-
Available Subscriptions
Soccer
4 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 3.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 40 replies
- 6.2k views
-
- 2 replies
- 2.1k views
Announcements
-
Posts
-
Harmless, compared to what a few got away with in recent times. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
I note you didn't watch the race or follow the process closely. Where does it state in the rules that separate incidents consitute separate inquiries? Regardless in this case both the second and third horse were protesting against the first horse for the same incident. Before you get even more pedantic a single incident doesn't have to be a single point in time. From the Stipes Report which is readily available online: Following the running of this race connections of the second placed horse AUTUMN GLORY and the third placed horse GENEVA lodged protests alleging interference over the concluding stages against the first placed horse ROAD TO PARIS. After viewing films and considering submissions the Adjudicative Committee dismissed both protests with placings standing 1st ROAD TO PARIS, 2nd AUTUMN GLORY, 3rd GENEVA, 4th WIGMORE. -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Yes, even nuns.... -
By Chief Stipe · Posted
Of course perspective will go completely out the window here. The facts: Lawyer running a sole practice - that is one lawyer. Employs a number of legal staff and front office - all female. No HR department or HR processes and procedures in place. Lawyer starts watching porn periodically on his computer 2016. Staff entering room sometimes cafch snippets of porn as he switches between browser tabs. 2022 firm moves to new offices. Lawyers screen is more visible due to new room layout. November 2022 - first complaint is lodged by junior staff member to senior staff member. Lawyer confronted with complaint. He promises to address the issue. No more complaints until 2 months later. Post those complaints in April 2023 Lawyer starts working from home. Employee relationship broken and they leave April 2023. They then lodge a complaint with the NZ Law Society. Hearing held in November 2025. Lawyer has name suppression. Lawyer suspended by Law Society for 3 months (suspension ends March 6 2026). Ordered to pay ex-staff $5,000 each and $20k in Law Society costs. Initially indicated he would appeal and later decided not to. Name suppression lifted on Monday 8 March 2026. Article published in mainstream media - racing particpant (anti?) tips off journalist. Journalist now has 5 headline articles since case was first notified. -
-
-
Topics
-
