Jump to content
Bit Of A Yarn

Galloping Chat

Thoroughbred Racing forum discussion.


4,450 topics in this forum

  1. 2 Good Blokes

    • 2 replies
    • 196 views
    • 4 replies
    • 100 views
    • 0 replies
    • 85 views
    • 4 replies
    • 354 views
    • 0 replies
    • 38 views
    • 6 replies
    • 149 views
    • 33 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 13 replies
    • 511 views
    • 1 reply
    • 151 views
  2. Vale Martin Dennis

    • 9 replies
    • 470 views
    • 7 replies
    • 314 views
    • 13 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 9 replies
    • 467 views
  3. I'll Bet you $10

    • 1 reply
    • 354 views
    • 1 reply
    • 186 views
  4. Spirited away?

    • 7 replies
    • 613 views
  5. GORE GONE :( 1 2

    • 35 replies
    • 1.5k views
    • 4 replies
    • 595 views
    • 83 replies
    • 2.7k views
  6. NZB Kiwi 2026 1 2

    • 49 replies
    • 1.8k views
    • 12 replies
    • 858 views
    • 7 replies
    • 517 views
  7. Positives

    • 12 replies
    • 852 views
    • 3 replies
    • 375 views
    • 58 replies
    • 1.7k views

Announcements



  • Posts

    • So,in the last fortnight hrnz have programmed and run 2 2year old races at addington. So they cut the stake of the race 2 weeks ago due to such a small field. . well,tonights race,had even less,only 3 starters and they left the stake the same.. essentially,the winner of the 3 horse race earned $2750 more than the winner of the 4 horse race. why,because thats the way hrnz progrmmed it to be.they said the stake is based on the number of acceptors,not the number of starters. and you see,that of course means any trainer could essentially accept with a horse that they have no intention of starting, to make sure HRNZ pay out the higher stake.you can't blame any trainer for simply being too clever for hrnz.Mind you that doesn't seem too hard the way they programmed it. So what was going on with the stipes not giving the dalgety trained Roger That any stand down. surely,for the sake of tranparency the stipes should have told people what the exceptional circumstances were which meant he got off with no penalty . Don't they know that Dalgety,after roger that won 2 weeks ago,had reported on his website that roger that was not going to run tonight and was going out for a short break. So whats going on there.Can't the stipes work out that people may ask questions why they decided roger that wasn't to get a scratching penalty?We can giess why,but maybe thats why they are saying. Hrnz really don't seem too clever sometimes.
    • By chance when we did  a trip to the deep south for a Riverton and then a meeting at Ascot Park last year,  in a 6 way chat, all Life Member types!!!    His name came up! heads dropped,  what happen, or perhaps the way it all played out was not the Southern way..
    • won a nice mile race at Trentham, D Browne on? then backed up for a place in the G1?   a nice grey did he get to 20 wins! I have some nice shots of him winning at Riccarton!
    • Not sure what the final balance was tonight as they are very quiet when they get a hiding! started with over $18k but with no greyhound racing they were always going to struggle on past experience! They were all over the place with their betting with Brendan Popplewell putting nearly $5k on the nose of a galloper in Hong Kong ffs? They encourage this bet responsibly but that obviously doesnt mean the presenters on out the gate have to abide by this? With respect they clearly have not been chosen by the TAB to bet responsibly and pick winners! When you can not make money on NZ racing and they choose to wager overseas rather than supporting our local product, it is telling you something! Seems odd that people continue to put money into the OTG betting pool rather than wanting to pick themselves? Anyway, each to their own and good luck to them, but seriously it is not painting a great picture with this carefree, it isnt my money, so blow it attitude!        
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...