Happy Sunrise Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 I know it is the way it works but I just don't get how La Rosa keeps its paycheck and contribution to the First 4 when it ends another horses chance in the race. Quote
Brodie Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 14 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said: I know it is the way it works but I just don't get how La Rosa keeps its paycheck and contribution to the First 4 when it ends another horses chance in the race. Geez Happy you beat me to it, once again! It is just another stupid rule that are in harness Racing that needs amending However it involves a bit of work having these enquiries, it was far easier to collect revenue by fining drivers Who tap a horse 11 times! Great that they finally saw how dumb it was and now changed it, congratulations! Yes Happy, it it is ludicrous but I think that they wont because it takes time for an enquirey and with one, they lose revenue or tgink they do! Suggestion for HRNZ encourage the NZ TAB to allow their punters to be able to punt!!!! 1 Quote
Noodlum Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 (edited) Inconsistency AGAIN! 3 days for ending a horses chances in a way that could have had worse outcomes in terms of harm. How many days did CJ get again? Edited September 17, 2020 by Noodlum Quote
Happy Sunrise Posted September 17, 2020 Author Posted September 17, 2020 1 hour ago, Noodlum said: Inconsistency AGAIN! 3 days for ending a horses chances in a way that could have had worse outcomes in terms of harm. How many days did CJ get again? They were 2 different rules. Quote
Noodlum Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, Happy Sunrise said: They were 2 different rules. Neither applied consistently. But that aside which behaviour had the potential to have the most negative outcome? Did CJ extinguish anyones chances? Quote
Happy Sunrise Posted September 17, 2020 Author Posted September 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Noodlum said: Neither applied consistently. But that aside which behaviour had the potential to have the most negative outcome? Did CJ extinguish anyones chances? I get where you are coming from. Letting a stable mate into the trail has a negative outcome as well. Should Sam O have got longer? Quote
Davis Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 I agree. I was also surprised that Down to the Bone was not relegated for galloping in the home straight. The horse went into a gallop around 100m from the post and it is questionable if it was pacing again by the time it hit the winners post. I think the connections of the fifth placed horse Laver wold be pissed off. Down to the Bone has done this before and yet I see nothing was said by the stipes. Surely a warning should have been issued? 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.