Chief Stipe

Apparently a jockey saying he used a cattle prod 50 years ago is a "slur on every trainer".....what a load of bollocks.

Guess who: "I bought.RC so I could control what was being said about me".

I will follow through that's the difference here at BOAY.

Rule Number(s): 865(2)Following the running of Race 8 the “Pinelea Farm / Terror To Love Mobile Pace” an Information was filed by Stipendiary Steward Mr S Renault alleging a breach of Rule 865(2) by Trainer Mr R Dunn. The information alleged, Horse Kotare Yolande presented without notified gear (pacifier). Mr Dunn had signed ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): 870(5) and the Breaking Horses RegulationsFollowing the running of race 5, the Hazletts Rural Trot, an information instigating a protest was filed by Stipendiary Steward Mr S Renault, against HIGHLAND STAR (G Smith), placed 1st by the judge, on the grounds that it “broke prior to, and over the line and was lapped on by horses number 12, 3 , ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): 869(2)Following the running of Race 1 the “Tavern Harewood Amateur Drivers Mobile Pace” an Information was filed by Stipendiary Steward Mr S Renault alleging a breach of Rule 869(2) by Amateur Driver Mr M Stratford. The information alleged, You used your whip on more occasions than permitted by Clause (b) ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): 869(2)Following the running of Race 6, the “Addington Road Stables Mobile Pace”, Information A10590 was filed by Senior Stipendiary Steward Mr J Muirhead against Open Horseman Mr S Dickson alleging “he used his whip on more occasions than permitted under Clause (b) (of the Use of Whip Regulations) when driving ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Rule Number(s): 869(2)Following the running of Race 5, the “Coast Bar Services Mobile Pace”, Information A10589 was filed by Senior Stipendiary Steward Mr J Muirhead against Open Horseman Mr P Fleming alleging “he used his whip inside the final 400m on more occasions than permitted under Clause (b) of the Use of Whip Regulations ... (Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article

Weasel I miss your mustelid pics

Nothing BUT they have an employer management responsibility to protect their employees from digital harm.

Well done Reefton with winning the Grp 3 Taranaki Cup. You and I are now in the same esteemed company of owner a winner of the Taranaki Cup. Although when the horse I had a 10% share in (Madame Shinko) won it it was 2000m in distance and the field was very much stronger in 2006. We pulled off an incredible betting coup that day and the bookies must have hurt for weeks. We all backed her in from 20's to 5's. I know this is a little silly of me but one of the reasons I'm publically congratulating you is that someone who shall be nameless has labelled me a "niller, who has done nothing in racing" and has lied about having a Grp winner. She was my first horse and I went to all 52 starts including two in Brisbane. She was not unlike Consensus - a tough filly and mare who loved the top of the ground. When she won that day the track was rated an F1. As nearly all the field lined across the track about 150m out Darin Tyequin the commentator said - "....and they'll all lined up like Custers last stand"... I was the only one of the 17 strong syndicate on course and had the pleasure of leading her in, accepting the cup and giving a speech.

Yes it is a shame Newmarket. I didn't mean to offend Hesi. However call me a pig headed fool if you wish but I wanted to stand firm on a certain point. I asked Thomass if he would be OK in taking a holiday. I didn't have the time nor the energy to manage what seem a shyte fight on multi fronts. I also wanted to see the impact of Thomass not being around and to run the poll which I only did with Thomass's approval. In saying that nothing startling transpired and it seemed to be "onwards and upwards" business as usual.

Actually I've pulled back a little on this.....I was testing the waters to find out how certain people would behave. Been an interesting experiment.

I had a discussion with someone with good contacts to the inner sanctum. I know what I'm about to say isn't some great revelation Reefton but it is worth pondering. The plan is "draft" so it isn't a fait accompli that x and y racecourse will go and z will stay. What is a given is that there will be a push for rationalisation. Now I think it we all agree that there should be some form of rationalisation at some level. So NZTR is hoping that clubs on a regional basis can get together and formulate a plan for their area. Now anyone who is a West Coaster knows that Kumara is a hopeless case when compared to the other courses and for a number of strong reasons shouldn't stay. NZTR is greatly concerned about workplace safety and whether rightly or wrongly believes that most if not all of our courses need capital expenditure to reach a satisfactory legal requirement. That is the the biggest pressure and they consider that there must be some capital expenditure efficiencies through centralisation. So Reefton - is it possible to talk to the other clubs and formulate a regional plan?

You're kidding me? Westport?!

No there were other replies. Hesi is free to do whatever he wants to. Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe that I have contributed to the toxicity. Certainly I've only PM'd one person and been PM'd by two others. I've seen this all happen before on RC and I guess that given BOAY arose out of dissent then it is susceptible to its own. Live by the sword die by the sword. At the end of the day I'm not too worried - don't sweat the small stuff - there is some good stuff coming and I'm focussing on that. Cheers.

Yes I'm aware of the issue. Someone forwarded one to me. Can't say the content impressed me but I'm looking into it.

Some posters have been drawing comparisons between the concept of Free Speech on BOAY and other Forums. I'd like to point out the following differences: Freda posted on her knowledge of the use of cattle prods in horse training. She was publicly abused for making those comments. Note she didn't name anyone and the information wasn't hearsay that is she had seen it first hand; Another poster made the comment "I was asked by a trainer to use one once when riding their horse." That person didn't name names and spoke from experience. The response from the moderator was - "Prove it or retract it." That is ridiculous. So there are two examples of the differences in how forums are moderated.

I'd like to make it public that I placed HESI in the Post Approval Queue for the last few days. This is where the member is free to post however their post must be approved by the moderator before being seen public. As far as I'm aware this only affected one post. I do NOT see this as being hypocritical in terms of the principles of BOAY or for that matter being "disloyal." Loyalty seems to be a concept being loosely thrown around at the moment! I did it because I found Hesi was being openly destructive towards BOAY and I personally did not have the time to challenge those comments either on their validity or accuracy. I will also add that Thomass graciously accepted to have a complete holiday for last week.

Easy....just joking! I hear what you are saying however bear in mind that it is BOAY that has to manage the complaint process when events like this happen. Such is the price of running a forum no the edge.

LOL took less than ten minutes to get threats of legal action!!!!

Just be aware BOAY Greyhound folk a complaint has been made to the RIU regarding certain posts. Those concerned will have their privacy respected as per the policy of BOAY.

View the full article

On the dirty behind the scenes machinations and dealings of racing social media.

What Scooby was buying horses? I wonder with whose money.