Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Drop the crop


Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Special Agent said:

Who is claiming to know everyone and everything?

I must say though I am disppointed, given how well you know her, at your dissing of Freda.

 

Sticks and stones, plenty more in life to be concerned about, than comments from a former jockey.   I've observed many jockeys over the years, good, bad, all sorts.

Of all, one of the best we've ever seen, CWJ, stands out for not just his consummate skill but his empathy for his mounts and his genuine love for the animal...the animal that, over millennia, has pulled our carts, ploughed our fields, died in the battlefield, carefully carried children and the disabled, and run its guts out for no good reason other than we ask it of them.

Some others, also very good jockeys, show their class as humans by smashing their mounts over the head and/or ripping the bit through their teeth when annoyed or having difficulties. 

So a critique, however minor from a 'jockey' who thinks horses cheat is nothing to be bothered about.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Freda said:

plenty more in life to be concerned about, than comments from a former jockey. 

Haven't you been espousing (here and elsewhere) the fact that your partner was a former jockey???

A well heeled gentleman came to me for advice not that long ago. He'd been offered shares in a horse to be trained by you. My advice to him was that although she'd been in the game a long time, she wouldn't know whether a horse was any good or not !

Regardless of the sanctimonious nonsense dictated above, you've used horses to obtain a living for close to fifty years.

  • Bad Post 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many top trainers have been fooled by a 'morning glory' or let down badly by a horse they rated....equally, some have been surprised to see the ugly duckling blossom into a superior performer.

Opinion and assessment are subjective  - and like arseholes, we all have one.

If the well-heeled gentleman took yours at face value without bothering to involve me in his decision,  it's just as well we never met.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, billy connolly said:

Haven't you been espousing (here and elsewhere) the fact that your partner was a former jockey???

A well heeled gentleman came to me for advice not that long ago. He'd been offered shares in a horse to be trained by you. My advice to him was that although she'd been in the game a long time, she wouldn't know whether a horse was any good or not !

Regardless of the sanctimonious nonsense dictated above, you've used horses to obtain a living for close to fifty years.

The sanctimonious and disparaging comment about Freda that you make above suggests that you must be or have been a very successful trainer. Perhaps you would let us know some of your successes that establish your credibility to offer such critique? Or, are you just another of those that you refer to who claim to know everyone and everything but actually know very little?

I'm leaning towards the latter conclusion to date.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, curious said:

The sanctimonious and disparaging comment about Freda that you make above suggests that you must be or have been a very successful trainer. Perhaps you would let us know some of your successes that establish your credibility to offer such critique? Or, are you just another of those that you refer to who claim to know everyone and everything but actually know very little?

I'm leaning towards the latter conclusion to date.

Curious, we've all known the Jimmy Tomkinson's, Noel Eales's and Ray Verner's of this world.

Successful trainers do not talk with such venom.  That is the work of a failure or a wannabe.

Freda is right.  There are much more important parts to life on earth, which is a very short time to boot.  We can all have a far more pleasant experience conversing with those on a similar wave length, rather than with a stunted and inferior version of a former top class comedian, because the billy connolly on here isn't even funny.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Special Agent said:

Curious, we've all known the Jimmy Tomkinson's, Noel Eales's and Ray Verner's of this world.

Successful trainers do not talk with such venom.  That is the work of a failure or a wannabe.

Freda is right.  There are much more important parts to life on earth, which is a very short time to boot.  We can all have a far more pleasant experience conversing with those on a similar wave length, rather than with a stunted and inferior version of a former top class comedian, because the billy connolly on here isn't even funny.

Now that post IS funny!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So two winning whip CHEATERS at Trentham...Sam Weatherley in the last..got five days

Tegan Newman...$1200 fine...

Both 60% over before the 100m mark...enabling progress when others were obeying the rules ok?

Remember...whip v non whip analysis in Britain showed whipped horses run faster...who knew?

And then there's the unnecessary and cruel practise of FLANK whipping...NZTR signed up to banning it...then reneged 

A constant abuser of flank whipping among many others..Joe Doyle pictured on Saturday

Note the contact of the non padded polymer digging into the highly sensitive skin in that area

WIN_20240319_12_48_14_Pro.jpg

Edited by Thomass
  • Like 1
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rules are the problem. Can't do this, can't do that but yes as long as you don't do this and then you can do that but not twice past this point. Then if the jockey has three consecutive strikes instead of one, no strike on next stride, then one again, imagine the uproar if the horse is DQ because a jockey used the whip 3 times instead of twice. So advantage to the clever cheats. And do you think NZTR have either the intelligence or the guts tidy this mess up?   

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Thomass said:

Note the contact of the non padded polymer digging into the highly sensitive skin in that area

WIN_20240319_12_48_14_Pro.jpg

I don't think the action of the mechanical horses is helping young riders practice with the whip.  The mechanical horse goes up and down compared to the real thing.  The shot above looks like a mechanical horse induced whip action.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Special Agent said:

I don't think the action of the mechanical horses is helping young riders practice with the whip.  The mechanical horse goes up and down compared to the real thing.  The shot above looks like a mechanical horse induced whip action.

But you don't know if @Thomass got Princess Kate to photoshop the shot!

  • Fake News! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Special Agent said:

I don't think the action of the mechanical horses is helping young riders practice with the whip.  The mechanical horse goes up and down compared to the real thing.  The shot above looks like a mechanical horse induced whip action.

You maybe right?

The British Racing Assoc. relented on their backhand only rule where this action enabled more strikes to the flank/ribs...

Also women jockeys have shorter arms on average...watch Lisa Allpress..a classic flank striker...

Craig Grylls is another ...

However...what the RIB and NZTR are turning a blind eye to is the constant flicking the flank after a strike...

Sam Spratt has perfected it so well under the new rules that her strike rate has improved markedly...ask Stephen Hunt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

But you don't know if @Thomass got Princess Kate to photoshop the shot!

I'm technically illiterate so #yeana

It was on Weigh In and moi simply screen shot it...

Here's another massive whip violation in last years Wellington Steeples...with WELTS...courtesy of Shaun Fannin..

Fined only for 'over the shoulder' I asked the RIB "do you routinely look for welts after observing hard over the shoulder strikes"?

Answer #yeana

In fact in this instance they said "the vet was too busy to look"

I asked "are the stipes without cameras and cant decide for themselves if a welt is a welt"?

FFS...look and weep

WIN_20230718_09_42_42_Pro.jpg

WIN_20230718_09_48_41_Pro.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chief Stipe said:

Photo shopped whip porn courtesy of @Thomass!

Please stop this incessant trolling 

As I said I'm too dumb and technically too thick to have the 'smarts' enough to do a Kate..

In factit appears one gets into deep shit if one does..

plus I despise deep fake and deep shit...ok dipshit? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Thomass said:

Please stop this incessant trolling 

As I said I'm too dumb and technically too thick to have the 'smarts' enough to do a Kate..

In factit appears one gets into deep shit if one does..

plus I despise deep fake and deep shit...ok dipshit? 

You're a fake and a flake Thomass.

As for trolling - it's OK for you to troll the forum with your BS but not OK for anyone to call you out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then Jockeys 'accidently on purpose' use the edge of the flap...making serious progress through the skin and into the muscle...

...this time Mike McNab...the entire straight he used the edge in this instance

Rule "jockeys must NOT use the edge of the flap"

WIN_20230726_15_03_01_Pro.jpg

  • Fake News! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...