Newmarket

Didnt see this on TV. Someone did great job with this photo.

I agree, but even when they get to straight, seems most loose ground

Great day alright, but i must ask. What has happened with the back runners on this track. Even races where there was a bit of a duel up front, nothing came from well back and paid div.

Amazing how many from the stable raced very fired up, just didnt settle? Nothing came from back today

I too like Greg, but if drivers were punting on their own drives, they are allowed to do this. So was this the case, or not?

I have no problem with any of them training horses and taking to the track. It is their living, lets think of their families etc, hardly going to do anything with so many eyes on them are they, this court case could go on for many months.

End of a partnership today?

Top field

Nah, not really. One thing i do like about Methven, usually the horses that handle grass & that long straight win. Dont have too many unlucky in the run

I think once anyone mentions 71 year olds, people get less interested. They think of their nanas playing bingo and their gramps puttin a buck on the nags. Nobody wants to see a pensioner charged

Do you get the feeling that some of those charged, may get off due to police / media actions?

I see Awaytocullect in r6 & r7? R6 is very weak, would start fav, so hope it starts r7. No luck last couple, grows a leg on grass, the only certainty all day. Rachmanicov will like grass too, should be a good bet, even with trev?

Dubbie, Welcome to this site, but i am not too sure that something Sting has said holds much sway, maybe we need a speech from The Rolling Stones, see if drugs make you fall from a coconut tree? Look at Mexico, drugs are legal in small amounts, yet people are killed daily.

Martin van beynon got a serve did he?

If you look at the comments regarding Andrew Stuart, both races at Rangiora & Addington mentioned do not match the correct dates? Really, if you look at the allegations, it seems a few others will soon suface if you look at races mentioned

Maybe different hot pools!!

Richie might be on the money, at last somebody is! HA HA

Did consider going to court today, while it would have been interesting, i didnt think they needed more eyes on them at a difficult time. None i would call mates, but a few i have met on several occasions. And before anyone asks, no i have never texted, called or been given a tip from them.

Strange that so many still want name suppresion, its been splashed all over the media, everyone knows who they are, yet they are still fighting, bizzare. Have to give Andrew Stuart a bit of credit for not battling for name suppresion. Now, here is my thinking on this. If i was arrested, and was innocent, i would want this quickly dealt with, name is known so what is the use of name suppresion, so some sort of normality can resume. If i was arrested, but guilty, well yes, i would fight for name suppresion, lawyer would be buying time, trying every trick in the book to find loopholes to weasle out. Going to be a long drawn out process, that is gonna cost heaps in lawyers bills, but i suppose it is your job, which pays the family bills.

Is old news by the time you read it Globe, but hot off the press when i posted, because now it has been taken down. Dont take it personally globe, but truth has to come out, you cant keep living in a 70 year old bubble and pretending its not happening, which by the stories on here, its always happened, its crooked. And ive had enough of it

But maybe he can assist?

Your spot n Taka, assisting seems to be the word. Strange thing, it seems info on Andrew Stuart has now been taken off stuff?

Did say over $1000

A bit of info

Brodie, for somebody who tells everybody your on the money, you let yourself down. Its irrelevant how much he stood to profit, if proven its a terrible look for the game. Do you think he did it all by himself?? Who else was involved, how much for them. Come on, your making yourself look bloody stupid, from your first post on this thread.