Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Jesse Alford


Blossom lady

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, the galah said:

We see things differently.

I have total faith in my judgment. 

But to use the UDR and win numbers. 2016 131 wins  udr .5063

                                                                2017  110                 .4493

                                                                2018  122                 .4762

                                                                 2019 115                  .4828

                                                                 2020  81                   .4540                                                                                              

                                                                2021  53                    .4067

                                       Hayden cullen  2021   12                   .4004

 2020 win numbers were lower because of covid.

So there has been a reduction in the udr and win numbers. It will interesting to see the end of season figures.

You haven't made any adjustments to your assessment based on season differences and other factors such as horse/race Class. 

You also have done any comparative analysis between the rest of the population.

The Allstars were still dominating.

However I guess you don't do any statistical analysis and rely on your eyesight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, the galah said:

Actually i do rely on my eyesight.  

If you can't tell the difference thats your problem.  Like newmarkwet has said. Lets just see what plays out in the future,on the racetrack and off. But i doubt you will ever acknowledge anything anyway. 

I believe CUllen is doing a very good job,will be sucessful,but doesn't have the run forever ingredient at the moment. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, hunterthepunter said:

inside 

Did anyone else, read a comment (you know how people were able to post anonymous comments under articles), it said something along the lines of “a small few are ruining it for others, but things will be changing soon or exposed soon”.  something along those lines. It was a Harness related article, but INCA had not yet been announced to public. There were quite a number of comments too. But this particular comment stood out to me. 

Then approx 1-3 weeks after I read this comment, saw breaking news INCA thing announced.

Tried searching for article to re-read the comment last nite, but as don’t remember name of article or what article was about other than Harness or which mainstream media it was, exact date etc, couldn’t find it.

I remember telling someone about comment when INCA was announced,

Their response was, “well they obviously had inside word”.

Edited by Karrots
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Karrots said:

Did anyone else, read a comment (you know how people were able to post anonymous comments under articles), it said something along the lines of “a small few are ruining it for others, but things will be changing soon or exposed soon”.  something along those lines. It was a Harness related article, but INCA had not yet been announced to public. There were quite a number of comments too. But this particular comment stood out to me. 

Then approx 1-3 weeks after I read this comment, saw breaking news INCA thing announced.

Tried searching for article to re-read the comment last nite, but as don’t remember name of article or what article was about other than Harness or which mainstream media it was, exact date etc, couldn’t find it.

I remember telling someone about comment when INCA was announced,

Their response was, “well they obviously had inside word”.

rangatira will no the answer to your comments karrots never heard of that comment

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, hunterthepunter said:

rangatira will no the answer to your comments karrots never heard of that comment

Ok yeah, had only just started following harness that year & didn’t really pay a heap of attention to it. 

Just thought ok that is interesting. Wonder what they are talking about.

Remember it was mid way down ish thru the comments section. There were a number of comments too, but that is all I can re-call. It was either Stuff or Herald, Newshub etc 1 of those media that accepted comments. And it is the only comment I can remember from all the comments. Reading your inside job - comment triggered the memory.

Unfortuntely can not post the link to the article with the comment to show. As can’t find it.

Someone may have read it too. Be interesting to find it tho.

Edited by Karrots
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2021 at 5:08 PM, Karrots said:

When I read Stuff news now main page, I scroll all the way to the bottom, to the other regions & look to see if there is “Harness” word in any of The Press titles. Thats how I found this latest 1. Why am I doing that? Perhaps, because now I am conditioned to expect something negative weekly, even if its just a re-hash or similar. (AND that is the point/issue raised here).

Just did this again and lookie lookie what do I see?

On 3/20/2021 at 10:20 AM, Karrots said:

Can you correctly pick the next timeframe when next negative article from either Press/Star on Harness will be out?

Here are your odds?

0-4 days  $5

5-9 “      $2.5

10-14 “    $3.5

15-19 “   “ $4

20-24 “   “ $7

25-29 “    “ $20

30+        “ $50

Karrots selection is going for the shorts 5-9 days @ $2.5

The correct answer is 3 days so winner was 0-4 days. So Karrots misses with 5-9 day guess. That makes it 6 articles by Press now & 8 total combined with Star, treking towards that 10. 

Edited by Karrots
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Rangatira said:

 

Schultz.jpg

Ok bugger. Tried to rack brain again as to what article it may have been under & thought maybe Messara Report news in Aug 2018. Remember reading that & that would explain lots of comments. But comments have been closed & looks like they have removed all comments too. 

Googled why & said something like they try to encourage social media comments now & too many negative comments in general under media articles so fazed out.

This latest article is on that horse scratched you guys talking about on another thread, Jesse name in so counts. It's just about like they are F...king with us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...