mardigras

I am yet to fully price up the FF, but at this stage price wise, I think Ventura Storm looks decent value. I like Best Solution also.

As expected. #14 gets the win!

These 5 were unlucky yesterday FLAUNT IT GIRL ($6.90) GLENDALOUGH ($3.00) THE BOY WONDER ($4.70) DONIZETTI ($8.80) IAGO ($4.30) but I'm expecting bigger things from these two black type beauties today. R3 #14 WHAT A SMASHER R5 #10 GOT THE CALL

Good luck Weasel. Sadly, I could only come up with 5 black type specials today. It's probably best if you don't ask who they were, but suffice to say they didn't win.

The industry relies on losers. Winners aren't much use - especially those betting on NZ TAB. So luckily NZ TAB has Mr Fraud.

Meant to add - that's because the 'plan' forever evolves. If you followed all aspects of the plan, you end up with most runners giving plenty to choose from on Sunday for the brunch write up.

Can't do the trial part. But it makes no difference. I'd expect that nearly every winner can be written about as to why it was a selection. After the race of course. I could write about a 100-1 winner easily as to what made it a 15-1 chance and great value. Let's not forget, back in racechat days, he claimed similar stuff. When asked to produce something, over the course of 9 months he gave out selections ranging in price from $3 - $5. 8 of them. Not a single winner. Nine months of nothing and one day he shows some wins. And now we have the same scenario from Mr Fraud. He'll one day possibly show some wins and claim he is a punter of success. But the facts are obvious. The blue print is flawed and he is a fraud. He'd make an interesting case for a psychologist and also a brain specialist wanting to work out what makes some brains so dysfunctional.

I don't need your accounts. You're a fraud. Why do you write so many fairytales? Does no one like you and you want to feel appreciated? Get help.

Now Mr Fraud, you won't mind me calling you that since we know you are. I stated the trainer knows more about training horses than I do. I never said the trainer was always right. And clearly they aren't. Your statement is so stupid. If a trainer (who knows what a horse requires for maximum performance), is putting blinkers on (or any other gear change for that matter), then answer these simple questions. 1) Why doesn't every horse improve from what it has done prior, when racing with the gear change? 1a) Further to 1), why do more horses perform worse following gear changes, than perform better? 2) Why does a trainer make a gear change and then the next week after a poor performance, make another gear change, and then next week after another poor performance, make another gear change. Each week, you are stating he knows what a horse requires for maximum performance. Yet something hasn't been working. 3) Why does a trainer make a gear change where the horse performs terribly, then takes the gear change off and never applies that change again? Looking forward to your answers Mr Fraud.

He certainly does in respect of training racehorses. I've never said otherwise. I'm not a horse trainer so that is to be expected. I'm a punter.

I certainly can guarantee I know better than you. Don't stop what you're doing. I think self deprecation and humiliation is fine. You do it well. Every post of yours confirms your mental capability (lack thereof). Thanks.

I'd be confident my education easily stacks up against yours. You only have to read your posts to know that. I doubt you managed to slip through. They just forgot about you as you can't expect people to try and teach you forever. You're mentally deficient.

It's highly unlikely that I will make stupid f in comments. But your own comment hasn't stopped you all these years. You are the master if stupid.

This from a guy that doesn't actually profit from punting. Go back to work loser. And top up your account.

As I said, I didn't write what you quoted. If you're going to quote me, quote me. Don't make up what you think I wrote as if I wrote it. Simple, just for you. And stop writing fairytales. I've never stated Snowden is wrong. I've stated our opinions differ. His might be right, mine might be right. We both might be wrong.

I've never written that.

Barryb, the value component is some made up number. It's the higher the price, the higher the value, not regarding whether the price is value. $2.00 is just less value than $5.00. Even if the horse should be at $10. And he keeps backing them forever if in rating class because of the superior in black type back to rating class blue print.

Does it cover more distance racing without cover for a certain distance that it does racing with cover for a certain distance? Interesting. I can see why you struggle with mathematics.

Don't blame me for the fact your blue print is a load of bollocks. I can only follow what it states. I can work it out. I don't find it useful. Certainly not for assessing performance. If others can, that's up to them. I'm not telling anyone to ignore extra distance. I am simply stating I ignore it. I haven't agreed there are no mathematical ways that help. I've said there are no generic stats that help. I use time a fair bit. Time has a mathematical component to it.

Rocky Tryax, March Legend, Copper Belt a few of my favs.

That's true. According to Thomass, there are runners in every race that can't win. If he told us a few of those before the race, then we have options. They'd be the ones to back to win.

I did that. 52 runners and sfa. All superior black type back to inferior class blue print. What next? The only thing resonating is the sound your minute brain is making banging against the walls of your skull.

I think you are spot on. The reality is, he will never answer your questions directly. Because he needs to be able to change things based on how the results pan out. He would reduce the level of fairytales if he says one thing on here - and then alters it for his Sunday winners.

He's already answered it I think barry. We've been doing this all wrong. I followed the blue print for the last week. Came up with 52 selections in superior form running in black type now running in a rating race. You could do the same as well. Managed to score myself a beauty 6 winners. Divs totalling $44.4. What more could one ask for. That's as good as a dart. The idea isn't to win. It is to have fun betting on most races and getting the odd under priced winner on the basis you don't have to have a clue - just like Thomass.

That is impressive analysis - something I would expect from such a scholar. I hadn't managed to achieve such results. And now I know why. Thankyou.