mardigras

He probably does, although as is his way, his understanding of Swahili is likely to be very limited as well.

Still having trouble with English I see. Because again, that is not what is stated. Idiot. Not another discussion where your stupidity and obsession end up with you repeating the same crap over and over because you are too stupid to understand simple things. You're obsessed and you are stupid. A bad combination.

No, I left. It's called making a stand. Can you read? I'll help you since remedial classes aren't working. ".and refused to post ever again over there." "Sure did." "So when I left, it was no longer a sulk. It was a stand". Quite simple, yet still a struggle for you.

In your own small mind you did. But as what others have also stated. You simply make stuff up to suit what happens. You're a dreamer and a loser. And now you're going on abut a runner that placed. Along with a bunch of $2, $3 selections of which one won. Well done on that by the way.

Sure did. Since I work on the premise of honesty. And he doesn't. In fact, he's a lot like you. Makes stuff up because the truth doesn't sit well. So when I left, it was no longer a sulk. It was a stand. But you sulk off and then after a while, you come back. That's what a sulk does.

Just looked him up. He seems to have run 4 times at Levin. Won it in 75 and 76 beating Copper Belt and Black Rod in '76 and Black Rod featured in '75 as well. He was a good one.

Went to school in Levin. Often went to the Levin track. I think Grey Way may have won the Levin Cup/Stakes. Maybe in a race with Copper Belt. Memory not what it was. The ill-fated Altitude won the inaugural Bayer Classic.

Nope. Levin was still going for the start of the Bayer classic era.

You're right. We shouldn't be so hard on you even if you are now trying to compare longer priced runners with a bunch of favs. To be fair, if a dart had been used and had hit horses paying the same prices as your 8 runners, they would have 'generally' expected to have got 1.8 winners which we know isn't possible. So one winner is on the low side and two winners would have put you fractionally ahead of a dart. Did you use a dart?

You can't even get that right. it was a H9. And they ran 1.12 - and on a track where Pierata ran 1.10.8 the race before.

To change its behaviour? Are you saying he allowed his horse to run knowing it couldn't handle the conditions - at $600k a pop? My numbskull bot which I don't have, but my analysis seemed to not need to know what happened to Redzel since I priced it well clear of the rest - in this race! Wrong again. I certainly don't do that. And I've never written that I would. You just make crap up as always. Face it, you're so far out of your depth. Blinkers on is for morons. You can't generalise like that. Yet all of your blue print bull is based on generalisations. Idiot.

Amazingly stupid comment. Redzel has only ever raced without blinkers once, 2 and a half years ago. Ran 2nd, the start before running 2nd with blinkers back on. How did he go? Did the trick work? Has the horse ever performed so bad? Do blinkers on make them race worse than ever before? You'll blame the track conditions. But doesn't Hayes know what he would be like on a track like that. He wouldn't have started if he knew he was no good. And has won twice in Soft ground. Remember - you just trust the trainer and add 20%. I know you love my price images.

Sadly Hamada was euthanised this morning.

Now is usually around the time we hear of the unfortunate situations. Godolphin have had the misfortune to have Hamada injured in trackwork this morning. And with Appleby's Emotionless also injured earlier, things haven't gone well so far for the yard. Hope Hamada is all OK.

To be fair, the final field odds would be largely driven by the punters. So they likely were taking the odds even if the bookies are spineless with respect to risk. With futures, I don't expect many punters are taking futures from a TAB - or if they are, they probably deserve what they get. Their risk aversion makes the majority of their prices largely the equivalent of robbing the blind.

On Aus races, they pretty much just copy Tabcorp. Which also has her at $5, as does Tatts. They are running market percentages well over 100% on less than a normal final field size. Spineless is right.

I doubt it. He has a history of sulking. He goes away after he gets a hiding. And it is the weekend tomorrow. That's doll patch repair time.

I'd be disagreeing with that. How do you then lay culpability? All riders would have to be fined. The rules should be sufficient regarding excessive slowing of pace causing horses to race up on heels, clip etc. How can you fine a jockey for riding a horse slow if the other jockeys do nothing about it. If they do it safely, that's their right.

That's how it works FTF. No one is backing the losers - surely? I mean, the last 8 races from Thomass (pre race) from his top selection, have resulted in 1 winner paying $2.30. The others don't get bet on and were never intended to be (even when paying less that that). That's the masterclass bit, don't back the ones that don't win - pure masterclass.

Yep. But that applies to every horse that doesn't win, even if the hot fav or even if beaten by a nose. I don't think I picked it however.

Is to me. I have it priced at $32.

Williams has bought 50% of COM, and 100% of Yucatan, also set to race this weekend.

Well his record with doing that 'trick' in the big races is poor. Unless he's only done it once which contradicts what you wrote.

As I said, give up. I don't need to know about blinkers for ANY type of behavioural issue. The trainer should present the horse in the way he believes it will run to its best. Simple.

Give up. It is ALL behavioural. Your next point is irrelevant because they are still aspects of behaviour you twit. I haven't described the types of behaviour they want to address when I said they are to address a behavioural issue.