As a result of the Becs podcast - and a few other matters brought to my attention recently- I made some enquiries with some re-homers of horses. Gallopers, not the harnessed variety.
Seems that some owners and/or trainers had the delightful habit of sending broken-down or temperamentally unsuitable horses to these people and expecting them to deal with the problems.
You'd be horrified if you knew some of the names but we won't go there.
That has brought about a necessary shake-up of procedure. Every horse placed at a rehoming facility has a complete vet overhaul, paid for by NZTR. Those deemed unsuitable for pleasure riding for ANY reason gets returned to the owner or trainer.
NZTR has no problem with horses being euthanised, contrary to what may be thought. However, they expect owners/ trainers to take that responsibility.
My beef is that the Welfare arm of NZTR doesn't get off its backside and front foot the concerns of the public. The greyhound folk now spend thousands in operations and general rehab to ensure as many dogs as possible are able to be passed on as pets. But they allowed the few arseholes who gave the industry such a bad name to carry on with impunity. And the rehabbing work was never made public knowledge. What happened to them is an unfortunate result of sitting on their hands for too long.
You may dismiss Bec's stance as that of a nutter, that's your choice.
But if a nice publicity video/ podcast about the welfare requirements was made available on mainstream TV, it may go a long way to shutting up the vocal naysayers.