Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lets compare Jamie Kah with the Wanaka couple. All flouted similar laws. Kah potentially could lose millions  long term courtesy Victorian Racing Tribunal.  Short term she had some great mounts lined up e.g. Incentivise.

So what is the Law Society doing to penalise Hannah Rawnsley. AS far as I can see nothing. Rawnsley's offending is far worse as she used a document for an improper purpose and the degree of premeditation far greater.  The minimum they can do is suspend her legal license for say 6 months.

Posted
On 14/09/2021 at 7:41 PM, Gospel of Judas said:

Poor old Equestrian not going be happy. Funny thing is, mother who is the Judge, well known nasty type. Likes sueing fellow judges, who are nextdoor neighbors. So yea old legal field had a bad day!  https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/300406721/wnaka-lockdown-breach-couple-named-apologise-for-irresponsible-and-inexcusable-actions

You've been listening to the Mayoral Candidate too much.

Like him we've become a country of gossips, stitches, busy bodies and sheep.  Started with INCA.

Can't you see what is happening?  We are turning on the supposedly elite while we ignore the misdemeanours of an amorphous group of nobodies who attend a tangi.

Will Siouxie Wiles and Dr Nicola Gaston be prosecuted?  Of course not because they are part of ruling elite that have devised and implemented this craziness! 

Be safe, wear a mask and be kind fellow plebs.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chief Stipe said:

Be safe, wear a mask and be kind fellow plebs.

This is a comment that is below you , because others choose to follow a different path doesn't mean they should be ridiculed . For a man of your intelligence to choose to belittle simply because of a differing opinion is sad . 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, nomates said:

This is a comment that is below you , because others choose to follow a different path doesn't mean they should be ridiculed . For a man of your intelligence to choose to belittle simply because of a differing opinion is sad . 

Is it belittling?  After all I'm just repeating what our Prime Minister Cindy is doing every day from the Pulpit of Truth.  Surely that can't be belittling?

Since when have we been "kind" to our children during this pandemic.  Sweden didn't close it schools or enforce mask wearing and only closed higher education for 3 months.

This is what the "highly contagious and danger Delta variant is doing to Sweden" - 

image.png

Posted

And true to form you are doing what i expected , to try and school me , i don't need your lesson , i respect that you don't agree with what is being done , i respect that you have a differing opinion , but unfortunately you can't just respect that others have a differing mindset , no they are sheep and plebs .

And yes , it is belittling .

But carry on , you always do .

  • Like 3
Posted
23 minutes ago, nomates said:

but unfortunately you can't just respect that others have a differing mindset , no they are sheep and plebs .

FFS I'm only mimicking what Princess Cindy and her Government are doing and taking the piss out of it.  Do you find that acceptable?  I sure hell don't!

Plebs is a generic term referring to the commoners.  I'm a pleb.  The term is Roman and refers to the free citizens who aren't part of the ruling class.

Some famous plebs were - Mark Antony, Brutus, Cleopatra, Cicero.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Chief Stipe said:

You've been listening to the Mayoral Candidate too much.

Like him we've become a country of gossips, stitches, busy bodies and sheep.  Started with INCA.

Can't you see what is happening?  We are turning on the supposedly elite while we ignore the misdemeanours of an amorphous group of nobodies who attend a tangi.

Will Siouxie Wiles and Dr Nicola Gaston be prosecuted?  Of course not because they are part of ruling elite that have devised and implemented this craziness! 

Be safe, wear a mask and be kind fellow plebs.

That is pretty funny You're former good mate LJM. would been reserching  all of that. Found some interesting stuff like this. Which some can be considered questionable.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/judge-must-pay-500-to-woman-hurt-by-dog/DQAOB2DSSIG2UY7JHRWESKRUJM/ 

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/123375/police-may-appeal-ruling-in-sfo-lawyer-case 

Abit of special lawyer treatment https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/complaint-over-lawyers-treatment/2IDEZRW4Z5DVHRCEI2255I3VDE/ 

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/squabbling-judges-stir-polo-alley/NPX3WLQBZTBN6V3V3AGZLYUOPM/ 

Even today, someone not liking media asking questions, got QC onto it.  https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/126400438/judge-sends-legal-warning-after-reporters-ask-questions-about-wnaka-lockdown-breach  

Well so, think he has got some good basis, to ask some really good questions in that. However, in Leo's case more for own we Mayoral campaign and ego. 

 

 

Edited by Gospel of Judas
Posted
13 hours ago, The Centaur said:

Lets compare Jamie Kah with the Wanaka couple. All flouted similar laws. Kah potentially could lose millions  long term courtesy Victorian Racing Tribunal.  Short term she had some great mounts lined up e.g. Incentivise.

So what is the Law Society doing to penalise Hannah Rawnsley. AS far as I can see nothing. Rawnsley's offending is far worse as she used a document for an improper purpose and the degree of premeditation far greater.  The minimum they can do is suspend her legal license for say 6 months.

Law standards committee complaint, has already been filed. So up to NZ Law Society  to do own course of action.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Gospel of Judas said:

Law standards committee complaint, has already been filed. So up to NZ Law Society  to do own course of action.

Why does it matter?  Step back and look at all the other BS that is going on.  

Look at those creating the dumb arse rules.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Why does it matter?  Step back and look at all the other BS that is going on.  

Look at those creating the dumb arse rules.

What is issue got with Lawyers having their own ablity to remove someone clearly not up to task being a practicing lawyer?

Posted
6 minutes ago, Gospel of Judas said:

What is issue got with Lawyers having their own ablity to remove someone clearly not up to task being a practicing lawyer?

Why are they not up to the task of being a lawyer?  

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Why are they not up to the task of being a lawyer?  

Since they are a lawyer, expect better. Considering they knew what were doing was wrong and against a public health order. Would of course, be bad look for lawyer trying to uphold the law.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Gospel of Judas said:

Since they are a lawyer, expect better. Considering they knew what were doing was wrong and against a public health order. Would of course, be bad look for lawyer trying to uphold the law.

FFS I'd measure the lawyer on how well they argue their way out of it.  Just like a shyte load of lawyers who have been caught DIU.

One of her defences will be - has Sousxie Wiles been charged?

Shit I know a few lawyers that should have been done for driving under the influence.

Posted
7 hours ago, nomates said:

This is a comment that is below you , because others choose to follow a different path doesn't mean they should be ridiculed . For a man of your intelligence to choose to belittle simply because of a differing opinion is sad . 

No its sad that a paddock full of sheep are being mauled by a fearsome Chihuahua.

Posted
23 hours ago, Gospel of Judas said:

Law standards committee complaint, has already been filed. So up to NZ Law Society  to do own course of action.

Which is when?

I've seen some disturbing instances lawyers getting back in with just a tap on the bum.

I've got a longstanding grievances against a bunch of lawyers who robbed me of hundreds of thousands dollars. I've been meaning to put a web site to explain it all. Then again given the lengths they went to muzzle me the site would have to be bomb proof.

 

Posted
8 hours ago, The Centaur said:

Which is when?

I've seen some disturbing instances lawyers getting back in with just a tap on the bum.

I've got a longstanding grievances against a bunch of lawyers who robbed me of hundreds of thousands dollars. I've been meaning to put a web site to explain it all. Then again given the lengths they went to muzzle me the site would have to be bomb proof.

 

The process all out in open on this link. Depends on area they practiced from, for who takes it up. https://www.lawsociety.org.nz/for-the-public/complaining-about-a-lawyer/lawyers-standards-committees/ 

The link above, also has about other ways to make a complaint and other bodies you can go to.  But if don't agree with it steps in this linkhttps://www.lawsociety.org.nz/for-the-public/complaining-about-a-lawyer/other-bodies-involved-in-resolution-of-complaints-against-lawyers/ 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 16/09/2021 at 2:35 PM, Chief Stipe said:

Why are they not up to the task of being a lawyer?  

 I would - and I think most would - expect a higher standard of ethical behaviour from lawyers, not less.

  • Like 1
Posted

They are human, just like plumbers and airline pilots and everything inbetween, simply reacting to an insane out of control Government that is wreaking the Culture, Economy, and National interests of NewZealanders, and thats before we start on our international reputation as bludgers. If I was locked up by this bunch of radicals such as this Lawyer and her horsey husband were, then I have every sympathy for them. Good on them for trying to escape the madness. This madness is in the same league as that thats happened in Victoria to those unfortunate jockey's Kah, Melham, Zara and co. NewZealand and Australia will be judged very unkindly in the future by the collective madness displayed by their populations. Both countries are the laughing stock of the world with their failing attempts at eradication, and it highlights their stupidity.

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...