Disappearing threads elsewhere ...???

[curious]

I see this disappeared over there at the name calling place when it was revealed that it had been pinched from here.

 

[SLB2.0]

What Bitofayarn has achieved is exposing the lies and slander of RC's owner

Anything negative about him or his friend - or even just an image posted on this site - gets taken down.

What Leigh used to do was allow himself and LM to make posts under users' names without their knowledge. However, since the inception of this site, he can no longer get away with it without repercussion. So now what does he do instead? He just deletes anything and anyone who makes him look bad (which isn't hard).

He should be allowed to own and operate a website after what he did, and what he allowed someone to do, but here we are.... years later, and he's still insecure about being called wrong on something.

For someone who carries on about BoaY posting something after RC does - it's very hypocritical of him to delete an image first posted on this site. Leigh - we don't have time for hypocrites - just stop being one, and your life will be more joyous.

Edited 19 hours ago by SLB2.0

[Chief Stipe]

1 hour ago, SLB2.0 said:

For someone who carries on about BoaY posting something after RC does - it's very hypocritical of him to delete an image first posted on this site. Leigh - we don't have time for hypocrites - just stop being one, and your life will be more joyous.

As if there aren't other sources of racing news!

[Pete Lane]

2 hours ago, SLB2.0 said:

What Bitofayarn has achieved is exposing the lies and slander of RC's owner

Anything negative about him or his friend - or even just an image posted on this site - gets taken down.

What Leigh used to do was allow himself and LM to make posts under users' names without their knowledge. However, since the inception of this site, he can no longer get away with it without repercussion. So now what does he do instead? He just deletes anything and anyone who makes him look bad (which isn't hard).

He should be allowed to own and operate a website after what he did, and what he allowed someone to do, but here we are.... years later, and he's still insecure about being called wrong on something.

For someone who carries on about BoaY posting something after RC does - it's very hypocritical of him to delete an image first posted on this site. Leigh - we don't have time for hypocrites - just stop being one, and your life will be more joyous.

I've never done it on my site but I can confirm that it is an inbuilt feature of Invision websites that an admin can post under another user's profile. It's transparent to anyone else.

Personally I think it's a bad feature but I'm unsure how the inception  of this site has anything to do with someone being able to 'get away with it without repercussion'. 

[SLB2.0]

39 minutes ago, Pete Lane said:

I've never done it on my site but I can confirm that it is an inbuilt feature of Invision websites that an admin can post under another user's profile. It's transparent to anyone else.

Personally I think it's a bad feature but I'm unsure how the inception  of this site has anything to do with someone being able to 'get away with it without repercussion'. 

Afternoon, Pete.

When Leo Molly posted using my username (with the help of Leigh), it was under the pretense that I was making the post, especially for someone, who at the time, was working in the NZ horse racing media. Forums like BoaY allowed me to call this out because I was banned from using RC - therein, this site is vital for banned members to be able to call out the shocking behaviour on RC.

Now... imagine if I was allowed to make a post under your alias on BoaY, pretending to be you. Would you be happy with this? You wouldn't think that's a shocking thing to do? While Leigh isn't as bad as Molly, he allowed it to happen, and deleted all posts I tried to make to rebuke the lies posted under MY name, under MY account, by Leo.

 

Edited 15 hours ago by SLB2.0

[Chief Stipe]

@SLB2.0 there were worse cases than yours.  Higher profile as well that involved a lot of money changing hands in the end.  Two owners of the other site at the time - one several leagues more intelligent that the other.  

[SLB2.0]

I have no doubt - and they could have come up with much more inventive lies than the ones they told about me 😄

I also had a $500 bet with Morton, which I lost, and Leo tried to post under his name/number and try to swindle me into paying another $500, despite my post clear as day saying $500.

Strange times, especially for people of their age. LM has been gunning for me since I was 15.... can you believe that? Picking fights with a kid. Jealously rears its ugly head, and time has done him, nor his waistband, any favours.

[Murray Fish]

47 minutes ago, SLB2.0 said:

has been gunning for me since I was 15.... can you believe that?

yip!  I have be following it for quite a few years! really a Badge of Honor!

[Pete Lane]

4 hours ago, SLB2.0 said:

Afternoon, Pete.

When Leo Molly posted using my username (with the help of Leigh), it was under the pretense that I was making the post, especially for someone, who at the time, was working in the NZ horse racing media. Forums like BoaY allowed me to call this out because I was banned from using RC - therein, this site is vital for banned members to be able to call out the shocking behaviour on RC.

Now... imagine if I was allowed to make a post under your alias on BoaY, pretending to be you. Would you be happy with this? You wouldn't think that's a shocking thing to do? While Leigh isn't as bad as Molly, he allowed it to happen, and deleted all posts I tried to make to rebuke the lies posted under MY name, under MY account, by Leo.

 

I actually agree with you. It's a weird thing that this software allows you to do this but it actually does. I've always struggled to work out why exactly the developers thought it was a good idea to allow this because, as you've rightfully pointed out, it is just open to abuse.

[Chief Stipe]

6 minutes ago, Pete Lane said:

I actually agree with you. It's a weird thing that this software allows you to do this but it actually does. I've always struggled to work out why exactly the developers thought it was a good idea to allow this because, as you've rightfully pointed out, it is just open to abuse.

When did you first have access to the back end of "this software"?

[Murray Fish]

52 minutes ago, Pete Lane said:

I've always struggled to work out why exactly the developers thought it was a good idea to allow this

Perhaps down to the coders back with the early Billiton boards  were also involved in the early games, which all had cheats built in! Always 'backdoors' if you knew where to look!    What happened else where really did poison a site where a lot of people had participated mostly principally, in a share interest in racing! The pace of this place suits me!