Murray Fish Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murray Fish Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago some interesting comments on prize money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curious Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Thanks for posting that. Makes me sad in a way that we don't have anything here resembling that kind of journalism and interviewing skill, let alone the informed opinion and insight of the interviewee. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murray Fish Posted 21 hours ago Author Share Posted 21 hours ago 19 minutes ago, curious said: Makes me sad in a way that we don't have anything here resembling that kind of journalism and interviewing skill, let alone the informed opinion and insight of the interviewee. lol! we do have a lot of naïve enthusiasm though! sigh! and plenty of sycophantic brown nosing as well! wow behold any '' realpolitik! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freda Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago 11 hours ago, Murray Fish said: lol! we do have a lot of naïve enthusiasm though! sigh! and plenty of sycophantic brown nosing as well! wow behold any '' realpolitik! Yeah, sadly nothing approaching the above podcast. What insightful comment, thanks from me too for putting that up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tragedy Beat Posted 7 hours ago Share Posted 7 hours ago An outstanding interview (take note Trackside!). Could listen to Freedman for hours. Glad he brought up that they had a heap in their stable in their prime, but he is right - the big trainers are too big. And its wrong because no one can give 500 plus horses the correct attention. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huey Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Same situation occurs here but obviously on a smaller scale. Strike rate trainers with huge teams(owners and the public misinterpreting the correlation between training, culling and winning) , expensive yearlings winning 1 or 2 races , money floating upwards with a few scraps thrown to the bottom (of which the big guys go and get anyway) . Fan boys thinking this is good for the sport. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, Tragedy Beat said: And its wrong because no one can give 500 plus horses the correct attention. But they don't have ONE person giving the attention. Waller for example has a number of foreman and assistants below him. Just to wind @Huey up although Te Akau don't have 400 horses probably closer to 150 in work at any one time they have a very talented crew assisting Mark Walker and Sam Bergerson. Hunter Durant in CHCH. Ben Gleeson in Melbourne. Sam, Hunter and Ben would make excellent trainers in their own right. Nicole Shailer at Matamata knows her stuff too. So like any successful large organisation big trainers have devolved some day to day decision making down the chain. Of course don't forget that these stables employ a lot of people. Some stables have higher attrition rates than others however at the end of the day all stables have an attrition rate. I don't think you can argue that smaller stables necessarily give more attention to their horses on the flip side the smaller stable is more likely to persevere with a plodder longer than they should. Come in @Huey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.