Huey

Which clubs, you keep making reference to clubs but you never back it up with any names. So which clubs can't maintain their assets? If they went with you they'd have to sit on seats covered in bird poop cause you'd be too busy telling everyone what needs to be done without lifting a finger to make things better, I'm sure they'd love listening to another one of your lectures about what should be done while you do nothing.

I'm not like you and concerned with fly by nighters and how much margin I can make out of them at the races (don't see a lot of it going back into stakes), I want them going because they enjoy the sport and want to come back for that very reason not the piss up. I guess if they go with you to the races they have to drink to enjoy their day out though!

While I was doing the mahi on a committee and you were talking about it!

The only thought that's gone into is get people on the grog , that's been racing easy fix. Ask most of them what they associate with the sport and it isn't betting its the booze.

You prove yourself right, stop saying things and assuming its correct. You provide some backing to the generalisations you spray all over the forum.

Now you're just lying , you have Tangerine blinker on permanently. There is no need to , you never post anything of substance you just disagree with the poster and pretend you know everything. I'm still waiting for you to fulfil your potential and get on a committee you can tell them everything you know and make it alright , @Chief Stipe you're all hat and no cattle!

Stop trying to sidestep the issue in an attempt to defend your idols, I don't care what you call me it is of no relevance to me. Why do you apply a certain criteria to TA but another to others? Youre a fanboy @Chief Stipe nothing more, your inability to be subjective is costing you dearly.

You don't make excuses for those trialling in their wake in NZ ,so why are you always looking for an excuse when they don't meet expectations? Any fan boys have to be realistic at some point. Happy for them.

Pretty shabby for a stable spending the $s they are and with the setup they have in NZ. Funny how you ignore the fact they have more firepower in than anyone in NZ but spruik them as underdogs in Aus. They won't be happy with how Aus has gone for them initially , they should have the firepower to be competitive there.

So they won about as much as one of their yearlings cost?

No you can't have it both ways ,but you certainly can't have it the wrong way ...which is exactly where this is heading.

They are all a protected species to me, like your idol I believe we need every track we can get, that's been proven countless times year after year in this industry. I'm also not confident a bunch of fly by nighters are the right people to be telling the industry which tracks should stay and which should go, not to mention the governing body should never be given the opportunity to spend a $ of the industry money they've proven that over and over again, should any of these ... it will be nothing short of a disaster. Fools involved in the disaster that is Awapuni, millions on an IT system that never got off the ground they make the Green Party look good!

What is up & running @Chief Stipe ?

None of the clubs have done anything to deserve the treatment they have gotten from NZTR. Only the delusional or those who dont understand the ins & outs of club land like @Chief Stipe think they do. More importantly why does the industry let NZTR think it's not needed.

I guess the logic is owners liable to have a bet.