Gore race 6.

[mikeynz]

what a fucking shambles, just as well they refunded ya money on the red hot favorite, good way to keeptin the people's good books.

[Brodie]

1 hour ago, mikeynz said:

what a fucking shambles, just as well they refunded ya money on the red hot favorite, good way to keeptin the people's good books.

Why was Hobbs classed as a non runner?

Watched the race and can not see why it is money back?

 

[mikeynz]

23 minutes ago, Brodie said:

Why was Hobbs classed as a non runner?

Watched the race and can not see why it is money back?

 

Might have been coz it's xmas😁

[the galah]

1 hour ago, Brodie said:

Why was Hobbs classed as a non runner?

Watched the race and can not see why it is money back?

 

just the luck of the draw betting on the trots sometimes.

If you slow it down you can see the horse had its weight on the back fee, but only started going backwards after the tape went. It was never going to go awaya with its weight on the back feet,but you see something like that in almost every non win stand ,especially in southland. So an inconsistent decision but thats just the way it goes sometimes.

a recent example,hacksaw ridge at wingatui, was actually going moving backwards for some distance and the starter still let them go,no money back for punters.

I think they contact the tab straight after it happens,if i've have bet on them they deem it a starter,if i have bet on something else that has run a place,they late scratch the horse concerned so as to cut my price.At least it seems like that sometimes. 

Edited 1 hour ago by the galah

[Brodie]

Be very interesting to read the Stipes report!

Definitely should have been classed as a runner, the Stipes I believe have made another error!