Jump to content
NOTICE TO BOAY'ers: Major Update Coming ×
Bit Of A Yarn

Ruakaka


nomates

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Huey said:

Agree , but have to give them credit at least they now have a winning post and the traffic cone has gone back on traffic safety duty.

See the amenities fund is still alive and thriving,,maybe another club might get funding for a new door knob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, nomates said:

Is there a worse track in NZ for a leader bias , it makes for bloody boring viewing and punting . And they are going to chuck 5 60k races at it in a few weeks , more wasted industry money .

I'm curious what makes you think it has a leader bias? If it does, so what? That should be evident to owners, trainers and punters? Why would it be a problem if it's just the nature of that track?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, curious said:

I'm curious what makes you think it has a leader bias? If it does, so what? That should be evident to owners, trainers and punters? Why would it be a problem if it's just the nature of that track?

For an intelligent guy that is series of stupid questions .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I don't see it that way. I actually do quite well betting at Ruakaka I think partly because of that belief meaning horses expected to lead being overbet. I backed 3 winners there yesterday, a good day and only one of the 3 led. I tend to think that so called leader biases are more likely because of the way races are run than anything to do with the track.

As to my other points, if you believe that the track has a leader bias, why would you take a horse there that can't lead? That doesn't make sense. It would be the same as taking a horse that doesn't like heavy tracks to race in a bog at Trentham for example or if a punter bet on one. It's the nature of the game to try and race and back horses on suitable tracks isn't it?

Edited by curious
  • Like 1
  • Champ Post 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no punter...but perception is everything. 

West Coast tracks are commonly believed to be 'front runners tracks' and everyone goes hell for leather as a result. 

Horses can and do come from behind and win for that reason.

No walk-and-sprint over there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Freda said:

I'm no punter...but perception is everything. 

West Coast tracks are commonly believed to be 'front runners tracks' and everyone goes hell for leather as a result. 

Horses can and do come from behind and win for that reason.

No walk-and-sprint over there.

Exactly. From my data, what tends to happens once that perception establishes is that trainers tend to line up more front running type horses at those venues making it more likely that the best horse in any race is a front-runner. Therefore, it becomes a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy. The good thing from a punting perspective is that means that on occasion when the best horse is not a front runner, it is much more likely to be at value while still just as likely to win.

Edited by curious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 races  5 leaders won

Deploy, Mistress Minx, Smart Rocks, Golden Hue & Tightlign.

Kerikeri led then trailed and got up to beat the horse that did lead.

Masetto went up at the 1000m to sit second outside the leader and wore him down to win narrowly.

Cakebytheocean sat second on the outer and came away to win.

So 8 of the 10 races were won by the leader or the horse in second position.

That left On Fifth Avenue who settled a handy fifth and Diamond Girl who settled back but came around quickly turning in as the only two winners who were not in the first two in the running. 

It is a continuing trend at Ruakaka.    

    

  • Like 2
  • Champ Post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, All The Aces said:

10 races  5 leaders won

Deploy, Mistress Minx, Smart Rocks, Golden Hue & Tightlign.

Kerikeri led then trailed and got up to beat the horse that did lead.

Masetto went up at the 1000m to sit second outside the leader and wore him down to win narrowly.

Cakebytheocean sat second on the outer and came away to win.

So 8 of the 10 races were won by the leader or the horse in second position.

That left On Fifth Avenue who settled a handy fifth and Diamond Girl who settled back but came around quickly turning in as the only two winners who were not in the first two in the running. 

It is a continuing trend at Ruakaka.    

    

Your point?  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Your point?  

I think it creates boring racing , well at least not as bad as AWT. But surely no one with a $ on a horse likes to punt and see their horse get back midfield or worse and know they have no chance 200m into a race and then for me it creates a why bother scenario.

Of course that's not going to be the impression expert punters like Curious have, who is far better than most at ascertaining how a race is going to pan out.  Be interested to know how the experts go about doing that at Ruakaka?

Don't want to seem like I'm moaning as we all know Ruakaka has come along way, I just get a bit emotional at Ruakaka now the traffic cone has gone.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Huey said:

think it creates boring racing , well at least not as bad as AWT. But surely no one with a $ on a horse likes to punt and see their horse get back midfield or worse and know they have no chance 200m into a race and then for me it creates a why bother scenario.

In my opinion this issue is due to our Jockey's not being able to assess pace and not putting their horses into a race or a position to win.

It isn't easy on any track to sit back on a Soft or Heavy track and expect to storm down the outside in the last 300m.   Yet our riders think they can.

I agree with Curious. 

If there is a track related leaders bias at Ruakaka what aspects of the track causes it?

I don't see any.  Therefore as Curious suggests it is perception by Trainers and Jockey's that becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

In my opinion this issue is due to our Jockey's not being able to assess pace and not putting their horses into a race or a position to 

I don't see any.  Therefore as Curious suggests it is perception by Trainers and Jockey's that becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.

So how does the prophecy go unfulfilled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chief Stipe said:

Perhaps more Jockeys should consider going forward earlier to put themselves in the race.  

Ryan Elliot's ride on Masetto the other day a good example. No pace on. Went forward at the 1000 3 wide. Flat from the 700. Best horse wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Freda said:

I'm no punter...but perception is everything. 

West Coast tracks are commonly believed to be 'front runners tracks' and everyone goes hell for leather as a result. 

Horses can and do come from behind and win for that reason.

No walk-and-sprint over there.

Only had 4 runners on the coast in my life for a win and 3 placings. Most recent raced on the pace. The other 3 settled last and ran home. That's on 3 different tracks including the cack hander.

Edited by curious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...