Shad Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Newmarket said: You have never seen a more lucky run on the rails in a Melbourne cup, and probably never see in future cups either. Amazing that with the fading runners coming back on the winner, it negotiated around them. The plunge grey did little, the overseas raiders are not ruling like they once did. Yes very valid point, they certainly parted like the red sea, reminded me a bit of Damask Rose winning the big race in Auckland, had to be good and was, many jockeys left the rail wide open, they said it was a great ride, but left with little options from the back, never went around a horse. 1 Quote
billy connolly Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 2 hours ago, Newmarket said: You have never seen a more lucky run on the rails in a Melbourne cup, and probably never see in future cups either. Amazing that with the fading runners coming back on the winner, it negotiated around them. That is the key, squire. Few jockeys ride for luck on a favorite, especially in a Melbourne Cup. Kingston Town was a near champion who got beat cause the jockey mistook the clock tower for the 800 metre mark ! Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet. 2 1 Quote
hesi Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago We had 2 potential staying 4 year olds in Derby winner Willydoit, whose 7th dam was Cuddle and Oaks winner Leica Lucy. But the new part owners of both horses chose to race both horses only up to 1600m, Willydoit, after a 4th in the Australian Derby. So we do still appear able to breed top class stayers. Derryn the sire of Leica Lucy a very moderately priced $5K fee and Tarzino (sire of Willydoit), himself a winner of the Victoria Derby, still moderately priced at $25K, and indeed sire of the 5th place getter in yesterday's cup, in Torranzino 1 Quote
Newmarket Posted 13 hours ago Author Posted 13 hours ago 10 hours ago, Shad said: Yes very valid point, they certainly parted like the red sea, reminded me a bit of Damask Rose winning the big race in Auckland, had to be good and was, many jockeys left the rail wide open, they said it was a great ride, but left with little options from the back, never went around a horse. Ouch…. Dont mention Damansk Rose, touchy subject for a certain person😆 1 Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 13 hours ago, Newmarket said: You have never seen a more lucky run on the rails in a Melbourne cup, and probably never see in future cups either. Amazing that with the fading runners coming back on the winner, it negotiated around them. You really are a plonker. First you bag the horse AND Jockey and after the race you say it was a lucky run. Jamie placed the horse perfectly and put it to sleep until the right time. Pushed through the gaps when needed and the horse did the rest. Not much luck at all. As you should know, but obviously don't, over 3200m at Flemington the gaps will happen as horses tire up a very long straight. Just requires a patient calm rider of the calibre of Jamie Melham to ride through them. 2 1 Quote
Newmarket Posted 8 hours ago Author Posted 8 hours ago 2 hours ago, Chief Stipe said: You really are a plonker. First you bag the horse AND Jockey and after the race you say it was a lucky run. Jamie placed the horse perfectly and put it to sleep until the right time. Pushed through the gaps when needed and the horse did the rest. Not much luck at all. As you should know, but obviously don't, over 3200m at Flemington the gaps will happen as horses tire up a very long straight. Just requires a patient calm rider of the calibre of Jamie Melham to ride through them. Gee you get upset…. After seeing the overhead replays a few times, you would have to say the horse was lucky to have an uninterrupted run on the inside, forget the horse or jockey. Maybe post a clip of other Melbourne cup winners that you think are similar….you will struggle Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Newmarket said: Gee you get upset…. Sorry to shatter you delusion but I'm not upset. It is actually amusing reading the crap you write albeit now becoming repetitive. 1 hour ago, Newmarket said: After seeing the overhead replays a few times, you would have to say the horse was lucky to have an uninterrupted run on the inside, forget the horse or jockey. The gaps were always going to come. They always do over 3200m and it is easier to push past a tiring horse. Contrary to what some amateur punters think, such as yourself, a Jockey on a tiring horse will often move over for one full of running. Of course the difference is it was 3200m NOT a sprint. Also tiring horses will drift off the rail. Jamie rode the perfect patient race especially when you read the real hard luck stories from the other Jockey's where their charges clipped heels, didn't settle, got caught 3 wide etc. Also another factor was when Land Legend surged to the lead and upper the tempo at the halfway point which made some gaps in the field and made a staying test. Jamie being the cool calm experienced Jockey she is didn't panic. She got the horse to settle beautifully, took the shortest route home and pushed the go button at the right time. 1 hour ago, Newmarket said: Maybe post a clip of other Melbourne cup winners that you think are similar….you will struggle I wouldn't struggle but quite frankly educating you would do a disservice to the NZ Racing industry as they need your regular valuable monetary contribution. 1 Quote
curious Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 18 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said: The gaps were always going to come. They always do over 3200m and it is easier to push past a tiring horse. Contrary to what some amateur punters think, such as yourself, a Jockey on a tiring horse will often move over for one full of running. Of course the difference is it was 3200m NOT a sprint. Also tiring horses She did have a slight advantage on the gap opening up. “I said, ‘Move over Ben, I’m coming through!’” Edited 6 hours ago by curious 1 1 Quote
Chief Stipe Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 38 minutes ago, curious said: She did have a slight advantage on the gap opening up. “I said, ‘Move over Ben, I’m coming through!’” Yeah but his horse was stuffed and I imagine they have a joint bank account!!! 1 Quote
curious Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Half to him': Melham's unique deal with husband Ben Talintyre After winning the Melbourne Cup Jamie Melham may regret promising half the prizemoney to her husband and fellow jockey Ben in the lead-up to the great race. “Ben loves the name,” Melham said about her Melbourne Cup mount Half Yours. Jamie Melham pictured with her husband Ben Melham. (Photo by Jay Town/Racing Photos via Getty Images) “Now we’re married, half (prizemoney) goes to him and half goes to me. 1 Quote
Gammalite Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 48 minutes ago, curious said: “Now we’re married, half (prizemoney) goes to him and half goes to me only newly married this year, so with a large sum like that they could invest in 'real estate' . and set up a nice new home togeather. Hopefully for many years of wed Bliss 🤔 that way if they split up later on (like one in 4 couples do) they can split the home like anyone else 😋 . Meanwhile they can have a nice modern home to live in and it builds in value over time as well. even buy a nice dog for it ? lol. 😆 well Ben could buy a 2nd dog out of his half anyway. A pick each that way 😅 and no fighting lol. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.