Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Operation Inca race-fixing charge against Canterbury driver-trainer dropped (dismissed!)


Rangatira

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

 

Well, if the RIU, JCA and the TAB had their shit together and not be so inconsistent then we would have nothing to talk (moan, complain) about.

How do some of these bodies cope with INCA? ?

despite the requests made by the Racecourse Inspector to the respondents to provide information emanating from criminal disclosure being deemed both lawful and reasonable by the JCA the RIU are faced with formidable opponents in the form of multiple QC's

so i am not sure they meet the threshold for coping

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brodie said:

What?

It is headlines Ranga!!!!!

Christchurch District Court Judge Raoul Neave dismissed the charge and McGrath was able to walk away. He had no name suppression, but one aspect of the case remains suppressed.

Prosecutor Karyn South told the court the Crown believed there was enough evidence but the "public interest test was not met".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rangatira said:

Christchurch District Court Judge Raoul Neave dismissed the charge and McGrath was able to walk away. He had no name suppression, but one aspect of the case remains suppressed.

Prosecutor Karyn South told the court the Crown believed there was enough evidence but the "public interest test was not met".

So the Crown Prosecutor has more credence than the Judge or authority?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rangatira said:

Christchurch District Court Judge Raoul Neave dismissed the charge and McGrath was able to walk away. He had no name suppression, but one aspect of the case remains suppressed.

Prosecutor Karyn South told the court the Crown believed there was enough evidence but the "public interest test was not met".

So isn’t the Judge dismissing the charge the same thing as the charge being dropped by the Judge, RANGA!!!!!!!!

Not sufficient evidence so charge had to be dropped, he wasn’t found not guilty, the bloody charge was dropped!!!!!

 

  • Like 1
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

So the Crown Prosecutor has more credence than the Judge or authority?

i am not 100% sure what you are getting at here chief

usually the crown would present and then the defence and the judge would make his decision based on that

i stand to be corrected but a judge can't drop charges but he can dismiss them

what i posted was from the stuff article which doesn't support the brodsters version of events.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/racing/114939089/operation-inca-racefixing-charge-against-canterbury-drivertrainer-dropped

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rangatira said:

i am not 100% sure what you are getting at here chief

usually the crown would present and then the defence and the judge would make his decision based on that

i stand to be corrected but a judge can't drop charges but he can dismiss them

what i posted was from the stuff article which doesn't support the brodsters version of events.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/racing/114939089/operation-inca-racefixing-charge-against-canterbury-drivertrainer-dropped

FFS, Ranga, are you deliberately trying to be a pain in the arse!

Can not be bothered with you as you are deliberately looking for an argument!

Dismissing and dropping to most semi intelligent would be one and the same, but not to you because you just want to be antagonistic!

Leave you to it 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rangatira said:

i stand to be corrected but a judge can't drop charges but he can dismiss them

 

1 hour ago, Rangatira said:

here you go again inventing your own facts :(

Good heavens Ranga, give it a rest. If you are going to be so pedantic about individual words and the interpretation of them by one individual then what is the point of discussing things.

Dismiss and drop....surely you have better things to do than twist obvious intention to suit your crusade.

  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rangatira said:

i am not 100% sure what you are getting at here chief

usually the crown would present and then the defence and the judge would make his decision based on that

i stand to be corrected but a judge can't drop charges but he can dismiss them

what i posted was from the stuff article which doesn't support the brodsters version of events.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/racing/114939089/operation-inca-racefixing-charge-against-canterbury-drivertrainer-dropped

Ranga, go and get into the ones on the Darkside and tell them that charges weren’t dropped, as they are saying the charges against McGrath were DROPPED!!!

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Happy Sunrise said:

 

Good heavens Ranga, give it a rest. If you are going to be so pedantic about individual words and the interpretation of them by one individual then what is the point of discussing things.

Dismiss and drop....surely you have better things to do than twist obvious intention to suit your crusade.

are you absolutely certain drop and dismiss are identical outcomes happy ?

where does withdraw fit into the equation ?

Edited by Rangatira
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rangatira said:

are you absolutely certain drop and dismiss are identical outcomes happy ?

But when Nowornever said this earlier you didn't seem to have a problem with it. Just when Brodie said it.

Just saw Nigel McGrath case was dropped this afternoon for lack of evidence!

Yes, there are differences with drop and dismiss but it is not about the words. 

Playing the man and not the ball seems to be the way at the moment.

  • Champ Post 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

But when Nowornever said this earlier you didn't seem to have a problem with it. Just when Brodie said it.

Just saw Nigel McGrath case was dropped this afternoon for lack of evidence!

was that before i responded to the nasty brodster ?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...