Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

Let's focus on something important this week!


Mikie

Recommended Posts

Over the vlast month we have had a thread with multiple replies about 'Aveross Spitfire' Entertaining at times but not a matter that strikes at the very core of racing's future I would suggest

W=e hear on nearly every thread that Brodie is a "Restricted Punter'. Obviously of great interest to him but (although he may disagree) it is a matter that again is not critical to our sport's future

We have JJ Flash telling us repeatedly that Dean/RITA are wonderful and are fixing the mess they inherited. He shies away when it is pointed out that RITA had 18 months to do something and they did nothing. He virtually crawls up his own backside and hides when it is pointed out that RITA were technically insolvent despite Dean's protestations to the contrary. These matters may well be a critical factor in our survival (by our, I mean Harness Racing)

Let's consider what is really important that has happened over the last couple of weeks (I apologise for using round figures, I have been out of action for a week so I have not had time to obtain figures to the last cent, but I am sure that I am pretty accurate)

#1 HRNZ have appointed Phil Holden full-time as the CEO. No advertising of the position, no consultation, nothing. Just at a Board meeting it was "hey Phil's wonderful and he's offered to do 2 full days a week in Christchurch instead of 1.5 On that basis let's make him a permanent fixture. all in favour? Aye Aye. Job done. So now we have a full-time CEO with permission to only be in Christchurch on 2 days a week, another 2 days a week in his home office in Wairarapa, plus 1 day of golf. Isn't that farken brilliant

#2 HRNZ are now having a Conference of Clubs but won't that be a spectacle. Due to their Constitution any Remit can be voted down by just 3 Clubs. Yes, that's right the ATC, NZMTC & Cambridge can vote down any proposal they want simply because their voting numbers are generated by their raceday numbers

#3 HRNZ have decided on their 20/21 funding policy. Stale news you say since the Funding levels are the same as 19/20? Wrong you are. Their fantastic new Policy is as follows (a) every Club gets $9000 per race funding except ATC and NZMTC who get $15000 per race. (B) ATC and NZMTC then get more money for Group Races and the (c) there is a Training Track Subsidy that goes to Clubs that cater for a certain number of horses trained on the Racecourse, unless you are ATC or NZMTC who don't have horses trained on their courses but qualify for the highest level of Training Track Subsidy

Let's take a look at one effect this utterly stupid Policy will have

1. A Club like Westport who is asked to race on Boxing Day with all the additional costs will receive the same funding as a Timaru Meeting in the middle of winter

2. A Club like Westport who generate 2-3 times the Gross Profit to the Industry than the ATC do, is given $9000 per race while ATC is given $15,000

Let's take a closer look at the Training Track Subsidies. Here's where HRNZ have tried to safeguard their support base by buying in favours

ATC get $120k a year for having horses trained there ....they have a Board Representative

Cambridge get $70k a year ....they have a Board Representative

NZMTC get $120k a year....they have a Board Representative

Rangiora get $70k or $120k a year ....they have va Board Representative

Motukarara get $30-40k a year ...they have Ken Spicer

Winton get  similar....they have a Board Representative

Starts to smell? Reeks of self-indulgence

The overall position

One 2 day Club whose figures I have used, not Marlborough, would receive 25% less funding than in 19/20. This means that every race they run for $8000 would drop to $6000. No if's, but's or maybes

Now Tasman Man, some of you aren't that clever

But the long term effect will be that only ATC and NZMTC (ok, perhaps Cambridge for a while) will survive.

For those of you who think that's great, the Industry can cut costs by only racing at 2 Tracks you better remember that the small Tracks are subsidising the big 2 Tracks already, so if they aren't around to do that then the 2 big Tracks will end up in trouble as well. 

Why has it come to this?

Easy enough to answer since the Funding received for this season is equal to or slightly more than the previous season.

The people at Board level are incompetent, and the 2 staff in charge of producing the Funding Model (Bishop & Holden) have absolutely no clue

I don't really care if a Board Member is a success in his own business sphere, all that proves is that he/she should stick to that business because they have no clue as regards harness

This Funding Model, if it proceeds, will mean the end of harness racing anywhere but ATC & NZMTC within 5 years; and then those 2 Clubs will be like the orchestra on the Titanic playing music whilst going under

The 3 architects. Bishop. Holden and Spicer ably supported by Hair, the ATC rep, the NZMTC rep and McNaught (I've left the Cambridge rep out as I'm assured that he is ok, and just caught between a rock and a hard place)

Don't play the man JJ or Tasman Man. Try to refute anything I've posted above

Mikie

 

  • Champ Post 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mikie said:

#1 HRNZ have appointed Phil Holden full-time as the CEO. No advertising of the position, no consultation, nothing. Just at a Board meeting it was "hey Phil's wonderful and he's offered to do 2 full days a week in Christchurch instead of 1.5 On that basis let's make him a permanent fixture. all in favour? Aye Aye. Job done. So now we have a full-time CEO with permission to only be in Christchurch on 2 days a week, another 2 days a week in his home office in Wairarapa, plus 1 day of golf. Isn't that farken brilliant

He is only a caretaker at present isn't he? He didn't seem to want the job when he spoke about it. He is not permanent is he?

He is not the answer to any of harness racing problems. You can tell that by the way he talks hot air.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mikie said:

#2 HRNZ are now having a Conference of Clubs but won't that be a spectacle. Due to their Constitution any Remit can be voted down by just 3 Clubs. Yes, that's right the ATC, NZMTC & Cambridge can vote down any proposal they want simply because their voting numbers are generated by their raceday numbers

That is a joke and bad for the industry. 

There seems to be no coherence or cooperation in harness racing administration at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

He is only a caretaker at present isn't he? He didn't seem to want the job when he spoke about it. He is not permanent is he?

He is not the answer to any of harness racing problems. You can tell that by the way he talks hot air.

 

Sorry Happy, I’m not joking

He was made permanent this week, Tuesday I think

It took a lot of negotiating to get it over the line

Phil had to agree to 2 full days in the HRNZ Office

HRNZ had to agree to a regular work free day for Phil’s golf, to airfares each week, plus taxis meals and accomodation (well I jest in this paragraph, but it would be a great bet that some of it is correct).  Perhaps more likely they beefed up his salary to cover these expenses so no focus could be put on them later

Mikie

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

What do you make of this, Mikie? Supports what you are saying. It is from Stu Bailey's twitter account.

Is it true?

image.png.bb59dec12aa03a7ada3696ec9d291de4.png

 

I don’t have or follow a twitter but this post very accurate. 

As Stu put it, it will be a battle like no other

Mikie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

That is a joke and bad for the industry. 

There seems to be no coherence or cooperation in harness racing administration at all.

Plus no thought, no ideas, (well no rational ones anyway), no leadership and now a CEO who is part time and has no relevant background and no clue

I ask you this....why shouldn’t HRNZ pay Mark P.’, Robert D.’ and/or Mickey Mouse a training track subsidy?  Under HRNZ criteria they would qualify 

Mikie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mikie said:

A Club like Westport who is asked to race on Boxing Day with all the additional costs will receive the same funding as a Timaru Meeting in the middle of winter

Dead right. It's a little thought of fact, with the extra costs of conducting business on a stat day. 

Great post Mikie, some very valid and important points made. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rusty said:

Dead right. It's a little thought of fact, with the extra costs of conducting business on a stat day. 

Great post Mikie, some very valid and important points made. 

Thanks Rusty

I missed another pearler of a decision in HRNZ Funding Proposal

”We shalt also need to steal more from the poor and give to the rich.

The Cup carnival isn’t enough for myself as CEO to be seen parading myself

Gimme $600,000 to pay the Jewels stakes boys”

OK Phil

Mikie

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mikie said:

Plus no thought, no ideas, (well no rational ones anyway), no leadership and now a CEO who is part time and has no relevant background and no clue

I ask you this....why shouldn’t HRNZ pay Mark P.’, Robert D.’ and/or Mickey Mouse a training track subsidy?  Under HRNZ criteria they would qualify 

Mikie

Davey Butt up for a fortune would have close to 200 horses trained on his place.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said:

I can't believe that. Was it announced?

You are joking aren't you? Serious question.

No Happy, I appreciate you are struggling, but it is apparently correct

I think I was told early Wednesday, so early it might still have been Tuesday, but I was taken away in a shiny white van on Wednesday morning and only got home last night. 

Mikie

Edited by Mikie
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mikie said:

No Happy, I appreciate you are struggling, but it is apparently correct

So he has to be in the office for only 2 days a week while trying to fix what seems to be an industry with a multitude of complex problems?

But he has given up all his other positions to solely concentrate on harness racing hasn't he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...