Doomed

I was being a bit sarcastic. I was describing the pick 6, which I presume has been scrapped. I don't recall seeing it mentioned for a while.

Surely the big question now is do you keep spending massive money (which I don't imagine the industry possesses) on a totally suspect track that the industry doesn't even own or cut the losses and close it down. There is a multi million AWT track being built down the road so surely the industry can't afford to spend millions on repairing a provincial track. When you look at the unwanted tracks like Timaru, Oamaru, Hawera and Foxton and compare them to some of the favoured tracks and their performance and history you do wonder what sort of leadership we have. And to repeat what I have said before, that Messara report doesn't have a great record so far with the tracks it favoured.

What about an off course bet type where you have to select the last six winners at a given meeting and it jackpots if not struck?

Bloody hell! I certainly didn't expect to see this when I checked on here. Words fail me really. This is one of the golden child favoured tracks. They get more special subsidies for weird races than any other club. The local council wants the land, why not just give it to them for a golden handshake. Get enough money to tidy up Hawera and start again. All the money spent on massive salaries for failed ex cops. Surely what is needed is some money spent on turf experts. I see the listed race is having a third go at getting off the ground. Different direction and different distance this time.

I don't think you could win a million or more in those.

That was 50 years ago. There was no such thing as lotto then, and no big off course pools, and no way to watch races unless you were on course. It wouldn't work these days.

Thank god for the top weight. The owners of Concert Hall could just about ask for an appearance fee to make an appearance at any meeting with a suspect group race.

Probably fair.

There would be no interest these days. On course crowds are far too small to get anything like that moving. It would probably only grow by $2,000 to $4,000 per meeting in the early days. On course turnover is about 5 times smaller at most meetings than it used to be. Taking inflation into account it should obviously be much bigger than it used to be. You have to remember in the days of the on course jackpots there were no big off course pools. No trifectas, first fours etc.

They did start with big fields, still about 10 left in most races. Trainers just don't like racing in big fields and because they have so many opportunities they can just pick and choose.

I bet most clubs in NZ would love to have a track like Corbould Park.

Interesting one. Went from looking the possible winner at the 200m, to running 5th. Tough life for jockeys: don't hit them hard and often enough and get into trouble for not riding them out, hit them too hard and often and get into trouble for that as well. Consistency is all we ask for.

I think you will find Joh came from Dannevirke.

Interesting day on the punt for harness punters. Winners paying $1.10. $1.10, $1.20, $1.40 and $101. Not much there for us normal punters.

To be fair, the racing articles on the website are actually some of the best things they do. They are generally well written and usually relevant and interesting.

Was it intentionally designed to be only 6 races, trying to copy the Karaka thing? Seems high risk when many of the races aren't betting options.

Certainly an eclectic bunch of slot holders. Good luck to them all. It will be interesting to see how it works out. I presume no crowds will be allowed and I think it is outside the Government's time slot to reimburse organisers of failed events.

Someone liked that comment, but I couldn't understand a word of it.

I thought it already was.

While we are being critical of Auckland we should also note that Addington Friday is not a lot better. 5 and 6 horse fields for $20,000 and only 8 in the $17,500 race for horses coming through the grades. I can never understand where the horses disappear to in the trots. They run so many maidens and 1 to 2 win races (I don't understand their strange rating system where winners can be rated lower than maidens and run for lower stakes) and then the winners seem to disappear and they never have enough horses for 4,5,6 win type races.

The one that always gets me, that shows how stupid they are and how little they really care, is the way they always convert Aussie stakes to NZ dollars, so a $100,000 race always becomes $109,000. Interestingly though they always convert NZ stakes as well. So, for instance, Callsign Mav this weekend didn't race in a couple of $220,000 races at HB, he raced in a couple of $224,000 races. I'm not sure what currency he was racing for at HB? Chatham Islands dollars, monopoly money. Once again, a total inability to get the basics right. And how much did that computer cost?

Every week those form guide comments are a laughing stock. Quite often the horse described as "rank outsider' will go out well favoured and almost win the race. It is basically all programmed based on the group rating of the race. When you see a horse coming out of a group 3 and about to race in a $2m sales series race it will usually mention "drops in class". Its an embarrassment really.

I see in the TAB form guide for the Apollo Stakes this weekend she is described as a "Handy galloper. Class drop helps."

Is that intentional on Saturday night? Six shitty little fields for big stakes. Could they not get enough horses for ten races? Fancy running a race for 3 starters on a six race card.

Hard to know how good she might be, didn't beat much.