Nowornever Posted July 13 Posted July 13 (edited) Still something funny going on with the TAB algorithms. Some real movers happening in the last 5mins. If you are lucky you can get nearly double the closing dividend in the last five minutes on some runners. When the money goes on a favourite the others drift big time before coming in again in the last few minutes. I had a couple of decent multis teed up ready to run to the tote but Tim Williams has ruined my plans on the biggest of them. I took Vesta at 12 dollars but you could have gotten 26 in the last few minutes so was a bit worried about the drift, was expecting it to get in to about 7 or 8 dollars. Don't you hate it when your horse never gets a run and in doing so ruins the dividend for next time. Not sure he was trying that hard or got out driven, either way it was robbed. Edited July 13 by Nowornever 1 Quote
Brodie Posted July 13 Author Posted July 13 5 minutes ago, Nowornever said: Still something funny going on with the TAB algorithms. Some real movers happening in the last 5mins. If you are lucky you can get nearly double the closing dividend in the last five minutes on some runners. When the money goes on a favourite the others drift big time before coming in again in the last few minutes. I had a couple of decent multis teed up ready to run to the tote but Tim Williams has ruined my plans on the biggest of them. I took Vesta at 12 dollars but you could have gotten 26 in the last few minutes so was a bit worried about the drift, was expecting it to get in to about 7 or 8 dollars. Don't you hate it when your horse never gets a run and in doing so ruins the dividend for next time. Not sure he was trying that hard or got out driven, either way it was robbed. The TAB alter the fixed odds far too late to be able to wager apart from on account!! As I said the other night if someone gets a wee bit on they slash the divs and then they get very little money on it unless it moved out and that is often far too late! not going to name them but there have been some very poor drives this week that shows lack of nous from some. Hard to fathom why some trainers keep on putting on the same driver week in and week out when they are less than average in the cart? Maybe the owners have more money than sense? 1 Quote
Nowornever Posted July 13 Posted July 13 6 minutes ago, Brodie said: The TAB alter the fixed odds far too late to be able to wager apart from on account!! As I said the other night if someone gets a wee bit on they slash the divs and then they get very little money on it unless it moved out and that is often far too late! not going to name them but there have been some very poor drives this week that shows lack of nous from some. Hard to fathom why some trainers keep on putting on the same driver week in and week out when they are less than average in the cart? Maybe the owners have more money than sense? Yes I spotted a couple of real shockers from some repeat serial offenders who shall remain nameless but have been upgraded to my list of drivers who wouldn't get room in a one horse field. 1 1 Quote
Brodie Posted July 13 Author Posted July 13 (edited) 52 minutes ago, Nowornever said: Yes I spotted a couple of real shockers from some repeat serial offenders who shall remain nameless but have been upgraded to my list of drivers who wouldn't get room in a one horse field. Not sure what is going on at the moment with junior drivers? We are fortunate that we have females in the harness industry and of the 8 horses in the juniors race just now at Addington 6 were driven by females. I appreciate that We have our best juniors in Canterbury in Oz at the moment and yes they are the best! There have been some very poor drives by Juniors this weekend and it just shows how much of a difference in ability between the ones in Oz representing NZ apart from a couple and the rest! Questioning how many will be able to make a career in harness after they are out of their Junior claims? Edited July 13 by Brodie 1 Quote
the galah Posted July 13 Posted July 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Nowornever said: Still something funny going on with the TAB algorithms. Some real movers happening in the last 5mins. If you are lucky you can get nearly double the closing dividend in the last five minutes on some runners. When the money goes on a favourite the others drift big time before coming in again in the last few minutes. I had a couple of decent multis teed up ready to run to the tote but Tim Williams has ruined my plans on the biggest of them. I took Vesta at 12 dollars but you could have gotten 26 in the last few minutes so was a bit worried about the drift, was expecting it to get in to about 7 or 8 dollars. Don't you hate it when your horse never gets a run and in doing so ruins the dividend for next time. Not sure he was trying that hard or got out driven, either way it was robbed. i backed that one as well.yes,i guess if it starts in the same field next week it will only pay $3,which will be unders, with no guarantee it will get the same nice run. 1 hour ago, Brodie said: The TAB alter the fixed odds far too late to be able to wager apart from on account!! As I said the other night if someone gets a wee bit on they slash the divs and then they get very little money on it unless it moved out and that is often far too late! not going to name them but there have been some very poor drives this week that shows lack of nous from some. Hard to fathom why some trainers keep on putting on the same driver week in and week out when they are less than average in the cart? Maybe the owners have more money than sense? sometimes the good drivers don't get it right as well. Like j dunn on beautiful crazy,i thought it very obvious if he pulled it out craig thornley would pull out in front of him and give him the 1/1.He could have done that well before he did. R Cameron just ended up outdriving him and won the race. Not sure beautiful crazy would have placed anyway as it just battled,but did seem to miss an obvious opportunity. Some trainers are very loyal. d mcgowan one of those. I backed one of his the other night paying $21,which i found hard to believe and all it had to do was pull off the inside to win,but it didn't . I guess thats why it was paying $21 and i should have known what to expect.i. having said that,most of the drivers are consistent. Its the ones that every now and again pull off when they don't normally,that can be the ones that are frustrating. That last race ,a big win mover was sweet dreams. Now j howe is another trainer who is very loyal.fair enough,He puts the same drivers on ,even when you get the odd one that doesn't suit that driver.sweet dreams is a horse like that. Its certainly no champ, but r holmes drove it the week before and asked it to be a racehorse and it tried and ran 2nd.i know r close is a good driver and punters keep backing it.Then again j howe may think its best going to the back and inside devery time.If thats the case r close would be a genious. I know r close is a good driver but not sure why punters keep backing that horse. some of the form during the winter can be a bit inconsistent. That royal deidre who won that race just run i've noticed go a couple of good races but never the same week to week .Next week it can have every chance and stops,then again good and bad. Well today it sat parked and won easy.I see m cross tipped it. Maybe hes got it worked out. Edited July 13 by the galah Quote
the galah Posted July 13 Posted July 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Brodie said: Not sure what is going on at the moment with junior drivers? We are fortunate that we have females in the harness industry and of the 8 horses in the juniors race just now at Addington 6 were driven by females. I appreciate that We have our best juniors in Canterbury in Oz at the moment and yes they are the best! There have been some very poor drives by Juniors this weekend and it just shows how much of a difference in ability between the ones in Oz representing NZ apart from a couple and the rest! Questioning how many will be able to make a career in harness after they are out of their Junior claims? i posted last week that theres actually more women junior drivers currently in nz than there are men. some very good drivers amongst them . o thornley is good. i think g thornley lost her driving form beofre she had the break, but has come back and is driving very well. Horses run for both of them. I think the reason theres more women is,men look at the industry and say ,can i make a living and have a family down the track as well. And the answer is ,unless your in the top handful,no you won't make a resonable living . And being able to look after a women financially of course is part of the attraction process. women know,no point marrying a good guy who's got no money. Its not easy for a wife who does that.I know,my wife,god bless her soul,reminds me of that every time i moan about not having enough money.oops,i've gone off track. anyways,back to the driving.Whereas the females look at it and say,well my priority is doing something i enjoy over finacial considerations, and down the track i can marry someone who earns enough to support me,then they can come back into it again when they want. actually, one thing i've noticed is woman who are drivers and can make a living,don't seem to have too many chidren Now thats just an observation,but then again women in general, don't seem to have as many children these days.Wheres all the catholics when you need them. Actually talking about children,i remember the days when addington had that big grandstand . About the 150 metre from the finsih,at the top of the stand,there used to sit enough young members of the butt families to fill a bus.Ok.maybe not that many,but there was a lot of them.No need for family reunions. They had one every week. You don't see that these days.I remember those days. My aunty would come occasionally and admire the le lievre families wonderful hair. Obviously that was a few years ago as i think their hair lines may receded a bit since then. Then i remember one day,my uncle pointing out a racecourse inspector chasing a bloke who wasn't allowed on course. I'm not sure whther he went on to own a nz cup winner or maybe that was his brother. ah the memories,anyways again,back to the junior drivers. as to your point about how many will make it after their junior status ends. Thats the thing isn't it. Hrnz focus on the juniors and neglect those very same people when they lose their junior status. I mean ask yourself.Say you may have got 4 drives a week,well if you throw in a stablehands wage, then you could probably pay the bills. But then you lose your junior status,,you now only get 1 or 2,so your income drops by $200. Who needs the free boots,skivvy,harness,free licence renewals,helmets,vests,everything is free.. The persosn who's just lost their junior status is more likely to have financial commitments..Yet they have to pay for everything and cross subsidise the juniors free stuff,even though the juniors are getting more drives and earning more. So thats why you see mnay drivers disappearing. Especially the males. Also the smaller the field size,whether it be at the races or the trials ,the less opportunity the drivers who drive will get. Edited July 13 by the galah 2 Quote
Brodie Posted July 13 Author Posted July 13 (edited) Very accurate posting Galah. Do we know how many new Junior drivers have been licensed over the last year or so? I acknowledge that it is the love of the horse and industry that makes these Juniors want to be a driver nowadays rather than any monetary return. Very hard way to make a living, early morning starts, long hours and physically very demanding. Why would you want to be employed in the industry if there is not much future in it? I have no idea how much Junior drivers are earning, but the ones with UDR’s that are low will not be getting that much as winning % would be the icing on the cake. We need a constant number of young ones coming thru the stables and driving and training to replace the ones that are giving up driving and training for the industry to continue. HRNZ have told us that things are looking very rosey and suppose if they say it is then we have to believe it LOL Thing is why is this Committee needed to be formed and also just read that the Gallops and Harness are getting together to work for the one cause! When has this ever needed to happen in NZ racing bearing in mind there will be no greyhounds this time next year! Edited July 13 by Brodie 2 Quote
Nowornever Posted July 18 Posted July 18 👀 $18,000 on Zarlini at $4.50! Did they get the wrong race? Surely they didn't really want to put that much on Zarlini 🤦♂️ They have got bigger balls than me. I wouldn't have risked $10 on that horse from that draw! 2 Quote
Brodie Posted July 18 Author Posted July 18 (edited) 12 hours ago, Nowornever said: 👀 $18,000 on Zarlini at $4.50! Did they get the wrong race? Surely they didn't really want to put that much on Zarlini 🤦♂️ They have got bigger balls than me. I wouldn't have risked $10 on that horse from that draw! On the face of it the field was probably slightly weaker than what she had been racing in recent weeks? However personally would not consider it a great win bet, as you say from the draw and think Zarlini is probably better over longer trip! What is extremely frustrating is the fact that the NZ TAB is prepared to accept wagering from some preferential punters who are allowed to net $80,000, thats correct $80,000!!!!! Other punters or clients of the NZ TAB are only allowed to net a few hundred dollars????? Totally ethically and morally corrupt practice by the TAB, and is driving many punters away from bothering nowadays. Edited July 18 by Brodie 1 1 Quote
Rangatira Posted July 19 Posted July 19 24 minutes ago, Brodie said: What is extremely frustrating is the fact that the NZ TAB is prepared to accept wagering from some preferential punters who are allowed to net $80,000, thats correct $80,000!!!!! Raleigh Chopper dependent riders face no restrictions even if it is in the Pawn Shop with the direct credit option. 1 Quote
mikeynz Posted July 19 Posted July 19 1 hour ago, Brodie said: What is extremely frustrating is the fact that the NZ TAB is prepared to accept wagering from some preferential punters who are allowed to net $80,000, thats correct $80,000!!!!! Other punters or clients of the NZ TAB are only allowed to net a few hundred dollars????? Totally ethically and morally corrupt practice by the TAB, and is driving many punters away from bothering nowadays. More than likely they would be losing punters, just like the one last night, on the other hand you could say that under the responsible gambling protocols they could have said no to the bet but they will only start doing that if one was a regular winner. 3 Quote
Brodie Posted July 19 Author Posted July 19 (edited) 5 hours ago, mikeynz said: More than likely they would be losing punters, just like the one last night, on the other hand you could say that under the responsible gambling protocols they could have said no to the bet but they will only start doing that if one was a regular winner. Mikey, from the so called Big Bet alerts that Trackside have been putting up over the past month or so, there are punters with more money than sense! Most that they put up and not big bets at all, many are at the minimum $2k minimum net for a fixed win bet! Yet they limit these bets to the odd amounts that make the $2k and yet whoever is betting on the Stonewall horses is allowed anything he likes on them with the TAB? Favouritism to this punter because of who he is is pretty disgusting and hopefully he starts winning big time and then lets see what they do? Edited July 19 by Brodie 1 Quote
mikeynz Posted July 19 Posted July 19 Be interesting to know if any big players load up on the ABs tonight, 1 10 isn't much unless you have a lot on, big punters can't go anywhere else now. Quote
Brodie Posted July 19 Author Posted July 19 1 hour ago, mikeynz said: Be interesting to know if any big players load up on the ABs tonight, 1 10 isn't much unless you have a lot on, big punters can't go anywhere else now. Wouldnt be a great bet at the moment on the Blacks! Lol Quote
mikeynz Posted July 19 Posted July 19 30 minutes ago, Brodie said: Wouldnt be a great bet at the moment on the Blacks! Lol The odds will better now, but in the event of the French winning who wins......Entain. Quote
mikeynz Posted July 19 Posted July 19 (edited) The reality is with betfair you can trade during a match, cashout easily if your in profit or minimizing a loss,, just don't think the TAB is the place for big bets in play, the cashout is miserable, and sometimes it disappears completely or the betting is suspended, and when your spending big that's not the way to go. Edited July 19 by mikeynz Quote
Gammalite Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago This is the Thread Mr Galah. covers a Lot of interesting things and great topics, and some good fun from Ranga too. he's a funny bugger. Am sure there is some way to get Big bets on . If the Telfer 'team' can get bets on , and they're in the know of which horses are firing and that. They ALL seem to be going pretty well currently .the horses racing a true credit to Steve and Amanda. and the Stonewall set-up a credit to Mr Stockman and Jill Stockman doing a wonderful job , Syndicating many of the runners like AKATEA and that as well. Because some of the horses get beat and run 2nd or whatever, the Betting agency can get some collects as well , and are/seem quite willing to take on the Bets for many of the stable runners?. that's the way to keep the sport going👍. Josh Dickie not quite a s good as Tim in strike rate driving for Stonewall, but the opposition at Auckland racing is Super tough with 2 lots of Purdons now, the Ray Green team firing, Plenty of Butchers and that . very hard to win a race these days. Quote
the galah Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Gammalite said: This is the Thread Mr Galah. covers a Lot of interesting things and great topics, and some good fun from Ranga too. he's a funny bugger. Am sure there is some way to get Big bets on . If the Telfer 'team' can get bets on , and they're in the know of which horses are firing and that. They ALL seem to be going pretty well currently .the horses racing a true credit to Steve and Amanda. and the Stonewall set-up a credit to Mr Stockman and Jill Stockman doing a wonderful job , Syndicating many of the runners like AKATEA and that as well. Because some of the horses get beat and run 2nd or whatever, the Betting agency can get some collects as well , and are/seem quite willing to take on the Bets for many of the stable runners?. that's the way to keep the sport going👍. Josh Dickie not quite a s good as Tim in strike rate driving for Stonewall, but the opposition at Auckland racing is Super tough with 2 lots of Purdons now, the Ray Green team firing, Plenty of Butchers and that . very hard to win a race these days. the punter backing on the telfers seems to back the better chances from that stable so maybe he does have some inside information and is the fella mentioned.i don't know. The tab bookies do make some stuff ups sometimes. Like they said on trackside last night they lost $100,000 on that first starter from the dalgety stable that won.. to do that the bookies must be big gamblers themselves. Like how could you allow such a big liabilty.It won't have been on one bet,it would have been lots of bets. Any normal bookie would not take such big risks and would just reduce the odds more as they got more bets. Like they reduce the odds when the wahle watch tips something and people back it,which is just common sense. HRNZ should demand the tab bookies on harness be paid on commission as losing $100,000 on one horse you would think would mean the meeting wouldn't run at much of a profit,if at all and very little be returned to fund stakes to that meeting. actually,this afternoon, i was looking at a handful of races from about 15-20 years ago and the videos had the tote pools going across the screen. The ones i saw,the win pools were all around $50,000 and the place pools around $30,000. And that was for just run of the mill races. Yet here we are,20 years later,win pools at the likes of auckland premier friday meetings are often around $3500 and addington around $7500. i know more is bet on ff these days,but going by the percentage mr steele said was tote and was ff,theres no way they are anywhere near as big as the total tote pools of just 20 years ago. Yet,here they are racing for double the stake money now,than when they were when more was invested its hard to make much sense of that when you think about it. Edited 6 hours ago by the galah Quote
the galah Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 37 minutes ago, the galah said: actually,this afternoon, i was looking at a handful of races from about 15-20 years ago and the videos had the tote pools going across the screen. The ones i saw,the win pools were all around $50,000 and the place pools around $30,000. And that was for just run of the mill races. Yet here we are,20 years later,win pools at the likes of auckland premier friday meetings are often around $3500 and addington around $7500. i know more is bet on ff these days,but going by the percentage mr steele said was tote and was ff,theres no way they are anywhere near as big as the total tote pools of just 20 years ago. Yet,here they are racing for double the stake money now,than when they were when more was invested its hard to make much sense of that when you think about it. heres another point about that. the races with the big nz pools i mentioned from 20 years ago,i'm pretty sure they were not commingled pools.So that was nz punters betting on nz harness,in really big numbers.. the thing about when they introduced the comingling pools was nz punters,who weren't betting that much on australian racing,becuase the pools weren't big because of no commingling,then changed to betting on the aussie races instead of the nz races. then the tab,just kept increasing and increasing the numner of imported races . I remember when they started comingling they said they had about 15,000 imported raussie aces to bet on. Well these days don't they have well over 100,000 from all over. (Then of course theres the sports betting.). reality is the commingling created the reduction in nz punters money going to nz clubs,instead the % taken from the money bet for racing outside nz was redistributed to fund mostly australia,n but also other overseas racing. Actually,today you could have bet on races from mexico or turkey or puerto rico. so commingling caused nz punters to migrate from nz racing to overseas racing. Commingling was a seroius nail in the coffin,in having the nz publics focus taken away on nz racing. On one hand nz racing gained from the small % returned to the tab from overseas betting,but obn the other hand lost out on tyhe significant reduced nz betting and most importantly,commingled was the start of focus of nz punters on nz racing being lost. as they say,you better be careful what you wish for sometimes. Edited 5 hours ago by the galah 1 Quote
Gammalite Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, the galah said: so commingling caused nz punters to migrate from nz racing to overseas racing. Commingling was a seroius nail in the coffin,in having the nz publics focus taken away on nz racing. On one hand nz racing gained from the small % returned to the tab from overseas betting,but obn the other hand lost out on tyhe significant reduced nz betting and most importantly,commingled was the start of focus of nz punters on nz racing being lost. Definitely right . And of course ALL the Huge Sports events overseas are popular with punters these days. Someone like Curious on this forum is carrying on about Horse Whipping her and at another station ,like there's No tomorrow for racing. And he's involved in racing. Imagine what fringe participants must think.? the HORSE sports are bit on those nose . of the general public. Like the greyhounds too. My 2 kids wouldn't watch a horse race if I tried to force them (20 somethings aged) And Harness has been seriously tainted over the years too. Red Hots. I started here 6 years ago and was horrified at Everyone calling ALLStars Cheats for example with the many runners per race. Even yourself I remember a 4 page arguement with you about Amazing Dream and Beyond something . words. beyond Words . so People notice these sort of things. Mark Purdon near best of all time yet heavily criticised lol 🤣 It's more accepted these days . that stable-mates can help each other. Andretti given an easy lead by a stable-mate last night. Just made it a bigger certainty than it already was. I thought David Butchers 2 nice horses did a great job last week helping each other and mixing it up with a Star like AKUTA even. I admire that sort of stuff. everyone looking after their horse as best as possible. Dunn's have done it at times. You've been critical of QLD trotting at times where similar things occur with our larger stables. you just have to face the facts mate. you ain't gunna leave a stable-mate parked out if you don't have to. Nothing wrong with a cosy trail behind a horse that will Cart you into it from the quarter , and even let you through on occasion. ( that Ferguson one was ridiculous that time at AKLD , with that sacrificed 2 year-old against older horses. ) Quote
Brodie Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago So the TAB is prepared to take a liability of $100k on one horse and yet stop other punters from being able to wager on other horses? Totally flawed business plan and is backfiring on them. Time the Committee came out with what they have been discussing or has it not met as yet?? Quote
Nowornever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, the galah said: to do that the bookies must be big gamblers themselves. Like how could you allow such a big liabilty.It won't have been on one bet,it would have been lots of bets. Any normal bookie would not take such big risks and would just reduce the odds more as they got more bets. It does not make sense to me. Some of the big liabilities they claim on some of these horses and the price movement does not support the numbers so either they are: - Gambling on the result (Unlikely given they are so anal on managing risk) - Somehow laying off the liability somewhere. Maybe internally with their other bookmakers Ladbrokes or similar. - Not telling the truth and giving the impression you can win big with them and $100k loss is like water off a ducks back. I am going with option three at this stage. 1 Quote
Gammalite Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Personally I think someones pulling all your leg. Just seems like a Lot of BS. TABman should be able to tell us the truth about this sort of thing?. how much an NZ betting agency usually accepts as a bet? 4 hours ago, Brodie said: So the TAB is prepared to take a liability of $100k on one horse and yet stop other punters from being able to wager on other horses? No one will take that sort of a bet against a first starter? . in NZ too ? lol All the betting mobs in Australia are no where near that on the more popular gallopers. An NZ trotter ? can't see it somehow. Here's a selection of big bets from last week end on the Australian Gallops . From 3 or 4 popular Betting agencies. NOBODY anywhere near winning 100k. I would suggest the 100k NZ bet thing is made up dreamer by somebody. Think NoworNever is correct with his third option above somehow. The Valley – Race 6 No. 11 – Esha – $10,000 @ $2.20 The Valley – Race 4 No. 1 – Mornington Glory – $8750 @ $3.30 The Valley – Race 7 No. 5 – Sayedaty Sadaty – $4000 @ $3.20 Randwick – Race 7 No. 12 – Theblade – $4000 @ $3 The Valley – Race 1 No. 4 – Hovland – $3000 @ $3.60 Randwick – Race 3 No. 2 – Regimental Colours – $2000 @ $3.50 The Valley – Race 4 No. 3 – Oak Hill – $8000 @ $2.65 The Valley – Race 6 No. 11 – Esha – $7500 @ $2.20 The Valley – Race 3 No. 6 – Takeko – $5000 @ $5 Randwick – Race 4 No. 5 – Amreekiyah – $5000 @ $2.30 The Valley – Race 7 No. 5 – Sayedaty Sadaty – $5000 @ $3 Randwick – Race 6 No. 6 – Piggyback – $3000 @ $2.30 The Valley – Race 9 No. 14 – Naval Academy – $3000 @ $5 here's the TAB touch NZ divvies ones Belmont – Race 6 No. 6 – Essentric Nature – $3500 @ $3.20 Eagle Farm – Race 6 No. 1 – Earn To Burn – $3000 @ $3.90 Eagle Farm – Race 1 No. 6 – Kadall – $2500 @ $4 Belmont – Race 5 No. 6 – Horcrux – $2000 @ $4 Randwick – Race 6 No. 14 – Elle Hudson – $2000 @ $13 Belmont – Race 8 No. 4 – Want A Winner – $2000 @ $4.60 The Valley – Race 3 No. 8 – Enna's Dream – $1500 @ $4.20 Belmont – Race 1 No. 4 – Sunset Session – $1100 @ $14 Eagle Farm – Race 3 No. 13 – Berezka – $10,000 @ $3 The Valley – Race 4 No. 3 – Oak Hill – $10,000 @ $3 Randwick – Race 7 No. 12 – Theblade – $7500 @ $4.40 Randwick – Race 5 No. 4 – World Alliance – $6500 @ $3.90 The Valley – Race 6 No. 4 – Oyster Lane – $4500 @ $5 Randwick – Race 3 No. 8 – Karinska – $4000 @ $7 The Valley – Race 7 No. 9 – Nellie Leylax – $2000 @ $5 Morphettville – Race 7 No. 1 – Queman – $1500 (each way) @ $12/$3 Randwick – Race 9 No. 1 – More Felons – $1000 (each way) @ $12/$3.70 Palmer Bet. Randwick – Race 10 No. 8 – Be Real – $1000 (each way) @ $34/$8 Belmont – Race 2 No. 4 – Catch These Hands – $1000 @ $12 Belmont – Race 7 No. 12 – Stormchaser – $1000 (each-way) @ $6/$2.20 The Valley – Race 6 No. 11 – Esha – $3700 @ $2.15 Randwick – Race 7 No. 12 – Theblade – $1500 @ $3.15 Randwick – Race 8 No. 1 – Private Eye – $1500 @ $2.70 Eagle Farm – Race 5 No. 3 – Fioprospero – $1055 @ $2.90 Randwick – Race 3 No. 3 – Useapin – $1000 @ $5.15 Randwick – Race 3 No. 8 – Karinska – $1000 @ $8.75 Eagle Farm – Race 6 No. 3 – Impervious – $1000 @ $6 Eagle Farm – Race 6 No. 5 – Boomshanka – $1000 @ 4.40 Belmont – Race 6 No. 6 – Essentric Nature – $1000 @ $3 The Valley – Race 9 No. 1 – Apache Song – $1000 @ $4 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.