How do you know they didn't act?
How did nominating the dog cause it harm?
It was scratched but then proceeded to do a trial which it passed.
I guess GRNZ has the same issues that NZTR and HRNZ have with their antiquated IT systems. They require a degree of manual oversight that sometimes leads to error.
However Opawa Pip trialed two weeks previoiusly on 30 July. Was that not a Safe Return to Racing trial?