You don't appear to have comprehended either article. Both are pointing the finger at the process and the officials.
But you keep plugging your conspiracy theories.
So please explain why the clubs who get most of the resources and supposedly have professional full time management have the worst track surfaces?
Namely - Ellerslie, Te Rapa, Awapuni, New Plymouth, Riccarton?!
In your initial post on this subject you inferred the opposite I.e. Mr Ellis was doing his mates at Cambridge Stud a favour!
You can't have it both ways. Well maybe YOU can.
The Jockey apparently was of the opinion that the filly would have won regardless of any interference.
HOWEVER the Stipes AND the JCA are quite within their rights to ask the jockey to give evidence.
Mr Ellis didn't prevent the jockey from giving evidence they just decided not to protest. Which is well within their rights.
As for De Lore he got the process factually wrong in his article.
Will this proposed piece of legislation allow the government to procure the New Plymouth grounds from local government?
I recall not too long ago there was talk of not renewing the racing clubs lease.
Rule Number(s): 534(1)Following the earlier Decision to decline the request to late-scratch FEARLESS from Race 9, the Training Partnership of D & E Haworth was charged with scratching the horse without permission to do so.
(Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
Rule Number(s): 534(2)(b)Following the running of Race 6 Information No. A12303 was filed with the Judicial Committee. The Information stated that Ms E Haworth wished to scratch FEARLESS from Race 9, with the Stipendiary Stewards not believing that there were grounds to do so.
(Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
Rule Number(s): 638(3)(b)(ii)Following Race 1, Mr Goodwin lodged an information with the Judicial Committee alleging a breach of Rule 638 (3) (b) (ii) in that J Fawcett used her whip excessively prior to the 100m on her mount TOUCH THE CLOUDS. At the outset of the hearing, Ms Fawcett confirmed that she understood the Rule and that ...
(Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
Rule Number(s): 642(1)Following Race 1 (CR Grace/ Awassi NZ 2200) a protest was lodged pursuant to Rule 642(1) by Mr J Parkes alleging that horse number 9 (BELINDABELLA) or its rider placed 1st by the Judge interfered with the chances of horse number 7 (TAKE THAT), placed 2nd by the Judge. The information alleged interference ...
(Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
Rule Number(s): 638(3)(b)(ii)Following Race 2, Mr Goodwin lodged an information with the Judicial Committee alleging a breach of Rule 638 (3) (b) (ii) in that R Hannam used his whip excessively prior to the 100m on his mount KELLY’S INSPIRATION. At the outset of the hearing, Mr Hannam confirmed that he understood the Rule and that ...
(Feed generated with FetchRSS)View the full article
I'm not sure what this argument is about but I've been to Levin and Foxton workouts and both had coffee and snacks available. You had to pay but that's ok.