Thomass Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago So we all know the economy has tanked under this atrocious Knat Gumment, thanks for nothing Nichola, don't come back But seriously, what did the connections of ORCHESTORAL do to convince HQ to run 3 horses against her? Couldn't Craig Baker get off his chuff and talk a few R 75's into running as well and stump up the cost to run for free plus a few bangers chucked in?? Anything other than a 4 horse PATHETIC field A pony scurry would've been far more entertaining...even a side saddle contest with Victorian era ladies, corsets attached for authenticity?? Just give Wodger the money now and avoid any more embarrassment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huey Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Why is she not getting hammered at the weights also, plenty of winter horses carry more than 60kg when gap in handicap is that large. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curious Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 26 minutes ago, Huey said: Why is she not getting hammered at the weights also, plenty of winter horses carry more than 60kg when gap in handicap is that large. It's the handicapping system. She's rated 102 so she gets 62 less the 2kg female allowance. Shamus rated 98 gets 2kgs less, but not the allowance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doomed Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago The big thing is precedent. Makes it very hard to scrap a race with four entrants anywhere else now. I also think it makes it hard to justify refusing to split a race in the south when you get 22 noms at a track that starts 14. The usual approach is to tell the 8 unlucky ones to piss off and wait another couple of weeks. Not a single horse balloted or eliminated at Ellerslie or Trentham. It will be interesting to see what happens at the next few southern meetings when they get over 20 odd noms for a race. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huey Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, Doomed said: The big thing is precedent. Makes it very hard to scrap a race with four entrants anywhere else now. I also think it makes it hard to justify refusing to split a race in the south when you get 22 noms at a track that starts 14. The usual approach is to tell the 8 unlucky ones to piss off and wait another couple of weeks. Not a single horse balloted or eliminated at Ellerslie or Trentham. It will be interesting to see what happens at the next few southern meetings when they get over 20 odd noms for a race. It really doesn't for them. They ll do it again. They don't care. CS doesn't think the racing mafia exist in NZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.