABELLA in the race, “used his whip on more occasions than permitted by clause (b) of the whip regulations”. Mr Fitzgerald had signed ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
  7. Rule Number(s): 869(A)(2)Following the running of Race 1, a protest was lodged by Mrs C Negus the Driver of FOUR STARZZZ SHIRAZ placed fifth by the Judge against the winner of the race RAZCAL ALLEY driven by Ms S Wigg. The details of the alleged interference were that RAZCAL ALLEY shifted inwards over the final stages of the ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
  8. I would havd thought he hasn't done his sentencing chances much good by publicly having a go at Justice Gendall.
  9. I guess one good thing about the JCA outcome is he won't be acting as "a lay advocate." I was reading the JCA reports today and he initially even had an oar in the Hollie Wynyard case. Actually without him she and the RIU came to a reasonable and fair solution.
  10. But how is there a connection between that and the JCA decision? I'm surprised Comic Dog hasn't banned him but "he is good for traffic."
  11. What he has another one? I thought it was done and dusted.
  12. Well you were full of praise for RITA and McKenzie before the Government bailout of their insolvency. Has your "source" dried up? Or is the truth inconvenient? As for being moderated - currently you aren't. Respect that.
  13. So any word on how much the Government is going to flick to the TAB this time? Or has a miraculous recovery occurred? Any news on Awapuni and Riccartons fund raising for the extra $6-10m each for their AWT's?
  14. So let's make this all about you shall we Greg (or whoever you are). You wouldn't know the meaning of hypocrisy and you know full well why you were moderated. Back to the subject here - I'm concerned that someone is calling themselves Michael House when in fact they may well not be. Impersonating someone and using a real name is more important to me than your sycophantic rants. BTW how's your mate McKenzie doing?
  15. Short Stuff has posted the following - can anyone tell me how Gendall's judgement supports that view? Also why did his QC not appear for him? Why was did he present no evidence? Was there any? The other thing no one can understand is why Gendall told my QC that “ the truth was not relevant “ then advised me at the hearing that I “ could not use the truth as a defence “ That’s a right head scratcher there because he’s effectively arguing that by signing ownership papers you surrender all your rights under NZ law, including but not limited to the BOR and freedom of speech
  16. You haven't responded to my email.
  17. Rule Number(s): 869(2)- Whip Regulation (b)Following the running of Race 2, the Lamb and Hayward Mobile Pace, an Information was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward, Mr N Ydgren against Licensed Junior Horsewoman, Miss O Thornley, alleging a breach of Rule 869(2) in that she used her whip on more occasions than permitted by Clause (b) of the Use ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
  18. Rule Number(s): 638(3)(b)(ii)Following the running of Race 8, the Valachi Downs, an Information was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward, Mr J Oatham, against Jockey (Class A), Mr R Cuneen, alleging that, as the rider of HE KIN FLY in the race, he used his whip excessively prior to the 100m. Mr Cuneen was present at the hearing of ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
  19. Rule Number(s): 638(1(d)Following the running of Race 2, the Cochranes of Canterbury Maiden, an Information was filed by Chief Stipendiary Steward, Mr J Oatham, against Class B rider, Mr K Asano, in that he allowed his mount HIGHLY POLISHED to shift out over the concluding stages, crowding and checking GOODANYA and inconveniencing ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
  20. Rule Number(s): 638(1)(d)Following the running of Race 8 (Moemoea Park 1200), Information No. A12924 was filed with the Judicial Committee. It was alleged by the Informant, that Ms Burden allowed her mount FLEURGUNDY to shift in near the 900m when insufficiently clear of SAINT CROIX, RUKUHIA and PALAMEDES which were all hampered ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
  21. Rule Number(s): 638 (1)(d) - Careless riding; 638(3)(b)(ii) – Excessive use of whipThese two charges arise from the running of Race 8, the Te Aroha Veterinary Services 1400. Stipendiary Steward Mr Coles filed the two Information’s pursuant to Rules 638 (1)(d) and 638(3)(b)(ii) alleging the rider of MAKABAR (Mr Beemud) rode carelessly and used his whip excessively. The particulars of ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
  22. What's more he thinks that the NZ Herald were really interested in HIS case! The only interest that rag has when it comes to racing is to run it down. Short stuff is so dumb that he can't see that. The other one provides him a forum to do it from. Go figure!
  23. Yes well I've seen it all before with him. Even had the misfortune of being dragged into some of his previous efforts when I administered and maintained Channel X.
  24. Would it be fair to say that Justice Gendall "dismantled" the little fella not the other way around?
  25. Joe - I've posted the two JCA decisions. Reading these gives a different perspective to what we have been told be the defendent. NO EVIDENCE was produced in support of his demand for Gendall to be excused.
×
×
  • Create New...