curious Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Jan-26 Date Club Stakes Combined T/O per $ Ranking Oncourse O/Course T/O Ranking Turnover of stakes Turnover per $ of Stakes 16/01/2026 Waikato TR 146520 1676200 11.44 2 50300 0.34 11 10/01/2026 Kumara 236625 2516800 10.64 3 342200 1.45 2 9/01/2026 Otaki 146520 1447600 9.88 4 61800 0.42 9 2/01/2026 Wairarapa 142450 1382800 9.71 5 336800 2.36 1 1/01/2026 Riverton 200875 1931200 9.61 6 106800 0.53 7 6/01/2026 Ruakaka 163390 1473700 9.02 7 180700 1.11 4 18/01/2026 Auckland TRI(Puke) 195625 1709000 8.74 8 26200 0.13 23 4/01/2026 Greymouth 172935 1464600 8.47 9 133300 0.77 5 7/01/2026 Reefton 175350 1270600 7.25 10 132400 0.76 6 14/01/2026 Canterbury Racing 199250 1434200 7.20 11 42200 0.21 17 19/01/2026 Whanganui 163170 1117100 6.85 12 49800 0.31 12 3/01/2026 Thames(Te Aroha) 147745 1006300 6.81 13 73600 0.50 8 10/01/2026 Wanganui JC 308250 2020600 6.56 14 54100 0.18 20 24/01/2026 Canterbury 448200 2813500 6.28 15 88200 0.20 18 8/01/2026 Tauranga 289975 1746600 6.02 16 59200 0.20 18 22/01/2026 Southland 150785 897900 5.95 17 19800 0.13 23 17/01/2026 Waikouaiti RC 366325 2135200 5.83 18 87400 0.24 15 11/01/2026 Auckland TRI 452575 2488100 5.50 19 100500 0.22 16 23/01/2026 Matamata 191875 830300 4.33 20 12300 0.06 25 24/01/2026 Taranaki 405325 1633100 4.03 21 108200 0.27 14 1/01/2026 Auckland TRI 1491275 5859400 3.93 22 454200 0.30 13 17/01/2026 Wellington RC 1233500 4182800 3.39 23 171100 0.14 22 3/01/2026 Wellington RC 1512575 4728500 3.13 24 231300 0.15 21 24/01/2026 Auckland TRI 4442500 6827900 1.54 25 1545100 0.35 10 1 Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago So you are suggesting that there should be more races at Kumara? Quote
curious Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 19 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: So you are suggesting that there should be more races at Kumara? No. I wan't suggesting anything. If I were to in light of those figures, it might be that NZTR should pay stakes in more direct proportion to turnover, not keep throwing more and more money at the least sustainable meetings but I've been saying that for the last 20 years. Edited 1 hour ago by curious Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago 24 minutes ago, curious said: No. I wan't suggesting anything. If I were to in light of those figures, it might be that NZTR should pay stakes in more direct proportion to turnover, not keep throwing more and more money at the least sustainable meetings but I've been saying that for the last 20 years. But that won't work. The reason is you are not considering the other sources of revenue at that time. You would make a brilliant Cost Accountant. Hint: Yield. Quote
Murray Fish Posted 30 minutes ago Posted 30 minutes ago 1 hour ago, curious said: 7/01/2026 Waikouaiti RC On the back of only two meetings that day as well. Quote
curious Posted 27 minutes ago Author Posted 27 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: But that won't work. The reason is you are not considering the other sources of revenue at that time. You would make a brilliant Cost Accountant. Hint: Yield. What the hell do you mean yield? That's exactly what's not there in sufficient quantum. There's stuff all other revenue. 90% comes from wagering revenue.. Quote
Reefton Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: But that won't work. The reason is you are not considering the other sources of revenue at that time. You would make a brilliant Cost Accountant. Hint: Yield. Listen halfwit. The ‘Yield’ facts clearly displayed in Curious’ table are that every dollar of industry money that goes into the stakes on those blood sucking big days gets far less of a ‘yield’ turnover wise than does the likes of Kumara Wairarapa or the other two Coast Clubs. I’d have forgotten more about ‘yield’ than you would ever know in ten lifetimes. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.