mardigras Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 4 minutes ago, Thomass said: The NH handicappers know 1/2kg=1L over 2000m-2400M how many WFA races run in the NH will reducing the 3yo allowance by 1L result in statsman? Do they. Well what they think they know is wrong. Paragraph 2 - who knows. But they would have to make the 3yos carry more weight than the 5yos to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 4 minutes ago, mardigras said: I love it when you confirm your stupidity. Try some more English remedial classes, the ones you've been taking are not working. There is no 'given' relationship between many and a percentage. You humiliate yourself better than anyone else can. Fool...you said 3% is "many" Of course there's a correlation...3% of NH races is not "many" in relation to the rest of the races run How stupid are you? Clearly your mammy home schooled you...but forgot to issue detention when you got things wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 1 minute ago, Thomass said: Fool...you said 3% is "many" Of course there's a correlation...3% of NH races is not "many" in relation to the rest of the races run How stupid are you? Clearly your mammy home schooled you...but forgot to issue detention when you got things wrong 3% of the races IS many races. Are you stupid. I can't believe you actually are repeating how stupid you are. I didn't say many compared to the total number. I said many. Go and look the word up. You're retarded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, mardigras said: What's not? 0.5kg? Yes it is. A further reason 0.5kg is not 0.5L is because 40% of the races run would be changed by a simple claimer being used claiming 1lb. They're working off 1/2kg=1L ffs Up to 2400M... You can't claim in WFA racing...who knew? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 1 minute ago, Thomass said: They're working off 1/2kg=1L ffs Up to 2400M... You can't claim in WFA racing...who knew? More fool them if that is the case. They are going to be disappointed with the outcomes from the change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, Thomass said: You can't claim in WFA racing...who knew? No, but in all the handicap races, just 1lb between winning and losing 40% of the time. Hahahaha. According to you. In NZ, all those horses that race on the minimum but above their rated weight, they'd be winning everything if weighted properly. According to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Hey Thomass, how would those NH handicappers do at punting if they were allowed to punt. About as well as you. That's why they are handicappers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 17 minutes ago, mardigras said: 3% of the races IS many races. Are you stupid. I can't believe you actually are repeating how stupid you are. I didn't say many compared to the total number. I said many. Go and look the word up. You're retarded. You said "many" races... ...then in a later thread you said 3% And still tried to tell us it was "many" When clearly it's not in relation to the number run ffs This is basic English Its like saying "I've got many $" Then realising you've only got 3...out of a Hundred f me...go back to school Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 (edited) It doesn't have to be in relation to the number run. Common sense says that there are a large number of races run in the UK, 3% is equally going to translate to many as a number. It's quite simple but your wasting everyone who reads this, time, due to your inadequacies. Yes it is basic English. And you still are not grasping it. Since many races are won by 0.05L or less, and 3% of the races run equates to many races. I'm not your damn teacher and clearly you haven't been capable when your teacher tried to help you. Edited November 15, 2018 by mardigras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 If your Manny told Einstein that her wee mard had "many" brain cells... ...then Einstein asked you about Pi...and you said " no mathematical equation like that exists" Hed know you're operating at 3%...or less Iron Stain you is Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 37 minutes ago, Thomass said: If your Manny told Einstein that her wee mard had "many" brain cells... ...then Einstein asked you about Pi...and you said " no mathematical equation like that exists" Hed know you're operating at 3%...or less Iron Stain you is Stupid strikes again. If I said I had many grains of rice in a bowl. You'd say that I didn't. Because you're stupid. You are the site clown. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Yep if you had 3000 in a bowl that'd be many If you had 3000 red faced grains in a bowl of 100,000 thatd be 3%....sfa red bare faced spanked grains... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Thomass said: Yep if you had 3000 in a bowl that'd be many If you had 3000 red faced grains in a bowl of 100,000 thatd be 3%....sfa red bare faced spanked grains... Stupid strikes again. Many doesn't stipulate 'out of'. It stipulates a large number. Give it up. You're an embarrassment. The more you write, the more people will question whether you actually even attempted to get educated. Try and reference a dictionary before embarrassing yourself further. Edited November 15, 2018 by mardigras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 13 minutes ago, mardigras said: Stupid strikes again. Many doesn't stipulate 'out of'. It stipulates a large number. Give it up. You're an embarrassment. The more you write, the more people will question whether you actually even attempted to get educated. Try and reference a dictionary before embarrassing yourself further. Even Sanskrit speakers have this covered A Camel grazing in the Desert...gets promised "many" dates.... The Arab whipping boy called Mardi...then goes robbing other Hareems and brings back 100... ...and offers the hungry Camel.. infested with a thousand fleas... 3%...or 3 if he didn't take Math ...the Camel then proceeds to distribute 97% of his Fleas to the whippin boys Ass.. ...That's "many".... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Stupid strikes again. Keep them coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 The newly crowned Sheik Thomass bin Hucktoom gets promised "many" Princesses from the local Hareem... The whipping boy Grassi McGrassiface brings back 3 measly flea bitten specimens in need of a good meal and a good...sleep Sheike Thomass proceeds to beat Grassi's ass 97 times to teach the wee f'er a lesson in Math and for getting the Sheike as excited as hell.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FeelTheFear Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 are there no staff available? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Hello, the Sheike got excited beatin his ass...staff should never get any contras.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theshu Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Sounds like you have been beating something else,tosser. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 15 minutes ago, theshu said: Sounds like you have been beating something else,tosser. Trolling is a terrible trait shrew...go do something useful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 16 hours ago, Thomass said: The NH handicappers know 1/2kg=1L over 2000m-2400M But on our Heavy 11 tracks an app allowance by a good 3kg claimer is massive Especially all of the mud over a neddy's legs and in big hooves...as per the research Send an email to all these expert handicappers telling them they all have it wrong. The WFA scale does not change for wet tracks. The ratings based handicapping system does not change for wet tracks. And does not change for different distances. The apprentice allowances offered do not change for wet tracks. And do not change for different distances. You know more them them so you claim. How arrogant. Still waiting for the links to ANY actual studies. Nothing? Thought so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 (edited) 15 hours ago, Thomass said: Yep if you had 3000 in a bowl that'd be many If you had 3000 red faced grains in a bowl of 100,000 thatd be 3%....sfa red bare faced spanked grains... If I had around 3000 grains of rice in a bowl. I have many grains of rice. If I had around 3000 grains of rice in a bowl that had around 100,000 grains of rice in it, I still have many grains of rice. Your English is appalling. Seek help. I have come across many stupid people, but you would be the most stupid I've ever observed. You have zero ability to learn. Even though I've come across many stupid people, I've only come across likely less than 0.001% of the people. ADJECTIVE, PRONOUN, & DETERMINER A large number of. as determiner ‘many people agreed with her’ as pronoun ‘the solution to many of our problems’ ‘many think bungee jumping is a new craze’ as adjective ‘one of my many errors’ Edited November 15, 2018 by mardigras Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 (edited) Haha...is it arborio?? Because boring is your tour de rice ffs That impact of 0.05L will change many races That's what you wrote... Any Chinese rice eating English as a second Lingo Student knows "many" has to be in relation to the rest of the number at hand... Even a bungee jumping Chinese tourist knows that 3/100 is certainly not "many" crazies... If the solution to "many" of the Earths problems was 3% worth... Even a Chinese scientist would know were f'ed But look on the Brightside Mcduff If you were told 97% of our problems had been solved...and 3% hadn't...you'd say Yep, "many of our problems had been solved" Let it go Elsa... you're in Fantasyland... Edited November 15, 2018 by Thomass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mardigras Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Why would I let it go when every time you respond, you prove how stupid you are. I even gave you the definition of many. And you couldn't even understand it. 'many' is a simple word, yet you have managed to go your entire life without knowing what it means. Which is a classic. Come back and tell us again that many means in relation to the total. Can't wait. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomass Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Even your usual sycophants have deserted you...can't you see Magoo? But one needs to ask... why have you come across so many stupid people...do you surround yourself with them? ...or due to your narcissistic PD...you think you have many around you... 70% plus... ...if it was 3%...I'd be thinking you're stupid Bazza and curious would be in that percentile for sure... Perhaps you've got them locked up...and they'll be along soon to support your 'many' wacko theory ..after you torture them with the oldy but goody...thumbnail screws...ouch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.