Spatchcock Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago On 13/07/2025 at 1:51 PM, Newmarket said: Wow, how bad can it get? This winter has seen the worst of jumping, today at Woodville the same. I’ve always like the jumpers, but on what I have seen recently, it’s only time before they ban it. What are you even on about? Quote
Newmarket Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Spatchcock said: What are you even on about? Horses falling…. poor riding, poor tracks…. you blind or what? 1 Quote
Spatchcock Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago Horses have fallen in jumps races forever and a day. It's statistically the safest it's ever been. "Poor tracks" - it's winter and zero meetings have been cancelled. Am I blind? I just watched six great races at Te Aroha. 1 Quote
Newmarket Posted 16 hours ago Author Posted 16 hours ago 5 hours ago, Spatchcock said: Horses have fallen in jumps races forever and a day. It's statistically the safest it's ever been. "Poor tracks" - it's winter and zero meetings have been cancelled. Am I blind? I just watched six great races at Te Aroha. Things have changed …. Races beamed all over the world so really public wouldn’t know how many nags injured or died 30 yrs ago….. but everything under the microscope. Also didn’t have the protesters or greenies years ago…..times a changing. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 59 minutes ago, Newmarket said: Things have changed …. Races beamed all over the world so really public wouldn’t know how many nags injured or died 30 yrs ago….. but everything under the microscope. Also didn’t have the protesters or greenies years ago…..times a changing. "Times a changing" for what? Quote
The Centaur Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago New Zealand can in no way match the protocols involved in UK jumping. If you can't do it properly then don't do it. Seeing an exhausted horse falling at the last jump probably injuring the jockey is madness to allow it to happen. Basically there is no public interest in jumping. Its more an extra option for some owners to recoup outlays. By all means create extra opportunities for flat racing but from an economical and business viewpoint jumping tote racing makes no sense. 1 Quote
Freda Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 9 hours ago, The Centaur said: New Zealand can in no way match the protocols involved in UK jumping. If you can't do it properly then don't do it. Seeing an exhausted horse falling at the last jump probably injuring the jockey is madness to allow it to happen. Basically there is no public interest in jumping. Its more an extra option for some owners to recoup outlays. By all means create extra opportunities for flat racing but from an economical and business viewpoint jumping tote racing makes no sense. I agree that UK jumping makes our efforts look amateurish and, although I've had a jumper or two, and love the jumpers, we can't do it like the Brits. 1 Quote
Newmarket Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 12 hours ago, Chief Stipe said: "Times a changing" for what? Read what I posted….was a time if you were not oncourse watching races…. nobody would know if a horse fell. And no protestors back then Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 11 hours ago, The Centaur said: Seeing an exhausted horse falling at the last jump probably injuring the jockey is madness to allow it to happen. Why did the Jockey jump? Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Newmarket said: Read what I posted….was a time if you were not oncourse watching races…. nobody would know if a horse fell. And no protestors back then Oh we now have televisions and that makes all the difference. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Newmarket said: no protestors back then Go join the miserable sods and stop watching. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 30 minutes ago, Newmarket said: Read what I posted….was a time if you were not oncourse watching races…. nobody would know if a horse fell. And no protestors back then So you suddenly have these pangs of conscience because others can see it happen on TV. Hypocrisy at its worst. Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 14 hours ago, Newmarket said: Things have changed …. Races beamed all over the world so really public wouldn’t know how many nags injured or died 30 yrs ago….. but everything under the microscope. Also didn’t have the protesters or greenies years ago…..times a changing. 750 million in 228 countries watched the Melbourne Cup on TV. That's enough interest to run a solid business. Quote
Newmarket Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: 750 million in 228 countries watched the Melbourne Cup on TV. That's enough interest to run a solid business. Good that you mention the Melbourne Cup. Pretty sure 7 or 8 horses have died in the past decade while racing in the Cup? Not a good look is it, very few died previous years, so what’s the cause? Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Newmarket said: Good that you mention the Melbourne Cup. Pretty sure 7 or 8 horses have died in the past decade while racing in the Cup? Not a good look is it, very few died previous years, so what’s the cause? I suggest you turn the TV off. If you use your previous argument the reason is the old "does a bear shit in the woods" or "did the tree make a noise when it fell". That is if you didn't see it it didn't happen. A very very small number of horses incur fatal injuries in racing. That's a fact since the time racing began. That fact can't be changed. There are a small percentage of horses in any stable that injure themselves without a saddle or a Jockey on their back. That's the nature of bloodstock. If you don't like it choose another sport. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.