-
Available Subscriptions
The Rest of the World
73,409 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 452 views
-
- 0 replies
- 680 views
-
- 0 replies
- 379 views
-
- 0 replies
- 411 views
-
- 0 replies
- 462 views
-
- 0 replies
- 432 views
-
- 0 replies
- 849 views
-
- 0 replies
- 467 views
-
- 0 replies
- 683 views
-
- 0 replies
- 460 views
-
- 0 replies
- 395 views
-
- 0 replies
- 420 views
-
- 0 replies
- 452 views
-
- 0 replies
- 423 views
-
- 0 replies
- 427 views
-
- 0 replies
- 411 views
-
- 0 replies
- 454 views
-
- 0 replies
- 833 views
-
- 0 replies
- 569 views
-
- 0 replies
- 563 views
-
- 0 replies
- 511 views
-
- 0 replies
- 748 views
-
- 0 replies
- 754 views
-
- 0 replies
- 756 views
-
- 0 replies
- 583 views
Announcements
-
Popular Now
-
Posts
-
By Chief Stipe · Posted
It was a percentage of turnover on the respective sport and that sport needed to have a National Organisation in order to receive the revenue. As far as I know Racing didn't directly get any of that money except that which wasn't allocated. Of course there was a contribution to overheads from Sport. -
Other Kennels should have plenty of time, there is a working group in Wellington according to Peters who are due to report back to the minister next month, so four months after the ban the Wellington crowd are still having meeting after meeting after meeting, so there is a window of opportunity to get their operations relocated across the Tasman. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
What does that mean and where did you extract it from? Source please. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Where have they "failed miserably" in NZ? Bear in mind they were taking over an existing business along with its existing compliance issues if any. The alledged NZ'er in the article was obviously betting with Ladbrokes Australia. I guess geo-blocking will stop that. -
By Kit Walker · Posted
The partnership (ENTAIN and THE TAB )agreement provides no opportunity for government intervention in its details or operation.
-
-
Topics
-
