Freda

I mention it because it is another example of a lack of forward planning, rather just knee-jerk reactions to events. The accident from which all this angst comes from should never have happened, a young woman's life ruined, because systems weren't up to scratch. Of course trials weren't slow canters...ffs. As for my 'assessment' of the track, I reported what I was told on the day by riders. I wasn't out there riding. Obviously. There would have been others who, depending upon the horses they rode, may not have been bothered as much. One senior rider told me this morning that he thought it rode as well as it had all year. But, he qualified, it has been the worst this year as it has ever been.

Exactly. The track itself has been the victim of mismanagement and misinformation, but too much water under the bridge and, as Reefton stated, the legal ramifications have led to the current situation. No way back, ever.

To do what, exactly? I agree, not a good state of affairs. But the die has been cast ( as far as Riccarton is concerned ) with firstly, the increase in meetings there, and latterly, the push to reduce racedays elsewhere. The AWT will certainly reduce the wear and tear on the grass course proper, but it isn't quite ready yet. Fulton Hogan have more work to do yet, then trials have to take place. The bloody place was so waterlogged after National meeting that remedial work would have been very difficult indeed.

Pitty would agree with me here - often the rail is NOT the best place to be. Shorter trip, yes, but if the rail is off then its the worst place to be.

Not yet.

I would - and I think most would - expect a higher standard of ethical behaviour from lawyers, not less.

Well, it'll be character-building for them to realise just how it feels then.

Sand? not as far as I am aware. The rail out forced horses onto the area used for galloping, over the winter. With another meeting in a fortnight, another a fortnight after that, then Cup meeting, they would have had no choice but to try and protect that inner portion - what else can they do in that time-frame? Hammer Ashburton again ? they have their own feature meeting next month ,and no track manager! I'm sure they are doing their best, and local farmers, if co-operative, would undoubtedly be very competent. But, not ideal for them, going forward. Meantime, Rangiora sits twenty minutes up the road, unused and unwanted.

They can send some ground staff too when they post down a rider. My young lady helped them because they were short, got smacked in the head in the swab box, week off with concussion and I've got no staff now.

Very smart horse indeed.

The track was rated D4, and grass cover looked good. Should have suited all horses. However my first runner stripped all four of his fetlocks - which he has never done before. Riders reported to me track was hard, rough and full of holes. I know there has been a lot of work done, but this just shows the hammering the track took over the winter and how it is next to impossible to repair given Canterbury's climate and the soil composition.

I can't even find The Alphonso!

Really?

Shame. But very good racehorse and should find an excellent new home.

A fair bit of work has been done, the rain was welcome though; Canterbury at this time of the year firms up very quickly. Good sole of grass from what I can see.

That's Ok, J.B......our defence forces are a tad occupied at present, guarding MIQ centres.

I seem to recall reading something posted - by Curious? - that indicated it was not possible to enforce existing staff [ in any situation ] to be vaccinated, but that it was acceptable to require some tasks to be undertaken by vaccinated persons. The requirement to be vaccinated may be part of a new job description, though, and I don't see how that is a problem. Surely, any employer is entitled to have conditions upon who is, or isn't suitable?

Be interesting, J.B. I have yet to see anyone -or any organization - here who has the kahunas to front this issue. I don't see that such enforcement can be mandatory all the same.

I can see a few staff shortages if this happens. 😠

God, no!

Ah. That's a shame. Home again I guess.

Done. No more galloping and hasn't been for a year at least.

No 'might' about it. No brainer IMO.

Actually, no, I wasn't.

Years ago, when racing was run, well, better than now, the Racecourse D's used to go around trainers with apprentices, interview them, check out accommodation if on-site, and make sure the youngsters were paid correctly and had no complaints. No doubt, there were plenty who were too scared to complain..but at least the intention was there. Trainers also had to make sure that the lads had a MINIMUM of 18 rides a year. Bugger all, but again, at least the intention was there. As far as I am aware, there has always been a minimum wage in NZ employment, but obviously, employers got around that somehow because, as NM has said, racing has a terrible rap with the wider public with employment matters. Trainers, as a whole, back then, weren't as screwed financially as many are now, but staff still weren't well treated in many cases. Now, no one seems to ensure conditions are met properly, so unless the youngster has a strong personality, or someone to stand up for them, nothing happens. Economics now make it very hard indeed for many trainers to compete, wages-wise, with the wider labour market, there is just no meat on the bones left. No wonder that the big, successful operations can snaffle good staff more easily....those that haven't already left our shores. In the absence of keen young kiwis, no wonder we are left with a bunch of imports from other jurisdictions to try and make up the jockey numbers. Many from Asia or Sth Africa, UK and Ireland. And it is fair to say [ with no intention to denigrate these riders, many of whom are my friends ] if they were any bloody good at all, they wouldn't be here in the first place.