Guest CrossCodes Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) I had a bet on this race and tuned in a few minutes before the race and heard them talking about Valley Star and got very confused. The horse was scratched according to the TAB website and no dividend (Obviously) was on the screen. The race was run and won by this horse despite the fact you couldn’t actually place a bet on it, or include it in any multiple bets. This is a screenshot of the tab website during the running of the race..... note no Valley Star. Is this not just blatant fraud? Edited March 5, 2020 by CrossCodes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brodie Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Saw that as well! Was showing as scratched in my iPad, but on Trackside it was a starter and was showing the divs! Just an absolute shocker and what should the TAB do about it, as you couldn’t back it at all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Sunrise Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 48 minutes ago, CrossCodes said: I had a bet on this race and tuned in a few minutes before the race and heard them talking about Valley Star and got very confused. The horse was scratched according to the TAB website and no dividend (Obviously) was on the screen. The race was run and won by this horse despite the fact you couldn’t actually place a bet on it, or include it in any multiple bets. This is a screenshot of the tab website during the running of the race..... note no Valley Star. Is this not just blatant fraud? Might be in the stipes report. Didn't some office lady get blamed a few years ago for a muck up similar to this? I can't remember exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Sunrise Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 52 minutes ago, CrossCodes said: The horse was scratched according to the TAB website Not according to HRNZ. Just Steel Dust who is not in your screenshot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusty Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 RIU have labeled it an "admin error". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangatira Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, Rusty said: RIU have labeled it an "admin error". are the admin dept flogging the overtime ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CrossCodes Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, Rusty said: RIU have labeled it an "admin error". That’s simply not good enough. The TAB have taken bets on in the few minutes prior to the race (maybe longer) without the favourite in the market. So anyone who had taken bets thinking this horse wasn’t in the race (which going by the TAB website it wasn’t) just have to take the loss? If someone took this to the commerce commission they would win hands down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangatira Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, CrossCodes said: If someone took this to the commerce commission they would win hands down. rip into it brodster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusty Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Bets placed during the time that the horse was shown to be scratched, should be refunded. They won't be. But they should be. Do the right thing NZ TAB and cop it on the chin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.